Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera
The article analyzes the reception of the “Secret History” pamphlet written by Procopius of Caesarea, a 7 th century AD Byzantine historian, author of well-known panegyric texts about the Basileus Justinian. The manuscript of this pamphlet was found by an hellenophile Niccolo Alemanni and published...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | Studia Litterarum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://studlit.ru/images/2018-3-4/Golubkov.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850217630157242368 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrey V. Golubkov |
| author_facet | Andrey V. Golubkov |
| author_sort | Andrey V. Golubkov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article analyzes the reception of the “Secret History” pamphlet written by Procopius of Caesarea, a 7 th century AD Byzantine historian, author of well-known panegyric texts about the Basileus Justinian. The manuscript of this pamphlet was found by an hellenophile Niccolo Alemanni and published in 1623 in Lyon as “Anekdota” (this literary work was first mentioned under this Greek title, meaning “unedited notes,” in “Suda,” a 10 th century AD Greek encyclopedic lexicon). 17 th century French historians and writers perceived “Secret History” as a unique attempt to see behind the curtain of byzantine history and to learn the true causes of great events. Antoine de Varillas, a famous historian, tried to create a “secret history” based on the history of the Medici Florence. The article argues that in the 17 th century, the meaning and pragmatics of this work by Procopius were understood in an incorrect way: the text of “Secret History” could have been created as an exercise in rhetoric, in which Procopius was showing his abilities not only as a writer of panegyrics but also as a master of “inverted” praise. To support this hypothesis, the article provides examples related to the descriptions of Justinian as a demon, tracing their origin to the characters from “The Testament of Solomon”, as well as pornographic scenes dealing with the basilissa’s follies that resemble rhetorically hypertrophied exempla from the oratory skills manuals (progymnasmata) by Hermogenes of Tarsus. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3a637a2d9b7d49e493cc22426d3c8683 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2500-4247 2541-8564 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
| publisher | Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Litterarum |
| spelling | doaj-art-3a637a2d9b7d49e493cc22426d3c86832025-08-20T02:08:00ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World LiteratureStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642018-12-013410611510.22455/2500-4247-2018-3-4-106-115Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera Andrey V. Golubkov0A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe article analyzes the reception of the “Secret History” pamphlet written by Procopius of Caesarea, a 7 th century AD Byzantine historian, author of well-known panegyric texts about the Basileus Justinian. The manuscript of this pamphlet was found by an hellenophile Niccolo Alemanni and published in 1623 in Lyon as “Anekdota” (this literary work was first mentioned under this Greek title, meaning “unedited notes,” in “Suda,” a 10 th century AD Greek encyclopedic lexicon). 17 th century French historians and writers perceived “Secret History” as a unique attempt to see behind the curtain of byzantine history and to learn the true causes of great events. Antoine de Varillas, a famous historian, tried to create a “secret history” based on the history of the Medici Florence. The article argues that in the 17 th century, the meaning and pragmatics of this work by Procopius were understood in an incorrect way: the text of “Secret History” could have been created as an exercise in rhetoric, in which Procopius was showing his abilities not only as a writer of panegyrics but also as a master of “inverted” praise. To support this hypothesis, the article provides examples related to the descriptions of Justinian as a demon, tracing their origin to the characters from “The Testament of Solomon”, as well as pornographic scenes dealing with the basilissa’s follies that resemble rhetorically hypertrophied exempla from the oratory skills manuals (progymnasmata) by Hermogenes of Tarsus.http://studlit.ru/images/2018-3-4/Golubkov.pdfByzantine EmpireFranceProcopius of Caesareaanecdotehistory“secret history”rhetoric. |
| spellingShingle | Andrey V. Golubkov Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera Studia Litterarum Byzantine Empire France Procopius of Caesarea anecdote history “secret history” rhetoric. |
| title | Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera |
| title_full | Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera |
| title_fullStr | Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera |
| title_short | Anekdota of Procopius of Caesarea between History and Literature: Basileus vs Demon; Basilissa vs Hetaera |
| title_sort | anekdota of procopius of caesarea between history and literature basileus vs demon basilissa vs hetaera |
| topic | Byzantine Empire France Procopius of Caesarea anecdote history “secret history” rhetoric. |
| url | http://studlit.ru/images/2018-3-4/Golubkov.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreyvgolubkov anekdotaofprocopiusofcaesareabetweenhistoryandliteraturebasileusvsdemonbasilissavshetaera |