Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study

Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence of repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts in a Turkish subpopulation. Material and Methods: A total of 6364 patients’ cone-beam computed tomography data were analysed retrospective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fahrettin Kalabalık, Emre Aytuğar, Fatoş Aykanat, Ceren Çiftçi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology 2024-03-01
Series:eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2024/1/e6/v15n1e6ht.htm
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849253777408786432
author Fahrettin Kalabalık
Emre Aytuğar
Fatoş Aykanat
Ceren Çiftçi
author_facet Fahrettin Kalabalık
Emre Aytuğar
Fatoş Aykanat
Ceren Çiftçi
author_sort Fahrettin Kalabalık
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence of repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts in a Turkish subpopulation. Material and Methods: A total of 6364 patients’ cone-beam computed tomography data were analysed retrospectively to identify repeated scans due to motion artefacts. Patients were divided into eight age groups: 1) < 10-year-olds, 2) 10 to 19-year-olds, 3) 20 to 29-year-olds, 4) 30 to 39-year-olds, 5) 40 to 49-year-olds, 6) 50 to 59-year-olds, 7) 60 to 69-year-olds, and 8) > 70 year-olds. Chi-square test was applied to evaluate the repetition rate of scans by age and gender groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Repeated scans due to motion artefacts were observed in 1.96% of the patients. The repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in males than in females (P = 0.006). Furthermore, the repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in patients < 10 years old compared to the other age groups. However, there was no significant difference in the repetition rate of scans due to motion artefacts among the other age groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The present findings suggest that patient age and gender are associated with repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts. Males and children under the age of 10 had more common repeated scans due to motion artefacts.
format Article
id doaj-art-3a4870bcda754241a7b86b12e3e63138
institution Kabale University
issn 2029-283X
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology
record_format Article
series eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-3a4870bcda754241a7b86b12e3e631382025-08-20T03:56:13ZengLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of OdontologyeJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2024-03-01151e610.5037/jomr.2024.15106Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective StudyFahrettin KalabalıkEmre AytuğarFatoş AykanatCeren ÇiftçiObjectives: The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence of repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts in a Turkish subpopulation. Material and Methods: A total of 6364 patients’ cone-beam computed tomography data were analysed retrospectively to identify repeated scans due to motion artefacts. Patients were divided into eight age groups: 1) < 10-year-olds, 2) 10 to 19-year-olds, 3) 20 to 29-year-olds, 4) 30 to 39-year-olds, 5) 40 to 49-year-olds, 6) 50 to 59-year-olds, 7) 60 to 69-year-olds, and 8) > 70 year-olds. Chi-square test was applied to evaluate the repetition rate of scans by age and gender groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Repeated scans due to motion artefacts were observed in 1.96% of the patients. The repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in males than in females (P = 0.006). Furthermore, the repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in patients < 10 years old compared to the other age groups. However, there was no significant difference in the repetition rate of scans due to motion artefacts among the other age groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The present findings suggest that patient age and gender are associated with repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts. Males and children under the age of 10 had more common repeated scans due to motion artefacts.https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2024/1/e6/v15n1e6ht.htmartifactcone-beam computed tomographymovementpatient
spellingShingle Fahrettin Kalabalık
Emre Aytuğar
Fatoş Aykanat
Ceren Çiftçi
Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
artifact
cone-beam computed tomography
movement
patient
title Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
title_full Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
title_short Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
title_sort repetition rate of scanning due to motion artefacts in cone beam computed tomography a retrospective study
topic artifact
cone-beam computed tomography
movement
patient
url https://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2024/1/e6/v15n1e6ht.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT fahrettinkalabalık repetitionrateofscanningduetomotionartefactsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT emreaytugar repetitionrateofscanningduetomotionartefactsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT fatosaykanat repetitionrateofscanningduetomotionartefactsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT cerenciftci repetitionrateofscanningduetomotionartefactsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy