Effect of terrestrial nutrient limitation on the estimation of the remaining carbon budget

<p>The carbon cycle plays a foundational role in the estimation of the remaining carbon budget. It is intrinsic for the determination of the transient climate response to cumulative <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions and the zero-emis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. L. De Sisto, A. H. MacDougall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024-11-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/21/4853/2024/bg-21-4853-2024.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<p>The carbon cycle plays a foundational role in the estimation of the remaining carbon budget. It is intrinsic for the determination of the transient climate response to cumulative <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> emissions and the zero-emissions commitment. For the terrestrial carbon cycle, nutrient limitation is a core regulation on the amount of carbon fixed by terrestrial vegetation. Hence, the addition of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus in land model structures in Earth system models is essential for an accurate representation of the carbon cycle feedback in future climate projections. Therefore, the estimation of the remaining carbon budget is impacted by the representation of nutrient limitation in modelled terrestrial ecosystems; however, it is rarely accounted for. Here, we estimate the carbon budget and remaining carbon budget of a nutrient-limited Earth system model, using nitrogen and phosphorus cycles to limit vegetation productivity and biomass. We use eight Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (hereafter SSP) scenarios and idealized experiments with three distinct model structures: (1) carbon cycle without nutrient limitation, (2) carbon cycle with terrestrial nitrogen limitation, and (3) carbon cycle with terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. To capture the uncertainty in the remaining carbon budget, three different climate sensitives were tuned for each model version. Our results show that, overall, nutrient limitation reduced the remaining carbon budget for all simulations in comparison with the carbon cycle without nutrient limitation. Between nitrogen and nitrogen–phosphorus limitation, the latter had the lowest remaining carbon budget. The mean remaining carbon budgets obtained from the SSP scenario simulations for the 1.5 <span class="inline-formula">°C</span> target in the non-nutrient-limited, nitrogen-limited, and nitrogen–phosphorus-limited models were 228, 185, and 175 <span class="inline-formula">Pg C</span>, respectively, relative to the year 2020. For the 2 <span class="inline-formula">°C</span> target, the mean remaining carbon budget values were 471, 373, and 351 <span class="inline-formula">Pg C</span> for the non-nutrient-limited, nitrogen-limited, and nitrogen–phosphorus-limited models, respectively, relative to the year 2020. This represents a reduction of 19 % and 24 % for the 1.5 <span class="inline-formula">°C</span> target and 21 % and 26 % for the 2 <span class="inline-formula">°C</span> target for the respective nitrogen- and nitrogen–phosphorus-limited simulations compared with the non-nutrient-limited model. These results show that terrestrial nutrient limitation constitutes an important factor to be considered when estimating or interpreting remaining carbon budgets and that it is an essential uncertainty in the remaining carbon budgets from Earth system model simulations.</p>
ISSN:1726-4170
1726-4189