Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment

Abstract Mismatches between perceived and veridical physiological signals during false feedback (FFB) can bias emotional judgements. Paradigms using auditory FFB suggest perceived changes in heart rate (HR) increase ratings of emotional intensity irrespective of feedback type (increased or decreased...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joel Patchitt, Sarah Garfinkel, William H. Strawson, Mark Miller, Manos Tsakiris, Andy Clark, Hugo D. Critchley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94971-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850217207033757696
author Joel Patchitt
Sarah Garfinkel
William H. Strawson
Mark Miller
Manos Tsakiris
Andy Clark
Hugo D. Critchley
author_facet Joel Patchitt
Sarah Garfinkel
William H. Strawson
Mark Miller
Manos Tsakiris
Andy Clark
Hugo D. Critchley
author_sort Joel Patchitt
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Mismatches between perceived and veridical physiological signals during false feedback (FFB) can bias emotional judgements. Paradigms using auditory FFB suggest perceived changes in heart rate (HR) increase ratings of emotional intensity irrespective of feedback type (increased or decreased HR), implicating right anterior insula as a mismatch comparator between exteroceptive and interoceptive information. However, few paradigms have examined effects of somatosensory FFB. Participants rated the emotional intensity of randomized facial expressions while they received 20 s blocks of pulsatile somatosensory stimulation at rates higher than HR, lower than HR, equivalent to HR, or no stimulation during a functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging scan. FFB exerted a bidirectional effect on reported intensity ratings of the emotional faces, increasing over the course of each 20 s stimulation block. Neuroimaging showed FFB engaging regions indicative of affective touch processing, embodiment, and reflex suppression. Contrasting higher vs. lower HR FFB revealed engagement of right insula and centres supporting socio-emotional processing. Results indicate that exposure to pulsatile somatosensory stimulation can influence emotional judgements though its progressive embodiment as a perceived interoceptive arousal state, biasing how affective salience is ascribed to external stimuli. Results are consistent with multimodal integration of priors and prediction-error signalling in shaping perceptual judgments.
format Article
id doaj-art-3a1da75e8d1a451aa0546a6982550a1a
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-3a1da75e8d1a451aa0546a6982550a1a2025-08-20T02:08:08ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-04-0115111710.1038/s41598-025-94971-6Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodimentJoel Patchitt0Sarah Garfinkel1William H. Strawson2Mark Miller3Manos Tsakiris4Andy Clark5Hugo D. Critchley6Sussex Centre for Consciousness Science, University of SussexInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College LondonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of SussexMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of LondonSchool of Media, Arts and Humanities, University of SussexSussex Centre for Consciousness Science, University of SussexAbstract Mismatches between perceived and veridical physiological signals during false feedback (FFB) can bias emotional judgements. Paradigms using auditory FFB suggest perceived changes in heart rate (HR) increase ratings of emotional intensity irrespective of feedback type (increased or decreased HR), implicating right anterior insula as a mismatch comparator between exteroceptive and interoceptive information. However, few paradigms have examined effects of somatosensory FFB. Participants rated the emotional intensity of randomized facial expressions while they received 20 s blocks of pulsatile somatosensory stimulation at rates higher than HR, lower than HR, equivalent to HR, or no stimulation during a functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging scan. FFB exerted a bidirectional effect on reported intensity ratings of the emotional faces, increasing over the course of each 20 s stimulation block. Neuroimaging showed FFB engaging regions indicative of affective touch processing, embodiment, and reflex suppression. Contrasting higher vs. lower HR FFB revealed engagement of right insula and centres supporting socio-emotional processing. Results indicate that exposure to pulsatile somatosensory stimulation can influence emotional judgements though its progressive embodiment as a perceived interoceptive arousal state, biasing how affective salience is ascribed to external stimuli. Results are consistent with multimodal integration of priors and prediction-error signalling in shaping perceptual judgments.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94971-6InteroceptionFalse physiological feedbackInsulaEmotion recognitionPerceptionPredictive coding
spellingShingle Joel Patchitt
Sarah Garfinkel
William H. Strawson
Mark Miller
Manos Tsakiris
Andy Clark
Hugo D. Critchley
Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment
Scientific Reports
Interoception
False physiological feedback
Insula
Emotion recognition
Perception
Predictive coding
title Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment
title_full Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment
title_fullStr Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment
title_full_unstemmed Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment
title_short Somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment
title_sort somatosensory false feedback biases emotional ratings through interoceptive embodiment
topic Interoception
False physiological feedback
Insula
Emotion recognition
Perception
Predictive coding
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94971-6
work_keys_str_mv AT joelpatchitt somatosensoryfalsefeedbackbiasesemotionalratingsthroughinteroceptiveembodiment
AT sarahgarfinkel somatosensoryfalsefeedbackbiasesemotionalratingsthroughinteroceptiveembodiment
AT williamhstrawson somatosensoryfalsefeedbackbiasesemotionalratingsthroughinteroceptiveembodiment
AT markmiller somatosensoryfalsefeedbackbiasesemotionalratingsthroughinteroceptiveembodiment
AT manostsakiris somatosensoryfalsefeedbackbiasesemotionalratingsthroughinteroceptiveembodiment
AT andyclark somatosensoryfalsefeedbackbiasesemotionalratingsthroughinteroceptiveembodiment
AT hugodcritchley somatosensoryfalsefeedbackbiasesemotionalratingsthroughinteroceptiveembodiment