Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism

In the context of the ongoing global intertwined financial, environmental, socio-political crises, the intricate relationship between neoliberal urban planning and the challenges these crises present has become increasingly visible. Despite these challenges, neoliberal restructuring justifications...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luisa Rossini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AESOP Association of the European Schools of Planning 2025-05-01
Series:PlaNext
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/planext/article/view/204
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850139439861334016
author Luisa Rossini
author_facet Luisa Rossini
author_sort Luisa Rossini
collection DOAJ
description In the context of the ongoing global intertwined financial, environmental, socio-political crises, the intricate relationship between neoliberal urban planning and the challenges these crises present has become increasingly visible. Despite these challenges, neoliberal restructuring justifications remain central to urban agendas and planning culture, often exacerbating social inequality. Its principles and related political decisions frequently intensify social conflicts, sparking protests as their adverse effects on marginalized communities and areas become evident, especially after decades of market-driven policies and the global financial crisis. In many cities around the globe, these popular rebellions, as local and residential activism, started increasingly to target varying regulatory regimes and strategies pursued by supranational, national, or local authorities, often organized as urban social movements. This think piece examines how neoliberal urbanism simultaneously incites resistance and absorbs it, reflecting a paradox where insurgent practices challenge the system but are also co-opted into its framework. By exploring key dynamics in urban governance, participation, and social movements, it seeks to understand how neoliberalism’s resilience lies in its ability to incorporate dissent into its operating logic while marginalizing radical alternatives, so to perpetuate its dominance despite widespread opposition. Briefly mentioning some examples of organized groups and forms of resistance around the globe, theoretical debates, and historical perspectives, the discussion unfolds by: analyzing how neoliberal practices shape urban governance and planning; investigating how movements resist neoliberalism and how their ideas are co-opted; addressing the enduring struggle over “to whom the city belongs” and proposing ways to foster meaningful democratic engagement.
format Article
id doaj-art-3a10a86dfae24d21afa3fcdca9babd06
institution OA Journals
issn 2468-0648
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher AESOP Association of the European Schools of Planning
record_format Article
series PlaNext
spelling doaj-art-3a10a86dfae24d21afa3fcdca9babd062025-08-20T02:30:18ZengAESOP Association of the European Schools of PlanningPlaNext2468-06482025-05-011410.24306/plnxt/100Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalismLuisa Rossini0ICS – University of Lisbon, Portugal In the context of the ongoing global intertwined financial, environmental, socio-political crises, the intricate relationship between neoliberal urban planning and the challenges these crises present has become increasingly visible. Despite these challenges, neoliberal restructuring justifications remain central to urban agendas and planning culture, often exacerbating social inequality. Its principles and related political decisions frequently intensify social conflicts, sparking protests as their adverse effects on marginalized communities and areas become evident, especially after decades of market-driven policies and the global financial crisis. In many cities around the globe, these popular rebellions, as local and residential activism, started increasingly to target varying regulatory regimes and strategies pursued by supranational, national, or local authorities, often organized as urban social movements. This think piece examines how neoliberal urbanism simultaneously incites resistance and absorbs it, reflecting a paradox where insurgent practices challenge the system but are also co-opted into its framework. By exploring key dynamics in urban governance, participation, and social movements, it seeks to understand how neoliberalism’s resilience lies in its ability to incorporate dissent into its operating logic while marginalizing radical alternatives, so to perpetuate its dominance despite widespread opposition. Briefly mentioning some examples of organized groups and forms of resistance around the globe, theoretical debates, and historical perspectives, the discussion unfolds by: analyzing how neoliberal practices shape urban governance and planning; investigating how movements resist neoliberalism and how their ideas are co-opted; addressing the enduring struggle over “to whom the city belongs” and proposing ways to foster meaningful democratic engagement. https://journals.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/planext/article/view/204neoliberal urbanismurban social movementsco-optationpost-political cityagonistic urbanismdemocracy
spellingShingle Luisa Rossini
Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism
PlaNext
neoliberal urbanism
urban social movements
co-optation
post-political city
agonistic urbanism
democracy
title Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism
title_full Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism
title_fullStr Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism
title_full_unstemmed Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism
title_short Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism
title_sort resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism
topic neoliberal urbanism
urban social movements
co-optation
post-political city
agonistic urbanism
democracy
url https://journals.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/planext/article/view/204
work_keys_str_mv AT luisarossini resistingandreinforcingneoliberalism