Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season

<p>Arctic sea ice has undergone significant changes over the past 50 years. Modern large-scale estimates of sea ice thickness and volume come from satellite observations. However, these estimates have limited accuracy, especially during the melt season, making it difficult to compare the Arcti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Salganik, O. Crabeck, N. Fuchs, N. Hutter, P. Anhaus, J. C. Landy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-03-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1259/2025/tc-19-1259-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849774239230459904
author E. Salganik
O. Crabeck
O. Crabeck
N. Fuchs
N. Hutter
N. Hutter
P. Anhaus
P. Anhaus
J. C. Landy
author_facet E. Salganik
O. Crabeck
O. Crabeck
N. Fuchs
N. Hutter
N. Hutter
P. Anhaus
P. Anhaus
J. C. Landy
author_sort E. Salganik
collection DOAJ
description <p>Arctic sea ice has undergone significant changes over the past 50 years. Modern large-scale estimates of sea ice thickness and volume come from satellite observations. However, these estimates have limited accuracy, especially during the melt season, making it difficult to compare the Arctic sea ice state year to year. Uncertainties in sea ice density lead to high uncertainties in ice thickness retrieval from its freeboard. During the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of the Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition, we observed a first-year ice (FYI) freeboard increase of 0.02 m, while its thickness decreased by 0.5 m during the Arctic melt season in June–July 2020. Over the same period, the FYI density decreased from 910 to 880 kg m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>, and the sea ice air fraction increased from 1 % to 6 %, due to air void expansion controlled by internal melt. This increase in air volume substantially affected FYI density and freeboard. Due to differences in sea ice thermodynamic state (such as salinity and temperature), the air volume expansion is less pronounced in second-year ice (SYI) and has a smaller impact on the density evolution of SYI and ridges. We validated our discrete measurements of FYI density from coring using co-located ice topography observations from underwater sonar and an airborne laser scanner. Despite decreasing ice thickness, a similar counterintuitive increasing ice freeboard was observed for the entire 0.9 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> MOSAiC ice floe, with a stronger freeboard increase for FYI than for less saline SYI. The surrounding 50 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> area experienced a slightly lower 0.01 m ice freeboard increase in July 2020, despite comparable 0.5 m melt rates obtained from ice mass balance buoys. The increasing sea ice air volume defines the rapid decrease in FYI density, complicates the retrieval of ice thickness from satellite altimeters during the melt season, and underlines the importance of considering air volume and density changes in retrieval algorithms.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-3a0e0c6ebc694c7381bb94c968b3ec26
institution DOAJ
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj-art-3a0e0c6ebc694c7381bb94c968b3ec262025-08-20T03:01:47ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242025-03-01191259127810.5194/tc-19-1259-2025Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt seasonE. Salganik0O. Crabeck1O. Crabeck2N. Fuchs3N. Hutter4N. Hutter5P. Anhaus6P. Anhaus7J. C. Landy8Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, NorwayChemical Oceanography Unit, Université de Liège, Liège, BelgiumLaboratoire de Glaciologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, BelgiumInstitute of Oceanography, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, GermanyAlfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, GermanyAlfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, GermanyInstitut für den Schutz maritimer Infrastrukturen, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V., Bremerhaven, GermanyDepartment of Physics and Technology, UiT Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway<p>Arctic sea ice has undergone significant changes over the past 50 years. Modern large-scale estimates of sea ice thickness and volume come from satellite observations. However, these estimates have limited accuracy, especially during the melt season, making it difficult to compare the Arctic sea ice state year to year. Uncertainties in sea ice density lead to high uncertainties in ice thickness retrieval from its freeboard. During the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of the Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition, we observed a first-year ice (FYI) freeboard increase of 0.02 m, while its thickness decreased by 0.5 m during the Arctic melt season in June–July 2020. Over the same period, the FYI density decreased from 910 to 880 kg m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>, and the sea ice air fraction increased from 1 % to 6 %, due to air void expansion controlled by internal melt. This increase in air volume substantially affected FYI density and freeboard. Due to differences in sea ice thermodynamic state (such as salinity and temperature), the air volume expansion is less pronounced in second-year ice (SYI) and has a smaller impact on the density evolution of SYI and ridges. We validated our discrete measurements of FYI density from coring using co-located ice topography observations from underwater sonar and an airborne laser scanner. Despite decreasing ice thickness, a similar counterintuitive increasing ice freeboard was observed for the entire 0.9 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> MOSAiC ice floe, with a stronger freeboard increase for FYI than for less saline SYI. The surrounding 50 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> area experienced a slightly lower 0.01 m ice freeboard increase in July 2020, despite comparable 0.5 m melt rates obtained from ice mass balance buoys. The increasing sea ice air volume defines the rapid decrease in FYI density, complicates the retrieval of ice thickness from satellite altimeters during the melt season, and underlines the importance of considering air volume and density changes in retrieval algorithms.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1259/2025/tc-19-1259-2025.pdf
spellingShingle E. Salganik
O. Crabeck
O. Crabeck
N. Fuchs
N. Hutter
N. Hutter
P. Anhaus
P. Anhaus
J. C. Landy
Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season
The Cryosphere
title Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season
title_full Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season
title_fullStr Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season
title_short Impacts of air fraction increase on Arctic sea ice density, freeboard, and thickness estimation during the melt season
title_sort impacts of air fraction increase on arctic sea ice density freeboard and thickness estimation during the melt season
url https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1259/2025/tc-19-1259-2025.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT esalganik impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT ocrabeck impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT ocrabeck impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT nfuchs impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT nhutter impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT nhutter impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT panhaus impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT panhaus impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason
AT jclandy impactsofairfractionincreaseonarcticseaicedensityfreeboardandthicknessestimationduringthemeltseason