Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysis
BackgroundHSip Osteoporotic fractures are common complications with high mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). It remains unclear whether surgical or conservative should be adopted for hip fractures in MHD patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted in Tianjin H...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Surgery |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1471101/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850175037122805760 |
|---|---|
| author | Man-Yu Zhang Wei Song Jing-Bo Wang Rui-Qian Lv Fu-Hao Zhao Ding-Wei Yang |
| author_facet | Man-Yu Zhang Wei Song Jing-Bo Wang Rui-Qian Lv Fu-Hao Zhao Ding-Wei Yang |
| author_sort | Man-Yu Zhang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BackgroundHSip Osteoporotic fractures are common complications with high mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). It remains unclear whether surgical or conservative should be adopted for hip fractures in MHD patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted in Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University from August 2019 to August 2023. A total of 43 MHD patients with hip fracture were included, with 30 cases in the surgical group and 13 cases in the conservative group. The differences in cumulative survival rates, time to first ambulation, Harris score, Barthel index, and incidence of complications were compared.ResultsThe surgical group had remarkable lower mortality rates as compared with the conservative group at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24 months (13.33 VS. 38.46%, 26.67 VS. 53.85%, 26.67 VS. 53.85%, 26.67 VS. 61.54%, 26.67 VS. 61.54%, and 26.67 VS. 69.23%). In the surgical treatment group, the first ambulation time was reduced to 28 (26) days, which was superior to the conservative group (134.17 ± 43.18 days, P < 0.001). The Harris score at 1 month (61.50 ± 4.10) and the Barthel index at 3 months (95, 11.25) were also significantly higher (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the surgical group had a significantly lower overall incidence of complications (60.00 vs. 92.31%, P = 0.034). The risk of death and complications of surgical treatment was only 23.0 and 32.4% of conservative treatment in MHD patients with hip fracture.ConclusionSurgical treatment is effective and safe and should be the first choice for hip fracture in MHD patients. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-39d5fd06046f4fa2b881e025e737832c |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2296-875X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Surgery |
| spelling | doaj-art-39d5fd06046f4fa2b881e025e737832c2025-08-20T02:19:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2024-12-011110.3389/fsurg.2024.14711011471101Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysisMan-Yu Zhang0Wei Song1Jing-Bo Wang2Rui-Qian Lv3Fu-Hao Zhao4Ding-Wei Yang5Department of Nephrology, Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Hip Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaBackgroundHSip Osteoporotic fractures are common complications with high mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). It remains unclear whether surgical or conservative should be adopted for hip fractures in MHD patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted in Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University from August 2019 to August 2023. A total of 43 MHD patients with hip fracture were included, with 30 cases in the surgical group and 13 cases in the conservative group. The differences in cumulative survival rates, time to first ambulation, Harris score, Barthel index, and incidence of complications were compared.ResultsThe surgical group had remarkable lower mortality rates as compared with the conservative group at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24 months (13.33 VS. 38.46%, 26.67 VS. 53.85%, 26.67 VS. 53.85%, 26.67 VS. 61.54%, 26.67 VS. 61.54%, and 26.67 VS. 69.23%). In the surgical treatment group, the first ambulation time was reduced to 28 (26) days, which was superior to the conservative group (134.17 ± 43.18 days, P < 0.001). The Harris score at 1 month (61.50 ± 4.10) and the Barthel index at 3 months (95, 11.25) were also significantly higher (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the surgical group had a significantly lower overall incidence of complications (60.00 vs. 92.31%, P = 0.034). The risk of death and complications of surgical treatment was only 23.0 and 32.4% of conservative treatment in MHD patients with hip fracture.ConclusionSurgical treatment is effective and safe and should be the first choice for hip fracture in MHD patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1471101/fullmaintenance hemodialysisosteoporosiship fracturesurgical treatmenthip arthroplasty |
| spellingShingle | Man-Yu Zhang Wei Song Jing-Bo Wang Rui-Qian Lv Fu-Hao Zhao Ding-Wei Yang Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysis Frontiers in Surgery maintenance hemodialysis osteoporosis hip fracture surgical treatment hip arthroplasty |
| title | Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysis |
| title_full | Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysis |
| title_fullStr | Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysis |
| title_short | Surgical vs. conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective analysis |
| title_sort | surgical vs conservative treatment for hip osteoporotic fracture in maintenance hemodialysis patients a retrospective analysis |
| topic | maintenance hemodialysis osteoporosis hip fracture surgical treatment hip arthroplasty |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1471101/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT manyuzhang surgicalvsconservativetreatmentforhiposteoporoticfractureinmaintenancehemodialysispatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT weisong surgicalvsconservativetreatmentforhiposteoporoticfractureinmaintenancehemodialysispatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT jingbowang surgicalvsconservativetreatmentforhiposteoporoticfractureinmaintenancehemodialysispatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT ruiqianlv surgicalvsconservativetreatmentforhiposteoporoticfractureinmaintenancehemodialysispatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT fuhaozhao surgicalvsconservativetreatmentforhiposteoporoticfractureinmaintenancehemodialysispatientsaretrospectiveanalysis AT dingweiyang surgicalvsconservativetreatmentforhiposteoporoticfractureinmaintenancehemodialysispatientsaretrospectiveanalysis |