Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiques
The HyperThesau and Bibracte numérique projects have given rise to a collective effort centred on the use of vocabulary as a means of ensuring the interoperability of archaeological data throughout their life cycle. To this end, the use of the standardised form of the thesaurus – via the Opentheso p...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Humanistica
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Humanités Numériques |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/revuehn/3119 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841549864845967360 |
|---|---|
| author | Sébastien Durost Guillaume Reich Jean-Pierre Girard |
| author_facet | Sébastien Durost Guillaume Reich Jean-Pierre Girard |
| author_sort | Sébastien Durost |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The HyperThesau and Bibracte numérique projects have given rise to a collective effort centred on the use of vocabulary as a means of ensuring the interoperability of archaeological data throughout their life cycle. To this end, the use of the standardised form of the thesaurus – via the Opentheso platform – provides a tool that is already adapted to linked data. Nevertheless, its use quickly raised the question of the different paradigms presiding over the elaboration of a specific vocabulary by each (group of) scientist(s). The ISO 25964 standard – designed for the management and interoperability of indexing languages – is flexible enough to permit the comparison and linking of different scientific or documentary “points of view”. Their coherence through interoperability alignments nevertheless requires to interface different semantic granularities: search reporting, the description of raw data, a gateway or “pivot” between the two, by using a regulated cooperation methodology. The challenges that remain to be met on this path do not prevent the thesaurus tool from already being a suitable support for a complete “human-to-machine-to-human” interoperability, developed within the framework of the Bibracte ville ouverte project and exemplified through a published research on the ceramics of that archaeological site. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-39ba12aaff2546128b2c924cc447c7ab |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2736-2337 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Humanistica |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Humanités Numériques |
| spelling | doaj-art-39ba12aaff2546128b2c924cc447c7ab2025-01-10T12:52:22ZfraHumanisticaHumanités Numériques2736-23372022-12-01610.4000/revuehn.3119Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiquesSébastien DurostGuillaume ReichJean-Pierre GirardThe HyperThesau and Bibracte numérique projects have given rise to a collective effort centred on the use of vocabulary as a means of ensuring the interoperability of archaeological data throughout their life cycle. To this end, the use of the standardised form of the thesaurus – via the Opentheso platform – provides a tool that is already adapted to linked data. Nevertheless, its use quickly raised the question of the different paradigms presiding over the elaboration of a specific vocabulary by each (group of) scientist(s). The ISO 25964 standard – designed for the management and interoperability of indexing languages – is flexible enough to permit the comparison and linking of different scientific or documentary “points of view”. Their coherence through interoperability alignments nevertheless requires to interface different semantic granularities: search reporting, the description of raw data, a gateway or “pivot” between the two, by using a regulated cooperation methodology. The challenges that remain to be met on this path do not prevent the thesaurus tool from already being a suitable support for a complete “human-to-machine-to-human” interoperability, developed within the framework of the Bibracte ville ouverte project and exemplified through a published research on the ceramics of that archaeological site.https://journals.openedition.org/revuehn/3119terminologythesaurusarchaeologyinteroperabilityusage analysis |
| spellingShingle | Sébastien Durost Guillaume Reich Jean-Pierre Girard Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiques Humanités Numériques terminology thesaurus archaeology interoperability usage analysis |
| title | Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiques |
| title_full | Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiques |
| title_fullStr | Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiques |
| title_full_unstemmed | Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiques |
| title_short | Terminologies, modèles de données archéologiques et thésaurus documentaires : réflexions à partir d’une typologie de céramiques |
| title_sort | terminologies modeles de donnees archeologiques et thesaurus documentaires reflexions a partir d une typologie de ceramiques |
| topic | terminology thesaurus archaeology interoperability usage analysis |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/revuehn/3119 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sebastiendurost terminologiesmodelesdedonneesarcheologiquesetthesaurusdocumentairesreflexionsapartirdunetypologiedeceramiques AT guillaumereich terminologiesmodelesdedonneesarcheologiquesetthesaurusdocumentairesreflexionsapartirdunetypologiedeceramiques AT jeanpierregirard terminologiesmodelesdedonneesarcheologiquesetthesaurusdocumentairesreflexionsapartirdunetypologiedeceramiques |