Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western Europe

In certain traditions of lower mythology, alongside depictions of guardian spirits, protectors of the natural landscape (including flora, fauna, elemental forces, diseases, and spheres of activity) there is mention of an anthropomorphic figure commonly referred to as the “wild man.” This being is be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sergei Yuryevich Neklyudov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta 2024-12-01
Series:Вопросы ономастики
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onomastics.ru/en/content/2024-volume-21-issue-3-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850050693702877184
author Sergei Yuryevich Neklyudov
author_facet Sergei Yuryevich Neklyudov
author_sort Sergei Yuryevich Neklyudov
collection DOAJ
description In certain traditions of lower mythology, alongside depictions of guardian spirits, protectors of the natural landscape (including flora, fauna, elemental forces, diseases, and spheres of activity) there is mention of an anthropomorphic figure commonly referred to as the “wild man.” This being is believed to inhabit areas untouched by human development, occasionally encountering nearby populations. According to local traditions, the “wild man” is described as a creature of flesh and blood, distinct from all categories of “spirits” but not entirely akin to either animals or humans. His image is found in various cultural expressions, including folklore, ancient and medieval texts, visual art, ritual practices, and performances. Although the “wild man” is known by different names across regions, these variations reflect a limited number of conceptual models, each highlighting a single dominant characteristic. Examining these models allows researchers to defi ne the semantic field in which this image was formed, identify specific ethnic and cultural types, reconstruct historical connections, and ultimately trace the origins and development of the concept of “wildness.” These names also possess notable onomastic potential: they may give rise to toponyms (often oronyms) associated with particular natural landmarks or lead to the “personalization” of the “wild man.” In this context, the figure may represent an outsider living beyond their community or take on the role of a mythological “guardian” of other wild creatures in the region. Thus, the “generic” designation of the wild man can evolve into a kind of proper name.
format Article
id doaj-art-39aff55abdf34dd3a7269c6576255c84
institution DOAJ
issn 1994-2400
1994-2451
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta
record_format Article
series Вопросы ономастики
spelling doaj-art-39aff55abdf34dd3a7269c6576255c842025-08-20T02:53:22ZrusIzdatelstvo Uralskogo UniversitetaВопросы ономастики1994-24001994-24512024-12-01213709210.15826/vopr_onom.2024.21.3.032Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western EuropeSergei Yuryevich Neklyudov0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4165-4604Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia; Presidential Academy of National Economy, Moscow, RussiaIn certain traditions of lower mythology, alongside depictions of guardian spirits, protectors of the natural landscape (including flora, fauna, elemental forces, diseases, and spheres of activity) there is mention of an anthropomorphic figure commonly referred to as the “wild man.” This being is believed to inhabit areas untouched by human development, occasionally encountering nearby populations. According to local traditions, the “wild man” is described as a creature of flesh and blood, distinct from all categories of “spirits” but not entirely akin to either animals or humans. His image is found in various cultural expressions, including folklore, ancient and medieval texts, visual art, ritual practices, and performances. Although the “wild man” is known by different names across regions, these variations reflect a limited number of conceptual models, each highlighting a single dominant characteristic. Examining these models allows researchers to defi ne the semantic field in which this image was formed, identify specific ethnic and cultural types, reconstruct historical connections, and ultimately trace the origins and development of the concept of “wildness.” These names also possess notable onomastic potential: they may give rise to toponyms (often oronyms) associated with particular natural landmarks or lead to the “personalization” of the “wild man.” In this context, the figure may represent an outsider living beyond their community or take on the role of a mythological “guardian” of other wild creatures in the region. Thus, the “generic” designation of the wild man can evolve into a kind of proper name.https://onomastics.ru/en/content/2024-volume-21-issue-3-3demononymyforest peoplemountain peoplemythologynaming patternsonymizationwild man
spellingShingle Sergei Yuryevich Neklyudov
Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western Europe
Вопросы ономастики
demononymy
forest people
mountain people
mythology
naming patterns
onymization
wild man
title Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western Europe
title_full Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western Europe
title_fullStr Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western Europe
title_full_unstemmed Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western Europe
title_short Essay on Comparative Demononymy: The “Wild People” of Central and Western Europe
title_sort essay on comparative demononymy the wild people of central and western europe
topic demononymy
forest people
mountain people
mythology
naming patterns
onymization
wild man
url https://onomastics.ru/en/content/2024-volume-21-issue-3-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sergeiyuryevichneklyudov essayoncomparativedemononymythewildpeopleofcentralandwesterneurope