Le Rousseau de Cassirer
The way Ernst Cassirer understands Jean-Jacques Rousseau at the beginning of the 1930’s is interesting, in so far as it puts forward different mechanisms of interpretation, which Cassirer is not always conscious of. On the one hand, Cassirer claims to have a fresh and neutral interpretation of Rouss...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
2018-06-01
|
| Series: | Astérion |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/3151 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849734343772078080 |
|---|---|
| author | Laetitia Simonetta |
| author_facet | Laetitia Simonetta |
| author_sort | Laetitia Simonetta |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The way Ernst Cassirer understands Jean-Jacques Rousseau at the beginning of the 1930’s is interesting, in so far as it puts forward different mechanisms of interpretation, which Cassirer is not always conscious of. On the one hand, Cassirer claims to have a fresh and neutral interpretation of Rousseau’s works, going above divergent contemporaneous interpretations. On the other hand, his thought is actually determined by his personal philosophical formation, that is to say the neokantism of the Marburg School, and above all by the political context. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-39a47aac700b448892966c588bc8fcee |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1762-6110 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2018-06-01 |
| publisher | École Normale Supérieure de Lyon |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Astérion |
| spelling | doaj-art-39a47aac700b448892966c588bc8fcee2025-08-20T03:07:48ZfraÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonAstérion1762-61102018-06-011810.4000/asterion.3151Le Rousseau de CassirerLaetitia SimonettaThe way Ernst Cassirer understands Jean-Jacques Rousseau at the beginning of the 1930’s is interesting, in so far as it puts forward different mechanisms of interpretation, which Cassirer is not always conscious of. On the one hand, Cassirer claims to have a fresh and neutral interpretation of Rousseau’s works, going above divergent contemporaneous interpretations. On the other hand, his thought is actually determined by his personal philosophical formation, that is to say the neokantism of the Marburg School, and above all by the political context.https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/3151RousseauCassirerhistory of receptionsrationalismsentiment |
| spellingShingle | Laetitia Simonetta Le Rousseau de Cassirer Astérion Rousseau Cassirer history of receptions rationalism sentiment |
| title | Le Rousseau de Cassirer |
| title_full | Le Rousseau de Cassirer |
| title_fullStr | Le Rousseau de Cassirer |
| title_full_unstemmed | Le Rousseau de Cassirer |
| title_short | Le Rousseau de Cassirer |
| title_sort | le rousseau de cassirer |
| topic | Rousseau Cassirer history of receptions rationalism sentiment |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/3151 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT laetitiasimonetta lerousseaudecassirer |