Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis

This study investigates the semantics and pragmatics of the German keyword “Kollektiv” based on its actual uses in public discourse and by political actors. “Kollektiv” is regarded as a concept of greatsocial significance, yet it is also a most controversial notion. It relates to the universal value...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeria Chernyavskaya, Sergei Nefedov
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Istanbul University Press 2022-12-01
Series:Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/C4753E89FC314FFCA3C657B59CA79A0C
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849315499262869504
author Valeria Chernyavskaya
Sergei Nefedov
author_facet Valeria Chernyavskaya
Sergei Nefedov
author_sort Valeria Chernyavskaya
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the semantics and pragmatics of the German keyword “Kollektiv” based on its actual uses in public discourse and by political actors. “Kollektiv” is regarded as a concept of greatsocial significance, yet it is also a most controversial notion. It relates to the universal values and benefits of collectivism such as mutual assistance, solidarity, effective cooperation when coping with difficulties, mutual support and sympathy. However, otherfeatures of collectivism such as having to integrate oneself into the community, setting equal boundaries for individuals, and invading people’s privacy activate negative meanings. This governs the evaluation-based polysemy of the keyword. The explanatory approach in this paper was formulated against the background of deontic meaning as a basic concept in semantics to analyze social evaluation of salient lexis. On par with their descriptive meaning, keywords have a deontic meaning component that their denotational interpretability depends on.The study was carried out as corpus-driven discourse analytical research. Discourse analysis proceeded as noncritical linguistic discourse analysis. To provide a functional perspective on Kollektiv, the “Digital Dictionary of the German Language” / “Das Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache” was used with its two sections of dictionaries and text corpora. Two specialized corpora from the “Digital dictionary” were employed: the “Corona corpus” that contains electronic texts with over 50 mln tokens on the coronavirus pandemic, and the corpus “Political Speeches” containing records of proceedings of the government bodies of German speaking countries and regions as well as transcripts of oral speeches delivered by politicians. We show that the word “Kollektiv”is employed both as description and as evaluation setting up both positive and negative deontics. The deontic polysemy of “Kollektiv” is activated in contextual uses. The conducted study addresses the way in which linguistic forms get integrated in larger activities in the social world and how, through salient lexicalizations in discourse, they open up the perspective to social diversity and polyphony.
format Article
id doaj-art-399507a6a11344fb9f4131adc46cd431
institution Kabale University
issn 2619-9890
language deu
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur
spelling doaj-art-399507a6a11344fb9f4131adc46cd4312025-08-20T03:52:07ZdeuIstanbul University PressStudien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur2619-98902022-12-01487711010.26650/sdsl2022-1167962123456Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse AnalysisValeria Chernyavskaya0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6039-6305Sergei Nefedov1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-7702St. Petersburg State Politechnical University, St.-Petersburg, RussiaSt. Petersburg State Politechnical University, St.-Petersburg, RussiaThis study investigates the semantics and pragmatics of the German keyword “Kollektiv” based on its actual uses in public discourse and by political actors. “Kollektiv” is regarded as a concept of greatsocial significance, yet it is also a most controversial notion. It relates to the universal values and benefits of collectivism such as mutual assistance, solidarity, effective cooperation when coping with difficulties, mutual support and sympathy. However, otherfeatures of collectivism such as having to integrate oneself into the community, setting equal boundaries for individuals, and invading people’s privacy activate negative meanings. This governs the evaluation-based polysemy of the keyword. The explanatory approach in this paper was formulated against the background of deontic meaning as a basic concept in semantics to analyze social evaluation of salient lexis. On par with their descriptive meaning, keywords have a deontic meaning component that their denotational interpretability depends on.The study was carried out as corpus-driven discourse analytical research. Discourse analysis proceeded as noncritical linguistic discourse analysis. To provide a functional perspective on Kollektiv, the “Digital Dictionary of the German Language” / “Das Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache” was used with its two sections of dictionaries and text corpora. Two specialized corpora from the “Digital dictionary” were employed: the “Corona corpus” that contains electronic texts with over 50 mln tokens on the coronavirus pandemic, and the corpus “Political Speeches” containing records of proceedings of the government bodies of German speaking countries and regions as well as transcripts of oral speeches delivered by politicians. We show that the word “Kollektiv”is employed both as description and as evaluation setting up both positive and negative deontics. The deontic polysemy of “Kollektiv” is activated in contextual uses. The conducted study addresses the way in which linguistic forms get integrated in larger activities in the social world and how, through salient lexicalizations in discourse, they open up the perspective to social diversity and polyphony.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/C4753E89FC314FFCA3C657B59CA79A0Ckollektivdeontic meaningcorpus-driven discourse analysiscoronavirus pandemic discoursepolitical discourse
spellingShingle Valeria Chernyavskaya
Sergei Nefedov
Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis
Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur
kollektiv
deontic meaning
corpus-driven discourse analysis
coronavirus pandemic discourse
political discourse
title Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis
title_full Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis
title_fullStr Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis
title_short Are We on Our Own or Pressed into ein Kollektiv? The Keyword Pragmatic Trajectory in the German Public and Political Discourse: Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis
title_sort are we on our own or pressed into ein kollektiv the keyword pragmatic trajectory in the german public and political discourse corpus driven discourse analysis
topic kollektiv
deontic meaning
corpus-driven discourse analysis
coronavirus pandemic discourse
political discourse
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/C4753E89FC314FFCA3C657B59CA79A0C
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriachernyavskaya areweonourownorpressedintoeinkollektivthekeywordpragmatictrajectoryinthegermanpublicandpoliticaldiscoursecorpusdrivendiscourseanalysis
AT sergeinefedov areweonourownorpressedintoeinkollektivthekeywordpragmatictrajectoryinthegermanpublicandpoliticaldiscoursecorpusdrivendiscourseanalysis