Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review
BackgroundDigital health portals are online platforms allowing individuals to access their personal information and communicate with health care providers. While digital health portals have been associated with improved health outcomes and more streamlined health care process...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Cancer |
| Online Access: | https://cancer.jmir.org/2025/1/e72862 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850096722330517504 |
|---|---|
| author | Steven Ouellet Florian Naye Wilfried Supper Chloé Cachinho Marie-Pierre Gagnon Annie LeBlanc Marie-Claude Laferrière Simon Décary Maxime Sasseville |
| author_facet | Steven Ouellet Florian Naye Wilfried Supper Chloé Cachinho Marie-Pierre Gagnon Annie LeBlanc Marie-Claude Laferrière Simon Décary Maxime Sasseville |
| author_sort | Steven Ouellet |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundDigital health portals are online platforms allowing individuals to access their personal information and communicate with health care providers. While digital health portals have been associated with improved health outcomes and more streamlined health care processes, their impact on individuals living with or beyond cancer remains underexplored.
ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to (1) identify the portal functionalities reported in studies involving individuals living with or beyond cancer, as well as the outcomes assessed, and (2) explore the diversity of participant characteristics and potential factors associated with portal use.
MethodsWe conducted a scoping review in accordance with the JBI methodology (formerly the Joanna Briggs Institute) and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We included primary research studies published between 2014 and 2024 that involved participants living with or beyond cancer, had access to personal health information, and assessed at least one outcome related to health or the health care system. We searched the Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid), and CINAHL Plus with Full Text databases. Five reviewers independently screened all titles, abstracts, and full texts in duplicate using Covidence. We extracted data on study design, participant characteristics, portal functionalities, outcomes assessed, and PROGRESS-Plus (place of residence; race, ethnicity, culture, or language; occupation; gender or sex; religion; education; socioeconomic status; and social capital–Plus) equity factors.
ResultsWe included 44 studies; most were conducted in the United States (n=30, 68%) and used quantitative (n=23, 52%), mixed methods (n=11, 25%), or qualitative (n=10, 23%) designs. The most common portal features were access to test results (28/44, 64%) and secure messaging (30/44, 68%). Frequently reported services included appointment-related functions (19/44, 43%), educational resources (13/44, 30%), and prescription management features (11/44, 25%). Behavioral and technology-related outcomes were the most frequently assessed (37/44, 84%), followed by system-level (19/44, 43%), psychosocial (16/44, 36%), and clinical outcomes (5/44, 11%). Overall, 43% (19/44) of the studies addressed PROGRESS-Plus factors. Age was the most frequently reported (13/19, 68%), followed by socioeconomic status (10/19, 53%), race or ethnicity (7/19, 37%), and gender or sex (7/19, 37%). Social capital (2/19, 11%), occupation (1/19, 5%), and disability (1/19, 5%) were rarely considered, and religion was not reported in any study.
ConclusionsWhile digital health portals enhance patient engagement, their clinical impact and equity implications remain insufficiently evaluated. We found disparities in functionalities, outcomes, and PROGRESS-Plus representation. To promote equitable benefits, future studies should adopt inclusive designs and evaluation strategies that address diverse outcomes and integrate social determinants of health. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-393d23e69ea74808ba7b42c9eb04827f |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2369-1999 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Cancer |
| spelling | doaj-art-393d23e69ea74808ba7b42c9eb04827f2025-08-20T02:41:10ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Cancer2369-19992025-07-0111e7286210.2196/72862Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping ReviewSteven Ouellethttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-0043Florian Nayehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-7018Wilfried Supperhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-6642-5768Chloé Cachinhohttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-5290-0938Marie-Pierre Gagnonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0782-5457Annie LeBlanchttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-8102Marie-Claude Laferrièrehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2820-1387Simon Décaryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-5672Maxime Sassevillehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-1414 BackgroundDigital health portals are online platforms allowing individuals to access their personal information and communicate with health care providers. While digital health portals have been associated with improved health outcomes and more streamlined health care processes, their impact on individuals living with or beyond cancer remains underexplored. ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to (1) identify the portal functionalities reported in studies involving individuals living with or beyond cancer, as well as the outcomes assessed, and (2) explore the diversity of participant characteristics and potential factors associated with portal use. MethodsWe conducted a scoping review in accordance with the JBI methodology (formerly the Joanna Briggs Institute) and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We included primary research studies published between 2014 and 2024 that involved participants living with or beyond cancer, had access to personal health information, and assessed at least one outcome related to health or the health care system. We searched the Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid), and CINAHL Plus with Full Text databases. Five reviewers independently screened all titles, abstracts, and full texts in duplicate using Covidence. We extracted data on study design, participant characteristics, portal functionalities, outcomes assessed, and PROGRESS-Plus (place of residence; race, ethnicity, culture, or language; occupation; gender or sex; religion; education; socioeconomic status; and social capital–Plus) equity factors. ResultsWe included 44 studies; most were conducted in the United States (n=30, 68%) and used quantitative (n=23, 52%), mixed methods (n=11, 25%), or qualitative (n=10, 23%) designs. The most common portal features were access to test results (28/44, 64%) and secure messaging (30/44, 68%). Frequently reported services included appointment-related functions (19/44, 43%), educational resources (13/44, 30%), and prescription management features (11/44, 25%). Behavioral and technology-related outcomes were the most frequently assessed (37/44, 84%), followed by system-level (19/44, 43%), psychosocial (16/44, 36%), and clinical outcomes (5/44, 11%). Overall, 43% (19/44) of the studies addressed PROGRESS-Plus factors. Age was the most frequently reported (13/19, 68%), followed by socioeconomic status (10/19, 53%), race or ethnicity (7/19, 37%), and gender or sex (7/19, 37%). Social capital (2/19, 11%), occupation (1/19, 5%), and disability (1/19, 5%) were rarely considered, and religion was not reported in any study. ConclusionsWhile digital health portals enhance patient engagement, their clinical impact and equity implications remain insufficiently evaluated. We found disparities in functionalities, outcomes, and PROGRESS-Plus representation. To promote equitable benefits, future studies should adopt inclusive designs and evaluation strategies that address diverse outcomes and integrate social determinants of health.https://cancer.jmir.org/2025/1/e72862 |
| spellingShingle | Steven Ouellet Florian Naye Wilfried Supper Chloé Cachinho Marie-Pierre Gagnon Annie LeBlanc Marie-Claude Laferrière Simon Décary Maxime Sasseville Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review JMIR Cancer |
| title | Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review |
| title_full | Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review |
| title_fullStr | Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review |
| title_short | Digital Health Portals for Individuals Living With or Beyond Cancer: Patient-Driven Scoping Review |
| title_sort | digital health portals for individuals living with or beyond cancer patient driven scoping review |
| url | https://cancer.jmir.org/2025/1/e72862 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stevenouellet digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT floriannaye digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT wilfriedsupper digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT chloecachinho digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT mariepierregagnon digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT annieleblanc digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT marieclaudelaferriere digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT simondecary digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview AT maximesasseville digitalhealthportalsforindividualslivingwithorbeyondcancerpatientdrivenscopingreview |