A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling
<p>Questions of landscape scale in coupled channel–hillslope landscape evolution have been a significant focus of geomorphological research for decades. Studies to date have suggested a characteristic landscape length that marks the shift from fluvial channels to hillslopes, limiting fluvial i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Earth Surface Dynamics |
| Online Access: | https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/13/403/2025/esurf-13-403-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850154643466747904 |
|---|---|
| author | B. Kargère B. Kargère J. Constantine T. Hales S. Grieve S. Grieve S. Johnson |
| author_facet | B. Kargère B. Kargère J. Constantine T. Hales S. Grieve S. Grieve S. Johnson |
| author_sort | B. Kargère |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Questions of landscape scale in coupled channel–hillslope landscape evolution have been a significant focus of geomorphological research for decades. Studies to date have suggested a characteristic landscape length that marks the shift from fluvial channels to hillslopes, limiting fluvial incision and setting the length of hillslopes. The representation of real-world landscapes in slope–area plots, however, makes it challenging to identify the exact transition from hillslopes to channels, owing to the existence of an intermediary colluvial valley region. Without a rigorous explanation for the scaling of the channel hillslope transition, the use of computational models, which are forced to implement a finite grid resolution, is limited by the scaling of the physical parameters of the model relative to the grid resolution. Grid resolution is also tied to the width of channels, which is undetermined without a rigorous explanation of where channels begin.</p>
<p>Building on existing work, we demonstrate the existence and implications of the characteristic landscape length and its relationship to grid resolution. We derive the characteristic landscape length as the horizontal length in a one-dimensional landscape evolution framework required to form an inflection point. On a two-dimensional domain, channel heads form in steady state at the characteristic area, the square of the characteristic length, independent of grid resolution. We present a box-counting fractal definition using the grid resolution, revealing that the dimension of the contributing drainage region on steady-state hillslopes is expressed as a multifractal system. In sum, channels have contributing drainage areas, therefore a dimension of 2, whereas, by definition, unchannelized locations or nodes have a dimension between zero and 2, so not a well-defined area. This conceptualization aligns with the scaling of channel width as the square root of drainage area. Since channel heads form at a resolution-independent drainage area, the width of channel heads is not explicitly defined, suggesting that the grid resolution is analogous to the property of channel head width in real-world landscapes, influenced by the particle size. We substantiate this theory with topographic analyses of Gabilan Mesa, California. These findings clarify several unresolved properties of channel–hillslope coupling, with potential for substantially improving the accuracy of coupled landscape evolution models in replicating landscape forms.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-392fe526dc1f4297b8cc87c08f0bb37e |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2196-6311 2196-632X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Earth Surface Dynamics |
| spelling | doaj-art-392fe526dc1f4297b8cc87c08f0bb37e2025-08-20T02:25:15ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2025-05-011340341510.5194/esurf-13-403-2025A fractal framework for channel–hillslope couplingB. Kargère0B. Kargère1J. Constantine2T. Hales3S. Grieve4S. Grieve5S. Johnson6Department of Mathematics, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USADepartment of Geosciences, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USADepartment of Geosciences, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USASchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF10 3ATSchool of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, E1 4NSDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, E1 1HHDepartment of Mathematics, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USA<p>Questions of landscape scale in coupled channel–hillslope landscape evolution have been a significant focus of geomorphological research for decades. Studies to date have suggested a characteristic landscape length that marks the shift from fluvial channels to hillslopes, limiting fluvial incision and setting the length of hillslopes. The representation of real-world landscapes in slope–area plots, however, makes it challenging to identify the exact transition from hillslopes to channels, owing to the existence of an intermediary colluvial valley region. Without a rigorous explanation for the scaling of the channel hillslope transition, the use of computational models, which are forced to implement a finite grid resolution, is limited by the scaling of the physical parameters of the model relative to the grid resolution. Grid resolution is also tied to the width of channels, which is undetermined without a rigorous explanation of where channels begin.</p> <p>Building on existing work, we demonstrate the existence and implications of the characteristic landscape length and its relationship to grid resolution. We derive the characteristic landscape length as the horizontal length in a one-dimensional landscape evolution framework required to form an inflection point. On a two-dimensional domain, channel heads form in steady state at the characteristic area, the square of the characteristic length, independent of grid resolution. We present a box-counting fractal definition using the grid resolution, revealing that the dimension of the contributing drainage region on steady-state hillslopes is expressed as a multifractal system. In sum, channels have contributing drainage areas, therefore a dimension of 2, whereas, by definition, unchannelized locations or nodes have a dimension between zero and 2, so not a well-defined area. This conceptualization aligns with the scaling of channel width as the square root of drainage area. Since channel heads form at a resolution-independent drainage area, the width of channel heads is not explicitly defined, suggesting that the grid resolution is analogous to the property of channel head width in real-world landscapes, influenced by the particle size. We substantiate this theory with topographic analyses of Gabilan Mesa, California. These findings clarify several unresolved properties of channel–hillslope coupling, with potential for substantially improving the accuracy of coupled landscape evolution models in replicating landscape forms.</p>https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/13/403/2025/esurf-13-403-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | B. Kargère B. Kargère J. Constantine T. Hales S. Grieve S. Grieve S. Johnson A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling Earth Surface Dynamics |
| title | A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling |
| title_full | A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling |
| title_fullStr | A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling |
| title_full_unstemmed | A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling |
| title_short | A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling |
| title_sort | fractal framework for channel hillslope coupling |
| url | https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/13/403/2025/esurf-13-403-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bkargere afractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT bkargere afractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT jconstantine afractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT thales afractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT sgrieve afractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT sgrieve afractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT sjohnson afractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT bkargere fractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT bkargere fractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT jconstantine fractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT thales fractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT sgrieve fractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT sgrieve fractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling AT sjohnson fractalframeworkforchannelhillslopecoupling |