Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature

This essay presents a polemic against the anthropology of literature. The author examines the relation between the ethics of interpretation and the discourse of the anthropology of literature as well as cultural studies. She also shows theoretical conditions under which a textual subject appears to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aldona Kopkiewicz
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University 2013-01-01
Series:Przestrzenie Teorii
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/3320
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850188336344334336
author Aldona Kopkiewicz
author_facet Aldona Kopkiewicz
author_sort Aldona Kopkiewicz
collection DOAJ
description This essay presents a polemic against the anthropology of literature. The author examines the relation between the ethics of interpretation and the discourse of the anthropology of literature as well as cultural studies. She also shows theoretical conditions under which a textual subject appears to be weak and passive and thus becomes just a field in which a researcher can inscribe various cultural identities. In this way a researcher tries to restitute the subject after its poststructural “death”, but he/she might do that only by mediation through social and cultural identities, which he/she actually examines. On the practical level this entanglement causes a situation in which writers and artists create works that fulfill institutional expectations. It would be therefore necessary to establish to what extent an anthropological approach towards a text enables us to invent new models of subjectivity. Without this it would be difficult to consider literary/cultural studies to be a truly critical discipline based on independent, yet collaborative reflection to be found in theoretical and artistic texts alike.
format Article
id doaj-art-3928ca1494b643e0899f022dc2ecd1f8
institution OA Journals
issn 1644-6763
2450-5765
language Polish
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University
record_format Article
series Przestrzenie Teorii
spelling doaj-art-3928ca1494b643e0899f022dc2ecd1f82025-08-20T02:15:54ZpolAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPrzestrzenie Teorii1644-67632450-57652013-01-0119254010.14746/pt.2013.19.23291Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literatureAldona KopkiewiczThis essay presents a polemic against the anthropology of literature. The author examines the relation between the ethics of interpretation and the discourse of the anthropology of literature as well as cultural studies. She also shows theoretical conditions under which a textual subject appears to be weak and passive and thus becomes just a field in which a researcher can inscribe various cultural identities. In this way a researcher tries to restitute the subject after its poststructural “death”, but he/she might do that only by mediation through social and cultural identities, which he/she actually examines. On the practical level this entanglement causes a situation in which writers and artists create works that fulfill institutional expectations. It would be therefore necessary to establish to what extent an anthropological approach towards a text enables us to invent new models of subjectivity. Without this it would be difficult to consider literary/cultural studies to be a truly critical discipline based on independent, yet collaborative reflection to be found in theoretical and artistic texts alike.http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/3320teoria interpretacjiantropologia literaturyetyka czytaniakrytykatożsamość kulturowa
spellingShingle Aldona Kopkiewicz
Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature
Przestrzenie Teorii
teoria interpretacji
antropologia literatury
etyka czytania
krytyka
tożsamość kulturowa
title Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature
title_full Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature
title_fullStr Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature
title_full_unstemmed Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature
title_short Passive writers and understanding critics. Institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature
title_sort passive writers and understanding critics institution and interpretation in the research field of the anthropology of literature
topic teoria interpretacji
antropologia literatury
etyka czytania
krytyka
tożsamość kulturowa
url http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/3320
work_keys_str_mv AT aldonakopkiewicz passivewritersandunderstandingcriticsinstitutionandinterpretationintheresearchfieldoftheanthropologyofliterature