Sequential biases on subjective judgments: Evidence from face attractiveness and ringtone agreeableness judgment.

When people make decisions about sequentially presented items in psychophysical experiments, their decisions are always biased by their preceding decisions and the preceding items, either by assimilation (shift towards the decision or item) or contrast (shift away from the decision or item). Such se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianrui Huang, Xianyou He, Xiaojin Ma, Yian Ren, Tingting Zhao, Xin Zeng, Han Li, Yiheng Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://storage.googleapis.com/plos-corpus-prod/10.1371/journal.pone.0198723/1/pone.0198723.pdf?X-Goog-Algorithm=GOOG4-RSA-SHA256&X-Goog-Credential=wombat-sa%40plos-prod.iam.gserviceaccount.com%2F20210218%2Fauto%2Fstorage%2Fgoog4_request&X-Goog-Date=20210218T104911Z&X-Goog-Expires=3600&X-Goog-SignedHeaders=host&X-Goog-Signature=c64c5e78ddbca6b1864e10612542db9227ade6a3726ef4a552c85a06e7dd6ee9ab2c30256531b8119248c4b5cf1532e7a14e20ff93813f59117ebe6eaa01f1ea470b40c71791311c431c26e0b286f2fbad1c7f057e9db7fb4c97c80ada6c85b46f4c63c424032c072f11a5e0664ea262d533ac5eb3d88055c1b9f7aec578172fac4644e1d0782753f87d52bcf64090eb12a433213622c9f01cd91e5fd123237440cd75c152750c7147eee847f803eebab4a2958418de2105e938424289f85f5e2e1d02ee7d35a3e33503f9fc66d2b6e499dfa381b24a45cf72f7f3e88402e20a382b871d326e3ae5f4a0cc38ee256f52e9701730c919d243c25cb2dafca878ea
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When people make decisions about sequentially presented items in psychophysical experiments, their decisions are always biased by their preceding decisions and the preceding items, either by assimilation (shift towards the decision or item) or contrast (shift away from the decision or item). Such sequential biases also occur in naturalistic and real-world judgments such as facial attractiveness judgments. In this article, we aimed to cast light on the causes of these sequential biases. We first found significant assimilative and contrastive effects in a visual face attractiveness judgment task and an auditory ringtone agreeableness judgment task, indicating that sequential effects are not limited to the visual modality. We then found that the provision of trial-by-trial feedback of the preceding stimulus value eliminated the contrastive effect, but only weakened the assimilative effect. When participants orally reported their judgments rather than indicated them via a keyboard button press, we found a significant diminished assimilative effect, suggesting that motor response repetition strengthened the assimilation bias. Finally, we found that when visual and auditory stimuli were alternated, there was no longer a contrastive effect from the immediately previous trial, but there was an assimilative effect both from the previous trial (cross-modal) and the 2-back trial (same stimulus modality). These findings suggested that the contrastive effect results from perceptual processing, while the assimilative effect results from anchoring of the previous judgment and is strengthened by response repetition and numerical priming.
ISSN:1932-6203