Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric data
Purpose: This research investigates key global initiatives related to Industry 4.0, such as Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Made in China 2025, and the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP). The aim is to define their scope from an academic perspective, exploring their interconnections and relevance w...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
OmniaScience
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/article/view/8587 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849395782230212608 |
|---|---|
| author | Sandra Ramos-Gutiérrez Isabel García-Gutiérrez |
| author_facet | Sandra Ramos-Gutiérrez Isabel García-Gutiérrez |
| author_sort | Sandra Ramos-Gutiérrez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose: This research investigates key global initiatives related to Industry 4.0, such as Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Made in China 2025, and the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP). The aim is to define their scope from an academic perspective, exploring their interconnections and relevance within the context of digital and green transformation in major industrial economies.
Design/methodology/approach: We adopted a Systematic Review (SR) approach to analyze existing literature on the selected industrial initiatives. The study follows the stages proposed by Denyer and Tranfield, which include planning, conducting, and reporting the review. Three research questions were formulated, and a methodology was designed to investigate the characteristic topics within each industrial initiative.
Findings: The findings reveal that Industry 4.0 remains the most prominent theme in academic discourse. However, Industry 5.0 has shown a strong upward trend since its inception. Keyword analysis indicates that both Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 are predominantly technology-driven, though Industry 5.0 places greater emphasis on human interaction and sustainability. In contrast, Society 5.0, Made in China 2025, and the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP) have less relevance in the academic literature.
Originality/value: This research contributes to the academic understanding of global industrial policies by systematically comparing major initiatives. We propose a methodology to analyze the content of each industrial initiative based on a structured analysis of author keywords, offering valuable insights into these initiatives. By synthesizing a large body of literature, the study establishes a foundation for further research on the evolution of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3908b4e879fe402fb802868954d2229b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2013-8423 2013-0953 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | OmniaScience |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management |
| spelling | doaj-art-3908b4e879fe402fb802868954d2229b2025-08-20T03:39:31ZengOmniaScienceJournal of Industrial Engineering and Management2013-84232013-09532025-07-0118232834110.3926/jiem.8587789Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric dataSandra Ramos-Gutiérrez0Isabel García-Gutiérrez1Universidad Carlos III de MadridUniversidad Carlos III de MadridPurpose: This research investigates key global initiatives related to Industry 4.0, such as Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Made in China 2025, and the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP). The aim is to define their scope from an academic perspective, exploring their interconnections and relevance within the context of digital and green transformation in major industrial economies. Design/methodology/approach: We adopted a Systematic Review (SR) approach to analyze existing literature on the selected industrial initiatives. The study follows the stages proposed by Denyer and Tranfield, which include planning, conducting, and reporting the review. Three research questions were formulated, and a methodology was designed to investigate the characteristic topics within each industrial initiative. Findings: The findings reveal that Industry 4.0 remains the most prominent theme in academic discourse. However, Industry 5.0 has shown a strong upward trend since its inception. Keyword analysis indicates that both Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 are predominantly technology-driven, though Industry 5.0 places greater emphasis on human interaction and sustainability. In contrast, Society 5.0, Made in China 2025, and the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP) have less relevance in the academic literature. Originality/value: This research contributes to the academic understanding of global industrial policies by systematically comparing major initiatives. We propose a methodology to analyze the content of each industrial initiative based on a structured analysis of author keywords, offering valuable insights into these initiatives. By synthesizing a large body of literature, the study establishes a foundation for further research on the evolution of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0.https://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/article/view/8587industry 4.0, industry 5.0, made in china 2025, society 5.0., advanced manufacturing partnership, keyword analysis |
| spellingShingle | Sandra Ramos-Gutiérrez Isabel García-Gutiérrez Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric data Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management industry 4.0, industry 5.0, made in china 2025, society 5.0., advanced manufacturing partnership, keyword analysis |
| title | Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric data |
| title_full | Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric data |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric data |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric data |
| title_short | Comparison of Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and related political initiatives using bibliometric data |
| title_sort | comparison of industry 4 0 industry 5 0 and related political initiatives using bibliometric data |
| topic | industry 4.0, industry 5.0, made in china 2025, society 5.0., advanced manufacturing partnership, keyword analysis |
| url | https://www.jiem.org/index.php/jiem/article/view/8587 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sandraramosgutierrez comparisonofindustry40industry50andrelatedpoliticalinitiativesusingbibliometricdata AT isabelgarciagutierrez comparisonofindustry40industry50andrelatedpoliticalinitiativesusingbibliometricdata |