Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?

Abstract This article argues that there is one issue that can be useful in expounding the “Berlioz problem”, namely our obliviousness to how the musical work is not only constituted by, but also continuously caught in, a meander of acts. We might call this the “acticity” of the musical w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erlend Hovland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian University Press 2019-01-01
Series:Studia Musicologica Norvegica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/smn/2019/01/whos_afraid_of_berlioz
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850256429205684224
author Erlend Hovland
author_facet Erlend Hovland
author_sort Erlend Hovland
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This article argues that there is one issue that can be useful in expounding the “Berlioz problem”, namely our obliviousness to how the musical work is not only constituted by, but also continuously caught in, a meander of acts. We might call this the “acticity” of the musical work. The acticity of Berlioz’s music is defined by his use of the guitar as a composing tool.     The article follows how acts of playing and composing on the guitar are inscribed in the score and how the physicality of these acts is still present and creates the specificity of the orchestral writing, and further, how this “impure” materiality demands new modes of development. The acts do not simply condition the orchestral writing, they are present in, and constitute the particularity of, the score; but more importantly, they may even illuminate an ontological character of every musical work, its acticity.
format Article
id doaj-art-390835d1a5c94933bbca6715a3d8ab87
institution OA Journals
issn 0332-5024
1504-2960
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Scandinavian University Press
record_format Article
series Studia Musicologica Norvegica
spelling doaj-art-390835d1a5c94933bbca6715a3d8ab872025-08-20T01:56:39ZengScandinavian University PressStudia Musicologica Norvegica0332-50241504-29602019-01-014593010.18261/issn.1504-2960-2019-01-0318948693Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?Erlend HovlandAbstract This article argues that there is one issue that can be useful in expounding the “Berlioz problem”, namely our obliviousness to how the musical work is not only constituted by, but also continuously caught in, a meander of acts. We might call this the “acticity” of the musical work. The acticity of Berlioz’s music is defined by his use of the guitar as a composing tool.     The article follows how acts of playing and composing on the guitar are inscribed in the score and how the physicality of these acts is still present and creates the specificity of the orchestral writing, and further, how this “impure” materiality demands new modes of development. The acts do not simply condition the orchestral writing, they are present in, and constitute the particularity of, the score; but more importantly, they may even illuminate an ontological character of every musical work, its acticity.https://www.idunn.no/smn/2019/01/whos_afraid_of_berliozActicityBerlioz and the guitarpractice studiesguitar as composing toolBerliozandtheguitarpracticestudies
spellingShingle Erlend Hovland
Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?
Studia Musicologica Norvegica
Acticity
Berlioz and the guitar
practice studies
guitar as composing tool
Berliozandtheguitar
practicestudies
title Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?
title_full Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?
title_fullStr Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?
title_full_unstemmed Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?
title_short Who’s Afraid of Berlioz?
title_sort who s afraid of berlioz
topic Acticity
Berlioz and the guitar
practice studies
guitar as composing tool
Berliozandtheguitar
practicestudies
url https://www.idunn.no/smn/2019/01/whos_afraid_of_berlioz
work_keys_str_mv AT erlendhovland whosafraidofberlioz