Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation

Abstract The field of bioelectronic medicine has advanced rapidly from rudimentary electrical therapies to cutting-edge closed-loop systems that integrate real-time physiological monitoring with adaptive neuromodulation. Early innovations, such as cardiac pacemakers and deep brain stimulation, paved...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Imanuel Lerman, Yifeng Bu, Rahul Singh, Harold A. Silverman, Anuj Bhardwaj, Alex J. Mann, Alik Widge, Joseph Palin, Christopher Puleo, Hubert Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Bioelectronic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-024-00163-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585484367298560
author Imanuel Lerman
Yifeng Bu
Rahul Singh
Harold A. Silverman
Anuj Bhardwaj
Alex J. Mann
Alik Widge
Joseph Palin
Christopher Puleo
Hubert Lim
author_facet Imanuel Lerman
Yifeng Bu
Rahul Singh
Harold A. Silverman
Anuj Bhardwaj
Alex J. Mann
Alik Widge
Joseph Palin
Christopher Puleo
Hubert Lim
author_sort Imanuel Lerman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The field of bioelectronic medicine has advanced rapidly from rudimentary electrical therapies to cutting-edge closed-loop systems that integrate real-time physiological monitoring with adaptive neuromodulation. Early innovations, such as cardiac pacemakers and deep brain stimulation, paved the way for these sophisticated technologies. This review traces the historical and technological progression of bioelectronic medicine, culminating in the emerging potential of closed-loop devices for multiple disorders of the brain and body. We emphasize both invasive techniques, such as implantable devices for brain, spinal cord and autonomic regulation, while we introduce new prospects for non-invasive neuromodulation, including focused ultrasound and newly developed autonomic neurography enabling precise detection and titration of inflammatory immune responses. The case for closed-loop non-invasive autonomic neuromodulation (incorporating autonomic neurography and splenic focused ultrasound stimulation) is presented through its applications in conditions such as sepsis and chronic inflammation, illustrating its capacity to revolutionize personalized healthcare. Today, invasive or non-invasive closed-loop systems have yet to be developed that dynamically modulate autonomic nervous system function by responding to real-time physiological and molecular signals; it represents a transformative approach to therapeutic interventions and major opportunity by which the bioelectronic field may advance. Knowledge gaps remain and likely contribute to the lack of available closed loop autonomic neuromodulation systems, namely, (1) significant exogenous and endogenous noise that must be filtered out, (2) potential drift in the signal due to temporal change in disease severity and/or therapy induced neuroplasticity, and (3) confounding effects of exogenous therapies (e.g., concurrent medications that dysregulate autonomic nervous system functions). Leveraging continuous feedback and real-time adjustments may overcome many of these barriers, and these next generation systems have the potential to stand at the forefront of precision medicine, offering new avenues for individualized and adaptive treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-38fdd04fb42f4cbfa988b0bc43386b51
institution Kabale University
issn 2332-8886
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Bioelectronic Medicine
spelling doaj-art-38fdd04fb42f4cbfa988b0bc43386b512025-01-26T12:45:03ZengBMCBioelectronic Medicine2332-88862025-01-0111111810.1186/s42234-024-00163-4Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulationImanuel Lerman0Yifeng Bu1Rahul Singh2Harold A. Silverman3Anuj Bhardwaj4Alex J. Mann5Alik Widge6Joseph Palin7Christopher Puleo8Hubert Lim9Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San DiegoInflammaSense Incorporated Head QuartersInflammaSense Incorporated Head QuartersWolf Greenfield Biotechnology Practice GroupSecondWave Systems Incorporated, Head QuartershVIVO Limited, Head QuartersDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of MinnesotaConvergent Research Inc, Head QuartersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteSecondWave Systems Incorporated, Head QuartersAbstract The field of bioelectronic medicine has advanced rapidly from rudimentary electrical therapies to cutting-edge closed-loop systems that integrate real-time physiological monitoring with adaptive neuromodulation. Early innovations, such as cardiac pacemakers and deep brain stimulation, paved the way for these sophisticated technologies. This review traces the historical and technological progression of bioelectronic medicine, culminating in the emerging potential of closed-loop devices for multiple disorders of the brain and body. We emphasize both invasive techniques, such as implantable devices for brain, spinal cord and autonomic regulation, while we introduce new prospects for non-invasive neuromodulation, including focused ultrasound and newly developed autonomic neurography enabling precise detection and titration of inflammatory immune responses. The case for closed-loop non-invasive autonomic neuromodulation (incorporating autonomic neurography and splenic focused ultrasound stimulation) is presented through its applications in conditions such as sepsis and chronic inflammation, illustrating its capacity to revolutionize personalized healthcare. Today, invasive or non-invasive closed-loop systems have yet to be developed that dynamically modulate autonomic nervous system function by responding to real-time physiological and molecular signals; it represents a transformative approach to therapeutic interventions and major opportunity by which the bioelectronic field may advance. Knowledge gaps remain and likely contribute to the lack of available closed loop autonomic neuromodulation systems, namely, (1) significant exogenous and endogenous noise that must be filtered out, (2) potential drift in the signal due to temporal change in disease severity and/or therapy induced neuroplasticity, and (3) confounding effects of exogenous therapies (e.g., concurrent medications that dysregulate autonomic nervous system functions). Leveraging continuous feedback and real-time adjustments may overcome many of these barriers, and these next generation systems have the potential to stand at the forefront of precision medicine, offering new avenues for individualized and adaptive treatment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-024-00163-4Closed loop bioelectronic medicineNeuromodulationBioelectronic medicineFocused ultrasound stimulationAutonomic neurographyNeurography
spellingShingle Imanuel Lerman
Yifeng Bu
Rahul Singh
Harold A. Silverman
Anuj Bhardwaj
Alex J. Mann
Alik Widge
Joseph Palin
Christopher Puleo
Hubert Lim
Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation
Bioelectronic Medicine
Closed loop bioelectronic medicine
Neuromodulation
Bioelectronic medicine
Focused ultrasound stimulation
Autonomic neurography
Neurography
title Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation
title_full Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation
title_fullStr Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation
title_full_unstemmed Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation
title_short Next generation bioelectronic medicine: making the case for non-invasive closed-loop autonomic neuromodulation
title_sort next generation bioelectronic medicine making the case for non invasive closed loop autonomic neuromodulation
topic Closed loop bioelectronic medicine
Neuromodulation
Bioelectronic medicine
Focused ultrasound stimulation
Autonomic neurography
Neurography
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-024-00163-4
work_keys_str_mv AT imanuellerman nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT yifengbu nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT rahulsingh nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT haroldasilverman nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT anujbhardwaj nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT alexjmann nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT alikwidge nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT josephpalin nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT christopherpuleo nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation
AT hubertlim nextgenerationbioelectronicmedicinemakingthecasefornoninvasiveclosedloopautonomicneuromodulation