Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)

ObjectiveTo analyze the related literature of self-reported outcomes of prostate cancer patients using bibliometric methods, and explore the research status and development trend in this field.MethodsThe literature related to self-reported outcomes of prostate cancer was searched in Web of Science c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiuxia Qin, Juan Liu, Na Zeng, Xiaoqin Xie, Fan Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fruro.2025.1574626/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405239144218624
author Qiuxia Qin
Juan Liu
Na Zeng
Xiaoqin Xie
Fan Yang
author_facet Qiuxia Qin
Juan Liu
Na Zeng
Xiaoqin Xie
Fan Yang
author_sort Qiuxia Qin
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo analyze the related literature of self-reported outcomes of prostate cancer patients using bibliometric methods, and explore the research status and development trend in this field.MethodsThe literature related to self-reported outcomes of prostate cancer was searched in Web of Science core database. The literature on prostate cancer self-reported outcomes was visualized using VOSviewer, CiteSpace and R software packages.ResultsA total of 1119 relevant literatures were retrieved. Annual output consistently exceeded 100 articles since 2018, peaking at 161 in 2022. The U.S. (47.2%) and U.K. (21.5%) contributed 68.7% of publications. The University of Michigan emerged as the most productive institution. Collaborative networks showed strong U.S.-European ties, while Asian engagement intensified post-2020.The journal International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (n=69) published most papers, whereas Journal of Clinical Oncology (n=48, citations=1,412) was most influential. Dual-map analysis revealed frequent citations from molecular/biology journals to clinical medicine literature. Barocas D.A., Cooperberg M.R., Koyama T., and Chen R.C. (21 publications each) were top producers. Ethan Basch (259 co-citations) was the most cited scholar. The EPIC scale development study (Wei et al., 2000) was the most co-cited reference. Key citation bursts included Taneja’s long-term outcomes study (2013-2018) and the CHHiP radiotherapy trial (2018-2021). “Quality of life” (181 occurrences) dominated keyword analysis, followed by “radiation therapy” and “prostatectomy.” Five thematic clusters emerged: radiotherapy with a blue cluster, prostatectomy with a green cluster, daily management with a red cluster, research methods with a yellow cluster and scale development with a purple cluster. Qualitative methods gained prominence after 2020, while exercise and radiotherapy remained sustained intervention focuses.ConclusionsThe reported outcomes of patients with prostate cancer have continued to receive attention in the past 10 years. In this study, three recognized bibliometric software were used for the first time to analyze the related studies on the reported outcomes of patients with prostate cancer, so as to provide reference and direction for future research.
format Article
id doaj-art-38f66ea3a3d046ea8907b01a5d3d4433
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-9828
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Urology
spelling doaj-art-38f66ea3a3d046ea8907b01a5d3d44332025-08-20T03:36:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Urology2673-98282025-08-01510.3389/fruro.2025.15746261574626Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)Qiuxia QinJuan LiuNa ZengXiaoqin XieFan YangObjectiveTo analyze the related literature of self-reported outcomes of prostate cancer patients using bibliometric methods, and explore the research status and development trend in this field.MethodsThe literature related to self-reported outcomes of prostate cancer was searched in Web of Science core database. The literature on prostate cancer self-reported outcomes was visualized using VOSviewer, CiteSpace and R software packages.ResultsA total of 1119 relevant literatures were retrieved. Annual output consistently exceeded 100 articles since 2018, peaking at 161 in 2022. The U.S. (47.2%) and U.K. (21.5%) contributed 68.7% of publications. The University of Michigan emerged as the most productive institution. Collaborative networks showed strong U.S.-European ties, while Asian engagement intensified post-2020.The journal International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (n=69) published most papers, whereas Journal of Clinical Oncology (n=48, citations=1,412) was most influential. Dual-map analysis revealed frequent citations from molecular/biology journals to clinical medicine literature. Barocas D.A., Cooperberg M.R., Koyama T., and Chen R.C. (21 publications each) were top producers. Ethan Basch (259 co-citations) was the most cited scholar. The EPIC scale development study (Wei et al., 2000) was the most co-cited reference. Key citation bursts included Taneja’s long-term outcomes study (2013-2018) and the CHHiP radiotherapy trial (2018-2021). “Quality of life” (181 occurrences) dominated keyword analysis, followed by “radiation therapy” and “prostatectomy.” Five thematic clusters emerged: radiotherapy with a blue cluster, prostatectomy with a green cluster, daily management with a red cluster, research methods with a yellow cluster and scale development with a purple cluster. Qualitative methods gained prominence after 2020, while exercise and radiotherapy remained sustained intervention focuses.ConclusionsThe reported outcomes of patients with prostate cancer have continued to receive attention in the past 10 years. In this study, three recognized bibliometric software were used for the first time to analyze the related studies on the reported outcomes of patients with prostate cancer, so as to provide reference and direction for future research.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fruro.2025.1574626/fullprostate cancerpatient reported outcomesbibliometricsCitespaceVOSviewerR package
spellingShingle Qiuxia Qin
Juan Liu
Na Zeng
Xiaoqin Xie
Fan Yang
Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)
Frontiers in Urology
prostate cancer
patient reported outcomes
bibliometrics
Citespace
VOSviewer
R package
title Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)
title_full Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)
title_fullStr Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)
title_short Knowledge map of self-reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023)
title_sort knowledge map of self reported outcomes in patients with prostate cancer a bibliometric analysis 2014 2023
topic prostate cancer
patient reported outcomes
bibliometrics
Citespace
VOSviewer
R package
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fruro.2025.1574626/full
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuxiaqin knowledgemapofselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithprostatecancerabibliometricanalysis20142023
AT juanliu knowledgemapofselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithprostatecancerabibliometricanalysis20142023
AT nazeng knowledgemapofselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithprostatecancerabibliometricanalysis20142023
AT xiaoqinxie knowledgemapofselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithprostatecancerabibliometricanalysis20142023
AT fanyang knowledgemapofselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithprostatecancerabibliometricanalysis20142023