The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective
Medical technologies, e-health and personalised medicine are rapidly changing the healthcare landscape. Successful implementation depends on interactions between the technology, the actors and the context. More traditional reductionistic approaches aim to understand isolated factors and linear cause...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Global Health |
| Online Access: | https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/12/e003858.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850168533465432064 |
|---|---|
| author | Jenneken Naaldenberg Noelle Aarts |
| author_facet | Jenneken Naaldenberg Noelle Aarts |
| author_sort | Jenneken Naaldenberg |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Medical technologies, e-health and personalised medicine are rapidly changing the healthcare landscape. Successful implementation depends on interactions between the technology, the actors and the context. More traditional reductionistic approaches aim to understand isolated factors and linear cause–effect relations and have difficulties in addressing inter-relatedness and interaction. Complexity theory offers a myriad of approaches that focus specifically on behaviour and mechanisms that emerge from interactions between involved actors and the environment. These approaches work from the assumption that change does not take place in isolation and that interaction and inter-relatedness are central concepts to study. However, developments are proceeding fast and along different lines. This can easily lead to confusion about differences and usefulness in clinical and healthcare research and practice. Next to this, reductionistic and complexity approaches have their own merits and much is to be gained from using both approaches complementary. To this end, we propose three lines in complexity research related to health innovation and discuss ways in which complexity approaches and reductionistic approaches can act compatibly and thereby strengthen research designs for developing, implementing and evaluating health innovations. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-38c43d6023ee4f59a9e15d60225d1bf9 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2059-7908 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Global Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-38c43d6023ee4f59a9e15d60225d1bf92025-08-20T02:20:57ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082020-12-0151210.1136/bmjgh-2020-003858The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspectiveJenneken Naaldenberg0Noelle Aarts1Primary and Community care, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, NetherlandsInstitute for Science in Society, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Gelderland, NetherlandsMedical technologies, e-health and personalised medicine are rapidly changing the healthcare landscape. Successful implementation depends on interactions between the technology, the actors and the context. More traditional reductionistic approaches aim to understand isolated factors and linear cause–effect relations and have difficulties in addressing inter-relatedness and interaction. Complexity theory offers a myriad of approaches that focus specifically on behaviour and mechanisms that emerge from interactions between involved actors and the environment. These approaches work from the assumption that change does not take place in isolation and that interaction and inter-relatedness are central concepts to study. However, developments are proceeding fast and along different lines. This can easily lead to confusion about differences and usefulness in clinical and healthcare research and practice. Next to this, reductionistic and complexity approaches have their own merits and much is to be gained from using both approaches complementary. To this end, we propose three lines in complexity research related to health innovation and discuss ways in which complexity approaches and reductionistic approaches can act compatibly and thereby strengthen research designs for developing, implementing and evaluating health innovations.https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/12/e003858.full |
| spellingShingle | Jenneken Naaldenberg Noelle Aarts The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective BMJ Global Health |
| title | The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective |
| title_full | The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective |
| title_fullStr | The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective |
| title_short | The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective |
| title_sort | compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective |
| url | https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/12/e003858.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jennekennaaldenberg thecompatibilityofreductionisticandcomplexityapproachesinasociomedicalinnovationperspective AT noelleaarts thecompatibilityofreductionisticandcomplexityapproachesinasociomedicalinnovationperspective AT jennekennaaldenberg compatibilityofreductionisticandcomplexityapproachesinasociomedicalinnovationperspective AT noelleaarts compatibilityofreductionisticandcomplexityapproachesinasociomedicalinnovationperspective |