Removal of PCDD/Fs and CBzs by different Air Pollution Control Devices in MSWIs

Abstract This study investigated the removal efficiencies of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and chlorobenzenes (CBzs) by different air pollution control devices (APCDs) in three municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs). These devices were the semi-dry...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tong Chen, Chen Sun, Tianjiao Wang, Mingxiu Zhan, Xiaodong Li, Shengyong Lu, Jianhua Yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2020-04-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.10.0536
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract This study investigated the removal efficiencies of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and chlorobenzenes (CBzs) by different air pollution control devices (APCDs) in three municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs). These devices were the semi-dry flue gas desulfurization (SDFGD) system, activated carbon (AC) injector, bag filters (BF), selective catalytic reduction (SCR) reactor, and wet scrubber. The SDFGD system, AC injector, and BF exhibited similar removal efficiencies for all of the pollutants. Overall, the removal efficiency of CBzs was also considerably lower than the PCDD/Fs. The less chlorinated CBzs were also less likely to be adsorbed by AC and BF and more likely to be decomposed by the SCR reactor. Additionally, the “memory effect” in the wet scrubbers elevated the concentrations of the PCDD/Fs and even the CBzs in the flue gas, with the highest increases observed for penta- to heptachlorinated PCDD/Fs and TrCBzs. Given the different effects of these various devices, especially the wet scrubber, the correlation between PCDD/F and CBz removal should be individually assessed for each APCD unit. More accurate indicators of PCDD/F removal are also examined.
ISSN:1680-8584
2071-1409