THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

The European Court of Human Rights has constantly highlighted the importance of Article 6 of the Convention and by a dynamic interpretation, the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court has gradually enriched the content and the practical impact of the treaty text, recognizing various additional guaran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexandra PANAIT
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2016-05-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2016_articles/index.php?dir=02_privat_law%2F&download=CKS+2016_private_law_art.036.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850051774333845504
author Alexandra PANAIT
author_facet Alexandra PANAIT
author_sort Alexandra PANAIT
collection DOAJ
description The European Court of Human Rights has constantly highlighted the importance of Article 6 of the Convention and by a dynamic interpretation, the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court has gradually enriched the content and the practical impact of the treaty text, recognizing various additional guarantees compared to those expressly provided for by the Convention, such as certain specific applications of the equity principle and the national court’s obligations of loyalty and compliance with the Convention, which represent essential elements of the general concept of a fair trial.
format Article
id doaj-art-388a4b28e1684bc9a23d94d64dd0106c
institution DOAJ
issn 2068-7796
2068-7796
language English
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
spelling doaj-art-388a4b28e1684bc9a23d94d64dd0106c2025-08-20T02:53:02ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962068-77962016-05-016-227231THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTSAlexandra PANAIT0PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, ”Nicolae Titulescu” University of BucharestThe European Court of Human Rights has constantly highlighted the importance of Article 6 of the Convention and by a dynamic interpretation, the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court has gradually enriched the content and the practical impact of the treaty text, recognizing various additional guarantees compared to those expressly provided for by the Convention, such as certain specific applications of the equity principle and the national court’s obligations of loyalty and compliance with the Convention, which represent essential elements of the general concept of a fair trial.http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2016_articles/index.php?dir=02_privat_law%2F&download=CKS+2016_private_law_art.036.pdfCEDHfair trialjurisprudencearticle 6.
spellingShingle Alexandra PANAIT
THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
CEDH
fair trial
jurisprudence
article 6.
title THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_full THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_fullStr THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_full_unstemmed THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_short THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_sort right to a fair trial in the dynamic interpretation of the european court of human rights
topic CEDH
fair trial
jurisprudence
article 6.
url http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2016_articles/index.php?dir=02_privat_law%2F&download=CKS+2016_private_law_art.036.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrapanait therighttoafairtrialinthedynamicinterpretationoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights
AT alexandrapanait righttoafairtrialinthedynamicinterpretationoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights