An investigation of the load-velocity relationship between flywheel eccentric and barbell training methods
ObjectiveFlywheel resistance training (FRT) is a training modality for developing lower limb athletic performance. The relationship between FRT load parameters and barbell squat loading remains ambiguous in practice, resulting in experience-driven load selection during training. Therefore, this stud...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1579291/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | ObjectiveFlywheel resistance training (FRT) is a training modality for developing lower limb athletic performance. The relationship between FRT load parameters and barbell squat loading remains ambiguous in practice, resulting in experience-driven load selection during training. Therefore, this study investigates optimal FRT loading for specific training goals (maximal strength, power, muscular endurance) by analyzing concentric velocity at varying barbell 1RM percentages (%1RM), establishes correlations between flywheel load, velocity, and %1RM, and integrates force-velocity profiling to develop evidence-based guidelines for individualized load prescription.MethodsThirty-nine participants completed 1RM barbell squats to establish submaximal loads (20–90%1RM). Concentric velocities were monitored via linear-position transducer (Gymaware) for FRT inertial load quantification, with test–retest measurements confirming protocol reliability. Simple and multiple linear regression modeled load-velocity interactions and multivariable relationships, while Pearson’s r and R2 quantified correlations and model fit. Predictive equations estimated inertial loads (kg·m2), supported by ICC (2, 1) and CV assessments of relative/absolute reliability.ResultsA strong inverse correlation (r = −0.88) and high linearity (R2 = 0.78) emerged between rotational inertia and velocity. The multivariate model demonstrated excellent fit (R2 = 0.81) and robust correlation (r = 0.90), yielding the predictive equation: y = 0.769–0.846v + 0.002 kg.ConclusionThe strong linear inertial load-velocity relationship enables individualized load prescription through regression equations incorporating velocity and strength parameters. While FRT demonstrates limited efficacy for developing speed-strength, its longitudinal periodization effects require further investigation. Optimal FRT loading ranges were identified: 40–60%1RM for strength-speed, 60–80%1RM for power development, and 80–100% + 1RM for maximal strength adaptations. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2296-2565 |