Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity
Contemporary science of complexity have a significant impact on ideas about the relationship between humans and the environment. They integrate the achievements of systems approach, cybernetics, synergetics, constructing an ontology of diversity, which requires a radical conceptual turn in episte...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2023/%D0%A2.8,%20%E2%84%961%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/118-126%20%D0%9E%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%9F.%20%D0%92..pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832570692567040000 |
|---|---|
| author | P. V. Opolev |
| author_facet | P. V. Opolev |
| author_sort | P. V. Opolev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Contemporary science of complexity have a significant impact on ideas about the
relationship between humans and the environment. They integrate the achievements
of systems approach, cybernetics, synergetics, constructing an ontology of
diversity, which requires a radical conceptual turn in epistemology. Enactivism is an
under-appreciated epistemological strategy that proceeds from notions of complex
self-organising systems, the kinds of relationship between the knower and the
knowable. Declaring the functional equality of subject and object, enactivism shows
similarities with some of the new ontology principles — anti-sensationalism, antireductionism and heterogeneity. According to the new ontologies and enactivism,
the human being is not a self-contained ‘selfness’. Under enactivism, man is given
the most ‘ecological’ strategy for knowing diversity. This strategy covers not only
the ‘ecology’ of impersonal self-organising systems, but also the human mind,
including the principles of complex thinking. The closest to science of complexity
is the position of autopoiesis enactivism, which avoids the extremes of biologism,
psychologism, solipsism, and schematism in the cognition of diversity. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-387800f2c22f46b9bb252e6e88d26b2c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2542-0488 2541-7983 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
| spelling | doaj-art-387800f2c22f46b9bb252e6e88d26b2c2025-02-02T14:23:05ZengOmsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher EducationОмский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"2542-04882541-79832023-02-018111812610.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-1-118-126Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexityP. V. Opolev0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-0975Omsk State Technical UniversityContemporary science of complexity have a significant impact on ideas about the relationship between humans and the environment. They integrate the achievements of systems approach, cybernetics, synergetics, constructing an ontology of diversity, which requires a radical conceptual turn in epistemology. Enactivism is an under-appreciated epistemological strategy that proceeds from notions of complex self-organising systems, the kinds of relationship between the knower and the knowable. Declaring the functional equality of subject and object, enactivism shows similarities with some of the new ontology principles — anti-sensationalism, antireductionism and heterogeneity. According to the new ontologies and enactivism, the human being is not a self-contained ‘selfness’. Under enactivism, man is given the most ‘ecological’ strategy for knowing diversity. This strategy covers not only the ‘ecology’ of impersonal self-organising systems, but also the human mind, including the principles of complex thinking. The closest to science of complexity is the position of autopoiesis enactivism, which avoids the extremes of biologism, psychologism, solipsism, and schematism in the cognition of diversity.https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2023/%D0%A2.8,%20%E2%84%961%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/118-126%20%D0%9E%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%9F.%20%D0%92..pdfcomplexityscience of complexitynew ontologiescorporealityphilosophy of complexityenactivism |
| spellingShingle | P. V. Opolev Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" complexity science of complexity new ontologies corporeality philosophy of complexity enactivism |
| title | Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity |
| title_full | Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity |
| title_fullStr | Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity |
| title_short | Enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity |
| title_sort | enactivism as an epistemology for science of complexity |
| topic | complexity science of complexity new ontologies corporeality philosophy of complexity enactivism |
| url | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2023/%D0%A2.8,%20%E2%84%961%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/118-126%20%D0%9E%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%9F.%20%D0%92..pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pvopolev enactivismasanepistemologyforscienceofcomplexity |