Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Infants

Background. The purpose of this study of preterm infants was to test the effect of four approaches to the time of transition from gavage to full oral feedings, time to discharge, and weight gain during the transition. Methods. A randomized experimental design was used with four intervention groups:...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rita H. Pickler, Barbara A. Reyna, Paul A. Wetzel, Mary Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Nursing Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/716828
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554274998976512
author Rita H. Pickler
Barbara A. Reyna
Paul A. Wetzel
Mary Lewis
author_facet Rita H. Pickler
Barbara A. Reyna
Paul A. Wetzel
Mary Lewis
author_sort Rita H. Pickler
collection DOAJ
description Background. The purpose of this study of preterm infants was to test the effect of four approaches to the time of transition from gavage to full oral feedings, time to discharge, and weight gain during the transition. Methods. A randomized experimental design was used with four intervention groups: early start (32 weeks’ postmenstrual age)/slow progressing experience (gradually increasing oral feedings offered per day); early start/maximum experience (oral feedings offered at every feeding opportunity); late start (34 weeks’ postmenstrual age)/slow progressing experience; and late start/maximum experience. Results. The analysis included 86 preterm infants. Once oral feedings were initiated, infants in the late start/maximum experience group achieved full oral feeding and were discharged to home significantly sooner than infants in either early start group. Although not significantly different, these infants also achieved these outcomes sooner than infants in the late start/slow progressing experience group. There were no differences in weight gain across groups. Conclusions. Results suggest starting oral feedings later in preterm infants may result in more rapid transition to full oral feedings and discharge although not at early postnatal ages. Provision of a more consistent approach to oral feeding may support infant neurodevelopment and reduce length of hospitalization.
format Article
id doaj-art-386ed7e39fda4b47aaa3176d97ba36a9
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1429
2090-1437
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Nursing Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-386ed7e39fda4b47aaa3176d97ba36a92025-02-03T05:51:55ZengWileyNursing Research and Practice2090-14292090-14372015-01-01201510.1155/2015/716828716828Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm InfantsRita H. Pickler0Barbara A. Reyna1Paul A. Wetzel2Mary Lewis3Nursing Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 11016, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USANeonatal Nurse Practitioner, Children’s Hospital of Richmond at VCU, P.O. Box 985912, Richmond, VA 23298, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 843067, Richmond, VA 23284-3067, USAChildren’s Hospital of Richmond at VCU, P.O. Box 985912, Richmond, VA 23298, USABackground. The purpose of this study of preterm infants was to test the effect of four approaches to the time of transition from gavage to full oral feedings, time to discharge, and weight gain during the transition. Methods. A randomized experimental design was used with four intervention groups: early start (32 weeks’ postmenstrual age)/slow progressing experience (gradually increasing oral feedings offered per day); early start/maximum experience (oral feedings offered at every feeding opportunity); late start (34 weeks’ postmenstrual age)/slow progressing experience; and late start/maximum experience. Results. The analysis included 86 preterm infants. Once oral feedings were initiated, infants in the late start/maximum experience group achieved full oral feeding and were discharged to home significantly sooner than infants in either early start group. Although not significantly different, these infants also achieved these outcomes sooner than infants in the late start/slow progressing experience group. There were no differences in weight gain across groups. Conclusions. Results suggest starting oral feedings later in preterm infants may result in more rapid transition to full oral feedings and discharge although not at early postnatal ages. Provision of a more consistent approach to oral feeding may support infant neurodevelopment and reduce length of hospitalization.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/716828
spellingShingle Rita H. Pickler
Barbara A. Reyna
Paul A. Wetzel
Mary Lewis
Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Infants
Nursing Research and Practice
title Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Infants
title_full Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Infants
title_fullStr Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Infants
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Infants
title_short Effect of Four Approaches to Oral Feeding Progression on Clinical Outcomes in Preterm Infants
title_sort effect of four approaches to oral feeding progression on clinical outcomes in preterm infants
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/716828
work_keys_str_mv AT ritahpickler effectoffourapproachestooralfeedingprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinpreterminfants
AT barbaraareyna effectoffourapproachestooralfeedingprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinpreterminfants
AT paulawetzel effectoffourapproachestooralfeedingprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinpreterminfants
AT marylewis effectoffourapproachestooralfeedingprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinpreterminfants