Real‐world comparative effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus RAS inhibition alone in patients with de novo heart failure

Abstract Aims Large‐scale, real‐world data on early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients newly diagnosed (de novo) with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are limited. We examined the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ankeet S. Bhatt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Barada P. Jena, Sylwia Suminska, Carlos Eid, Heike Schwende, Michele Senni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15183
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Aims Large‐scale, real‐world data on early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients newly diagnosed (de novo) with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are limited. We examined the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) on all‐cause and cause‐specific hospitalizations among patients with de novo HFrEF from the Optum® dataset in the United States. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with de novo HFrEF (diagnosed ≤30 days) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% who were first prescribed with sacubitril/valsartan or ACEi/ARB from 1 January 2016 to 31 March 2020. The primary endpoint (all‐cause hospitalization) and secondary endpoints were analysed in propensity score‐matched cohorts. Results A cohort of 3290 patients with de novo HFrEF who were prescribed with sacubitril/valsartan and a propensity‐matched cohort of 6580 patients who were prescribed with ACEi/ARB were analysed. Overall, the mean (SD) age of patients was 63 (14) years, 34% were women, and baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups. Hypertension (67%), diabetes (33%) and chronic kidney disease (28%) were highly prevalent comorbidities. Patients in the sacubitril/valsartan cohort when compared with the ACEi/ARB cohort had lower annual rates of all‐cause hospitalizations [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75–0.89, P < 0.001], cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (IRR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73–0.87, P < 0.001) and HF hospitalizations (IRR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78–0.95, P = 0.002). Conclusions Among patients with de novo HFrEF, sacubitril/valsartan (compared with that of ACEi/ARB) was associated with fewer all‐cause, CV and HF hospitalizations. These findings are consistent with clinical trial evidence suggesting potential benefits of early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF, including those soon after diagnosis.
ISSN:2055-5822