Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies

Aim/backgroundDynamic PET imaging requires an input function typically obtained through blood sampling. Image-derived input functions (IDIFs) of the ascending aorta (AA), aortic arch, descending aorta (DA), or left ventricle (LV) offer non-invasive alternatives, especially with long-axial field-of-v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte L. C. Smith, Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen, Marijke E. den Hollander, Henricus N. J. M. Greuter, Nienke R. Gerards, Josée Zijlstra, C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Idris Bahce, Maqsood Yaqub, Ronald Boellaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnume.2025.1556848/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850043911020478464
author Charlotte L. C. Smith
Charlotte L. C. Smith
Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
Marijke E. den Hollander
Henricus N. J. M. Greuter
Henricus N. J. M. Greuter
Nienke R. Gerards
Nienke R. Gerards
Josée Zijlstra
Josée Zijlstra
C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Idris Bahce
Idris Bahce
Maqsood Yaqub
Maqsood Yaqub
Ronald Boellaard
Ronald Boellaard
author_facet Charlotte L. C. Smith
Charlotte L. C. Smith
Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
Marijke E. den Hollander
Henricus N. J. M. Greuter
Henricus N. J. M. Greuter
Nienke R. Gerards
Nienke R. Gerards
Josée Zijlstra
Josée Zijlstra
C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Idris Bahce
Idris Bahce
Maqsood Yaqub
Maqsood Yaqub
Ronald Boellaard
Ronald Boellaard
author_sort Charlotte L. C. Smith
collection DOAJ
description Aim/backgroundDynamic PET imaging requires an input function typically obtained through blood sampling. Image-derived input functions (IDIFs) of the ascending aorta (AA), aortic arch, descending aorta (DA), or left ventricle (LV) offer non-invasive alternatives, especially with long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems enabling whole-body dynamic 1⁸F-FDG imaging. This study aimed to validate uncorrected IDIFs derived from the AA, DA, aortic arch, and LV by comparing them to (late) venous whole-blood in patients undergoing LAFOV PET/CT.MethodsEleven oncology patients who underwent 70-min dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT scans on a LAFOV PET/CT system after receiving an intravenous bolus injection of 3.0 MBq/kg were included. Seven venous blood samples were collected manually at approximately 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 45, and 60 min post-injection (pi) and compared to IDIFs derived from the AA, aortic arch, DA, and LV. Bias between IDIFs and venous blood samples was assessed at each time point.ResultsIDIF accuracy relative to venous blood samples improved over time, with a median percentage bias <10% after 25 min pi. At 60 min pi, the aortic arch showed the smallest bias (median −1.1%, IQR 5.9%), followed by the AA (2.5%, IQR 7.0%), DA (5.1%, IQR 8.6%), and LV (7.4%, IQR 7.6%).ConclusionThe high precision of aorta-derived IDIFs suggests that IDIFs are a reliable alternative to manual blood sampling for dynamic 18F-FDG PET imaging on a LAFOV PET/CT system. Using IDIFs reduces variability, simplifies protocols, minimizes radiation exposure, and enhances patient safety with a non-invasive approach.
format Article
id doaj-art-3822b4f5389c42bb84e82632e93e46d4
institution DOAJ
issn 2673-8880
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj-art-3822b4f5389c42bb84e82632e93e46d42025-08-20T02:55:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine2673-88802025-02-01510.3389/fnume.2025.15568481556848Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studiesCharlotte L. C. Smith0Charlotte L. C. Smith1Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen2Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen3Marijke E. den Hollander4Henricus N. J. M. Greuter5Henricus N. J. M. Greuter6Nienke R. Gerards7Nienke R. Gerards8Josée Zijlstra9Josée Zijlstra10C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt11C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt12Idris Bahce13Idris Bahce14Maqsood Yaqub15Maqsood Yaqub16Ronald Boellaard17Ronald Boellaard18Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsAim/backgroundDynamic PET imaging requires an input function typically obtained through blood sampling. Image-derived input functions (IDIFs) of the ascending aorta (AA), aortic arch, descending aorta (DA), or left ventricle (LV) offer non-invasive alternatives, especially with long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems enabling whole-body dynamic 1⁸F-FDG imaging. This study aimed to validate uncorrected IDIFs derived from the AA, DA, aortic arch, and LV by comparing them to (late) venous whole-blood in patients undergoing LAFOV PET/CT.MethodsEleven oncology patients who underwent 70-min dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT scans on a LAFOV PET/CT system after receiving an intravenous bolus injection of 3.0 MBq/kg were included. Seven venous blood samples were collected manually at approximately 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 45, and 60 min post-injection (pi) and compared to IDIFs derived from the AA, aortic arch, DA, and LV. Bias between IDIFs and venous blood samples was assessed at each time point.ResultsIDIF accuracy relative to venous blood samples improved over time, with a median percentage bias <10% after 25 min pi. At 60 min pi, the aortic arch showed the smallest bias (median −1.1%, IQR 5.9%), followed by the AA (2.5%, IQR 7.0%), DA (5.1%, IQR 8.6%), and LV (7.4%, IQR 7.6%).ConclusionThe high precision of aorta-derived IDIFs suggests that IDIFs are a reliable alternative to manual blood sampling for dynamic 18F-FDG PET imaging on a LAFOV PET/CT system. Using IDIFs reduces variability, simplifies protocols, minimizes radiation exposure, and enhances patient safety with a non-invasive approach.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnume.2025.1556848/fullIDIFLAFOV PET18F-FDGdynamic PET imagingnon-invasive quantification
spellingShingle Charlotte L. C. Smith
Charlotte L. C. Smith
Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
Marijke E. den Hollander
Henricus N. J. M. Greuter
Henricus N. J. M. Greuter
Nienke R. Gerards
Nienke R. Gerards
Josée Zijlstra
Josée Zijlstra
C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Idris Bahce
Idris Bahce
Maqsood Yaqub
Maqsood Yaqub
Ronald Boellaard
Ronald Boellaard
Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies
Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
IDIF
LAFOV PET
18F-FDG
dynamic PET imaging
non-invasive quantification
title Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies
title_full Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies
title_fullStr Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies
title_full_unstemmed Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies
title_short Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies
title_sort validating image derived input functions of dynamic 18f fdg long axial field of view pet ct studies
topic IDIF
LAFOV PET
18F-FDG
dynamic PET imaging
non-invasive quantification
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnume.2025.1556848/full
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottelcsmith validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT charlottelcsmith validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT gerbenjczwezerijnen validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT gerbenjczwezerijnen validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT marijkeedenhollander validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT henricusnjmgreuter validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT henricusnjmgreuter validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT nienkergerards validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT nienkergerards validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT joseezijlstra validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT joseezijlstra validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT cwillemienmenkevanderhouvenvanoordt validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT cwillemienmenkevanderhouvenvanoordt validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT idrisbahce validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT idrisbahce validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT maqsoodyaqub validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT maqsoodyaqub validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT ronaldboellaard validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies
AT ronaldboellaard validatingimagederivedinputfunctionsofdynamic18ffdglongaxialfieldofviewpetctstudies