Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysis

BackgroundOtologic adverse events (AEs) have been occasionally reported as sequalae of COVID-19 vaccination, although their incidence in comparison with that of preexisting vaccines with high uptake remains unclear. This study compared the rates of new-onset otologic AEs among matched adults receivi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tina Munjal, Shelley Batts, Saurabh Gombar, Konstantina M. Stankovic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1637870/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849392448897286144
author Tina Munjal
Tina Munjal
Shelley Batts
Saurabh Gombar
Saurabh Gombar
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Konstantina M. Stankovic
author_facet Tina Munjal
Tina Munjal
Shelley Batts
Saurabh Gombar
Saurabh Gombar
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Konstantina M. Stankovic
author_sort Tina Munjal
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundOtologic adverse events (AEs) have been occasionally reported as sequalae of COVID-19 vaccination, although their incidence in comparison with that of preexisting vaccines with high uptake remains unclear. This study compared the rates of new-onset otologic AEs among matched adults receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccination versus influenza vaccination.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used electronic health records (EHR) data from Stanford Health Care to identify adults aged 50–89 years with no history of otologic disorders prior to first Pfizer/Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (December 2020–January 2022) or any pre-pandemic influenza vaccine (January 2016–December 2019). Patients were categorized by vaccination into FluVax or COVIDVax cohorts. A 90-day history pre-vaccination (baseline period) and ≥6 months follow-up post-vaccination were required. Event rates of new-onset hearing loss (HL), sudden HL, tinnitus, vertigo/dizziness, aural fullness, and otalgia in the 6 months post-vaccination were compared between groups after high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) matching. A sensitivity analysis was conducted among patients with no COVID-19 infection at any time. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression for the hdPS matched cohorts.ResultsAfter hdPS matching, 20,325 patients were included into the FluVax and COVIDVax cohorts, respectively (mean age: 65.5 and 65.2 years; 53.1 and 53.8% females). The rates of otologic AEs in the 6 months post-vaccination were similarly low for the FluVax and COVIDVax cohorts: 1.16% vs. 1.16% for any HL, 0.01% vs. 0.02% for sudden HL, 0.41% vs. 0.47% for tinnitus, 1.96% vs. 1.59% for vertigo, 0.27% vs. 0.25% for otalgia, and 0.09% vs. 0.2% for aural fullness. COVIDVax patients had lower odds of vertigo [OR 95% CI: 0.81 (0.70, 0.94)] and higher odds of aural fullness [2.16 (1.25–3.72)] than the FluVax patients (both p < 0.05). The results of the sensitivity analysis limited to patients with no COVID-19 infection at any time (N = 17,530 each cohort) were consistent with the primary results, but aural fullness was the only AE with statistically higher risk in the COVIDVax vs. FluVax cohort [OR (95% CI): 1.90 (1.09–3.31); p = 0.021].ConclusionNew-onset otologic AEs were rare among a large cohort of hdPS-matched patients who received mRNA COVID-19 or pre-pandemic flu vaccination at a single institution. Although aural fullness was statistically more common in the COVIDVax vs. FluVax cohort, regardless of COVID-19 infection status, it remained extremely rare (<0.22%) in any cohort. These results indicate a similar otologic safety profile of the two vaccines, although future research is recommended in larger EHR databases to corroborate the findings.
format Article
id doaj-art-37e3f42e990a47e3ac0d449e915690de
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-2295
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj-art-37e3f42e990a47e3ac0d449e915690de2025-08-20T03:40:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952025-08-011610.3389/fneur.2025.16378701637870Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysisTina Munjal0Tina Munjal1Shelley Batts2Saurabh Gombar3Saurabh Gombar4Konstantina M. Stankovic5Konstantina M. Stankovic6Konstantina M. Stankovic7Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesAtropos Health, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United StatesBackgroundOtologic adverse events (AEs) have been occasionally reported as sequalae of COVID-19 vaccination, although their incidence in comparison with that of preexisting vaccines with high uptake remains unclear. This study compared the rates of new-onset otologic AEs among matched adults receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccination versus influenza vaccination.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used electronic health records (EHR) data from Stanford Health Care to identify adults aged 50–89 years with no history of otologic disorders prior to first Pfizer/Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (December 2020–January 2022) or any pre-pandemic influenza vaccine (January 2016–December 2019). Patients were categorized by vaccination into FluVax or COVIDVax cohorts. A 90-day history pre-vaccination (baseline period) and ≥6 months follow-up post-vaccination were required. Event rates of new-onset hearing loss (HL), sudden HL, tinnitus, vertigo/dizziness, aural fullness, and otalgia in the 6 months post-vaccination were compared between groups after high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) matching. A sensitivity analysis was conducted among patients with no COVID-19 infection at any time. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression for the hdPS matched cohorts.ResultsAfter hdPS matching, 20,325 patients were included into the FluVax and COVIDVax cohorts, respectively (mean age: 65.5 and 65.2 years; 53.1 and 53.8% females). The rates of otologic AEs in the 6 months post-vaccination were similarly low for the FluVax and COVIDVax cohorts: 1.16% vs. 1.16% for any HL, 0.01% vs. 0.02% for sudden HL, 0.41% vs. 0.47% for tinnitus, 1.96% vs. 1.59% for vertigo, 0.27% vs. 0.25% for otalgia, and 0.09% vs. 0.2% for aural fullness. COVIDVax patients had lower odds of vertigo [OR 95% CI: 0.81 (0.70, 0.94)] and higher odds of aural fullness [2.16 (1.25–3.72)] than the FluVax patients (both p < 0.05). The results of the sensitivity analysis limited to patients with no COVID-19 infection at any time (N = 17,530 each cohort) were consistent with the primary results, but aural fullness was the only AE with statistically higher risk in the COVIDVax vs. FluVax cohort [OR (95% CI): 1.90 (1.09–3.31); p = 0.021].ConclusionNew-onset otologic AEs were rare among a large cohort of hdPS-matched patients who received mRNA COVID-19 or pre-pandemic flu vaccination at a single institution. Although aural fullness was statistically more common in the COVIDVax vs. FluVax cohort, regardless of COVID-19 infection status, it remained extremely rare (<0.22%) in any cohort. These results indicate a similar otologic safety profile of the two vaccines, although future research is recommended in larger EHR databases to corroborate the findings.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1637870/fullCOVID-19vaccinationinfluenzahearing losstinnitusvertigo
spellingShingle Tina Munjal
Tina Munjal
Shelley Batts
Saurabh Gombar
Saurabh Gombar
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Konstantina M. Stankovic
Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysis
Frontiers in Neurology
COVID-19
vaccination
influenza
hearing loss
tinnitus
vertigo
title Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysis
title_full Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysis
title_short Comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 versus influenza vaccination: a matched cohort analysis
title_sort comparison of the rates of emergent otologic adverse events following mrna covid 19 versus influenza vaccination a matched cohort analysis
topic COVID-19
vaccination
influenza
hearing loss
tinnitus
vertigo
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1637870/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tinamunjal comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis
AT tinamunjal comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis
AT shelleybatts comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis
AT saurabhgombar comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis
AT saurabhgombar comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis
AT konstantinamstankovic comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis
AT konstantinamstankovic comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis
AT konstantinamstankovic comparisonoftheratesofemergentotologicadverseeventsfollowingmrnacovid19versusinfluenzavaccinationamatchedcohortanalysis