The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates
Objective. This study aims to investigate the effects of reporting colonoscopy findings and the regular review of outcomes on adenoma detection rates. Methods. Patients who underwent colonoscopy from August 2013 to February 2014 were selected as the intervention group. The preintervention group incl...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Gastroenterology Research and Practice |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2548109 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832548318932107264 |
|---|---|
| author | Bin Deng Jiehua Zhi Yaosheng Chen Lanyu Liang Jian Wu Xuefen Gao Weiming Xiao Yanbing Ding |
| author_facet | Bin Deng Jiehua Zhi Yaosheng Chen Lanyu Liang Jian Wu Xuefen Gao Weiming Xiao Yanbing Ding |
| author_sort | Bin Deng |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective. This study aims to investigate the effects of reporting colonoscopy findings and the regular review of outcomes on adenoma detection rates. Methods. Patients who underwent colonoscopy from August 2013 to February 2014 were selected as the intervention group. The preintervention group included patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2013 to July 2013, in which the procedure sheet for this group of patients was not accomplished. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), and secondary outcomes included the success rate of intubation and withdrawal time. Results. This study included 2,467 cases: 1,302 cases in the intervention group and 1,165 cases in the preintervention group. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. In the intervention group, withdrawal time of colonoscopy was longer (P<0.01), and the success rate of intubation (92.5% versus 89.1%, P<0.05) and detection rate of polyps (32.6% versus 27.6%, P<0.05) and adenomas (20.0% versus 16.1%, P<0.05) were higher. Significantly high detection rates for proximal adenomas, flat adenomas, and adenomas with a diameter <5 mm were observed in the intervention group (all P<0.01). Conclusion. The reporting and review of procedure details help to improve quality indicators of colonoscopy. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-37dfad180c0349b88615054bbf0347e2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-6121 1687-630X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Gastroenterology Research and Practice |
| spelling | doaj-art-37dfad180c0349b88615054bbf0347e22025-02-03T06:14:15ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/25481092548109The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection RatesBin Deng0Jiehua Zhi1Yaosheng Chen2Lanyu Liang3Jian Wu4Xuefen Gao5Weiming Xiao6Yanbing Ding7Department of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaDepartment of Emergency, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, ChinaObjective. This study aims to investigate the effects of reporting colonoscopy findings and the regular review of outcomes on adenoma detection rates. Methods. Patients who underwent colonoscopy from August 2013 to February 2014 were selected as the intervention group. The preintervention group included patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2013 to July 2013, in which the procedure sheet for this group of patients was not accomplished. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), and secondary outcomes included the success rate of intubation and withdrawal time. Results. This study included 2,467 cases: 1,302 cases in the intervention group and 1,165 cases in the preintervention group. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. In the intervention group, withdrawal time of colonoscopy was longer (P<0.01), and the success rate of intubation (92.5% versus 89.1%, P<0.05) and detection rate of polyps (32.6% versus 27.6%, P<0.05) and adenomas (20.0% versus 16.1%, P<0.05) were higher. Significantly high detection rates for proximal adenomas, flat adenomas, and adenomas with a diameter <5 mm were observed in the intervention group (all P<0.01). Conclusion. The reporting and review of procedure details help to improve quality indicators of colonoscopy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2548109 |
| spellingShingle | Bin Deng Jiehua Zhi Yaosheng Chen Lanyu Liang Jian Wu Xuefen Gao Weiming Xiao Yanbing Ding The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates Gastroenterology Research and Practice |
| title | The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates |
| title_full | The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates |
| title_fullStr | The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates |
| title_short | The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates |
| title_sort | impact of colonoscopy quality control table on adenoma detection rates |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2548109 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bindeng theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT jiehuazhi theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT yaoshengchen theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT lanyuliang theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT jianwu theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT xuefengao theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT weimingxiao theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT yanbingding theimpactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT bindeng impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT jiehuazhi impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT yaoshengchen impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT lanyuliang impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT jianwu impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT xuefengao impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT weimingxiao impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates AT yanbingding impactofcolonoscopyqualitycontroltableonadenomadetectionrates |