On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action

ABSTRACT Invasive forest pests can spread across large landscapes that include numerous land‐use management jurisdictions. As such, forest pest invasions need to be addressed with collaborative efforts because a single entity is seldom able to respond to the full scope of the problem. A collaborativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shannon Colleen Lynch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Plant-Environment Interactions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.70029
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850174546602098688
author Shannon Colleen Lynch
author_facet Shannon Colleen Lynch
author_sort Shannon Colleen Lynch
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Invasive forest pests can spread across large landscapes that include numerous land‐use management jurisdictions. As such, forest pest invasions need to be addressed with collaborative efforts because a single entity is seldom able to respond to the full scope of the problem. A collaborative governance framework provides a collective decision‐making process that allows diverse sets of actors who share an interest in a policy or management issue to work together towards mutually beneficial outcomes. Here, I apply a theoretical model of collaborative governance to understand the conditions in cooperative decision‐making that led to a consensus on statewide priorities to control an important invasive pest in California, the Fusarium dieback invasive shothole borers (FD–ISHB) beetle‐pathogen invasion. This provides (1) an empirical case study of collaborative governance in action throughout the stakeholder consensus building process and (2) interrogates that case study for theoretical contributions to the literature on collaborative governance, with special focus on invasive species management. Cohesive process outcomes were born out of effective principled engagement, participants' deep understanding and dedication to the system context, and the salient forces of leadership and interdependence baked in throughout the project. Ultimately, participants devoted their time and energy to a short but intensive planning process, resulting in more capacity for joint action, trust, interdependence, and a robust action plan that was quickly implemented.
format Article
id doaj-art-37dc3583577340899bdbe9b8a4bbe31e
institution OA Journals
issn 2575-6265
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Plant-Environment Interactions
spelling doaj-art-37dc3583577340899bdbe9b8a4bbe31e2025-08-20T02:19:38ZengWileyPlant-Environment Interactions2575-62652025-04-0162n/an/a10.1002/pei3.70029On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective ActionShannon Colleen Lynch0Department of Plant Pathology University of California Davis Davis California USAABSTRACT Invasive forest pests can spread across large landscapes that include numerous land‐use management jurisdictions. As such, forest pest invasions need to be addressed with collaborative efforts because a single entity is seldom able to respond to the full scope of the problem. A collaborative governance framework provides a collective decision‐making process that allows diverse sets of actors who share an interest in a policy or management issue to work together towards mutually beneficial outcomes. Here, I apply a theoretical model of collaborative governance to understand the conditions in cooperative decision‐making that led to a consensus on statewide priorities to control an important invasive pest in California, the Fusarium dieback invasive shothole borers (FD–ISHB) beetle‐pathogen invasion. This provides (1) an empirical case study of collaborative governance in action throughout the stakeholder consensus building process and (2) interrogates that case study for theoretical contributions to the literature on collaborative governance, with special focus on invasive species management. Cohesive process outcomes were born out of effective principled engagement, participants' deep understanding and dedication to the system context, and the salient forces of leadership and interdependence baked in throughout the project. Ultimately, participants devoted their time and energy to a short but intensive planning process, resulting in more capacity for joint action, trust, interdependence, and a robust action plan that was quickly implemented.https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.70029biological invasionscollaborative governanceconsensus‐basedEuwallaceaeFusarium diebackinvasive forest pests
spellingShingle Shannon Colleen Lynch
On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action
Plant-Environment Interactions
biological invasions
collaborative governance
consensus‐based
Euwallaceae
Fusarium dieback
invasive forest pests
title On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action
title_full On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action
title_fullStr On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action
title_full_unstemmed On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action
title_short On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action
title_sort on collaborative governance building consensus on priorities to manage invasive species through collective action
topic biological invasions
collaborative governance
consensus‐based
Euwallaceae
Fusarium dieback
invasive forest pests
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.70029
work_keys_str_mv AT shannoncolleenlynch oncollaborativegovernancebuildingconsensusonprioritiestomanageinvasivespeciesthroughcollectiveaction