EFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPI

Abstract: The increasing number of wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hunters in Mississippi necessitates an understanding of the effect of hunter effort on harvest and hunter success rates relative to turkey population size. Hunter effort and success were studied for 6 spring gobblers‐only hunting s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William E. Palmer, George A. Hurst, John R. Lint
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1990-01-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.1990.tb00201.x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850225285974196224
author William E. Palmer
George A. Hurst
John R. Lint
author_facet William E. Palmer
George A. Hurst
John R. Lint
author_sort William E. Palmer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: The increasing number of wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hunters in Mississippi necessitates an understanding of the effect of hunter effort on harvest and hunter success rates relative to turkey population size. Hunter effort and success were studied for 6 spring gobblers‐only hunting seasons on a public hunting area in Mississippi. An average of 32 gobblers was harvested and hunter effort averaged 502 hunter‐days per year. Hunter success rate averaged 6.5%. An average of 25.8% of the pre‐hunting season gobbler population was harvested. Hunter success rates were correlated with gobbler call counts (P = 0.03), but, only weakly correlated with population estimates (r = 0.57). Daily harvest and hunter effort were positively correlated (P = 0.000). Hunter success rates were inversely correlated with hunter effort (P = 0.03). There were more hunters on weekends (P = 0.000), and hunters on weekends had lower success rates (P = 0.007). Although 1 in 6 unique hunters harvested a turkey, fewer than 20% of hunters returned after their first year. Hunter effort did not decline in seasons with low gobbler populations or in years with low gobbling activity. The low return rate of hunters to Tallahala Wildlife Management Area and the inverse relationship between daily hunter effort and success per hunter may indicate that hunter density was too high for a quality hunting experience. Hunter density could be limited to increase hunter satisfaction.
format Article
id doaj-art-379c564b51994ceea6730c217ea3e128
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 1990-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-379c564b51994ceea6730c217ea3e1282025-08-20T02:05:24ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55401990-01-011990S120821310.1002/j.2328-5540.1990.tb00201.xEFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPIWilliam E. Palmer0George A. Hurst1John R. Lint2Department of Wildlife and FisheriesMississippi State UniversityMississippi State, MS39762Department of Wildlife and FisheriesMississippi State UniversityMississippi State, MS39762Department of Wildlife and FisheriesMississippi State UniversityMississippi State, MS39762Abstract: The increasing number of wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hunters in Mississippi necessitates an understanding of the effect of hunter effort on harvest and hunter success rates relative to turkey population size. Hunter effort and success were studied for 6 spring gobblers‐only hunting seasons on a public hunting area in Mississippi. An average of 32 gobblers was harvested and hunter effort averaged 502 hunter‐days per year. Hunter success rate averaged 6.5%. An average of 25.8% of the pre‐hunting season gobbler population was harvested. Hunter success rates were correlated with gobbler call counts (P = 0.03), but, only weakly correlated with population estimates (r = 0.57). Daily harvest and hunter effort were positively correlated (P = 0.000). Hunter success rates were inversely correlated with hunter effort (P = 0.03). There were more hunters on weekends (P = 0.000), and hunters on weekends had lower success rates (P = 0.007). Although 1 in 6 unique hunters harvested a turkey, fewer than 20% of hunters returned after their first year. Hunter effort did not decline in seasons with low gobbler populations or in years with low gobbling activity. The low return rate of hunters to Tallahala Wildlife Management Area and the inverse relationship between daily hunter effort and success per hunter may indicate that hunter density was too high for a quality hunting experience. Hunter density could be limited to increase hunter satisfaction.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.1990.tb00201.x
spellingShingle William E. Palmer
George A. Hurst
John R. Lint
EFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPI
Wildlife Society Bulletin
title EFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPI
title_full EFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPI
title_fullStr EFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPI
title_full_unstemmed EFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPI
title_short EFFORT, SUCCESS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SPRING TURKEY HUNTERS ON TALLAHALA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, MISSISSIPPI
title_sort effort success and characteristics of spring turkey hunters on tallahala wildlife management area mississippi
url https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.1990.tb00201.x
work_keys_str_mv AT williamepalmer effortsuccessandcharacteristicsofspringturkeyhuntersontallahalawildlifemanagementareamississippi
AT georgeahurst effortsuccessandcharacteristicsofspringturkeyhuntersontallahalawildlifemanagementareamississippi
AT johnrlint effortsuccessandcharacteristicsofspringturkeyhuntersontallahalawildlifemanagementareamississippi