Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite

Abstract We assessed the effects of using a broadcast caller during surveys and increasing survey duration to estimate northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) density and occupancy. From 15 May 2009 to 15 August 2009, we conducted repeat‐visit breeding bobwhite surveys at 180 sites in Delaware, USA....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth R. Duren, Jeffrey J. Buler, William L. Jones, Christopher K. Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-03-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.82
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850256915066519552
author Kenneth R. Duren
Jeffrey J. Buler
William L. Jones
Christopher K. Williams
author_facet Kenneth R. Duren
Jeffrey J. Buler
William L. Jones
Christopher K. Williams
author_sort Kenneth R. Duren
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We assessed the effects of using a broadcast caller during surveys and increasing survey duration to estimate northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) density and occupancy. From 15 May 2009 to 15 August 2009, we conducted repeat‐visit breeding bobwhite surveys at 180 sites in Delaware, USA. Increasing survey duration from 3 min to 7 min, or using a broadcast caller, improved detection probability for a single visit by 52% and 42%, respectively. However, density estimates when using a broadcast caller were biased high—≥3 times greater compared to passive‐listening surveys. Density estimates for 3‐min and 7‐min passive surveys were not different. Additionally, bobwhite occupancy was similar among all 3 survey treatments. Use of a broadcast caller to survey for bobwhites appears to violate the assumption of distance sampling that an individual is detected prior to movement. Use of a broadcast caller is inappropriate for determining density estimates through distance sampling, but may be appropriate for determining site occupancy. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-37783fd4e593426aaa91d896ba9bbebf
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2012-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-37783fd4e593426aaa91d896ba9bbebf2025-08-20T01:56:32ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402012-03-01361162010.1002/wsb.82Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhiteKenneth R. Duren0Jeffrey J. Buler1William L. Jones2Christopher K. Williams3Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USADepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USADelaware Division of Fish and Wildlife, 89 Kings Highway, Dover, DE 19977, USADepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USAAbstract We assessed the effects of using a broadcast caller during surveys and increasing survey duration to estimate northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) density and occupancy. From 15 May 2009 to 15 August 2009, we conducted repeat‐visit breeding bobwhite surveys at 180 sites in Delaware, USA. Increasing survey duration from 3 min to 7 min, or using a broadcast caller, improved detection probability for a single visit by 52% and 42%, respectively. However, density estimates when using a broadcast caller were biased high—≥3 times greater compared to passive‐listening surveys. Density estimates for 3‐min and 7‐min passive surveys were not different. Additionally, bobwhite occupancy was similar among all 3 survey treatments. Use of a broadcast caller to survey for bobwhites appears to violate the assumption of distance sampling that an individual is detected prior to movement. Use of a broadcast caller is inappropriate for determining density estimates through distance sampling, but may be appropriate for determining site occupancy. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.82call playbackColinus virginianusdistance samplingnorthern bobwhiteoccupancy
spellingShingle Kenneth R. Duren
Jeffrey J. Buler
William L. Jones
Christopher K. Williams
Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite
Wildlife Society Bulletin
call playback
Colinus virginianus
distance sampling
northern bobwhite
occupancy
title Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite
title_full Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite
title_fullStr Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite
title_full_unstemmed Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite
title_short Effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite
title_sort effects of broadcasting calls during surveys to estimate density and occupancy of northern bobwhite
topic call playback
Colinus virginianus
distance sampling
northern bobwhite
occupancy
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.82
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethrduren effectsofbroadcastingcallsduringsurveystoestimatedensityandoccupancyofnorthernbobwhite
AT jeffreyjbuler effectsofbroadcastingcallsduringsurveystoestimatedensityandoccupancyofnorthernbobwhite
AT williamljones effectsofbroadcastingcallsduringsurveystoestimatedensityandoccupancyofnorthernbobwhite
AT christopherkwilliams effectsofbroadcastingcallsduringsurveystoestimatedensityandoccupancyofnorthernbobwhite