‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communities
Abstract Background Co-production between researchers, service providers, and members of affected communities is an old concept renewed by current efforts to decolonise global health, reduce exploitative practices, and develop more sustainable, context-relevant interventions to address global health...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | BMC Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22657-9 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850148476190457856 |
|---|---|
| author | Anna Durrance-Bagale Hari Basnet Nanda Bahadur Singh Steven R. Belmain James W. Rudge Natasha Howard |
| author_facet | Anna Durrance-Bagale Hari Basnet Nanda Bahadur Singh Steven R. Belmain James W. Rudge Natasha Howard |
| author_sort | Anna Durrance-Bagale |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Co-production between researchers, service providers, and members of affected communities is an old concept renewed by current efforts to decolonise global health, reduce exploitative practices, and develop more sustainable, context-relevant interventions to address global health issues. Working with communities– how ever defined– is central to healthcare improvement but engaging with communities and identifying priorities remains challenging for disease control professionals. Co-production aims to help ensure community members have some control over the design and implementation of any intervention, and greater ownership of processes and outcomes. We aimed to identify what would encourage co-production of activities to prevent potential transmission of zoonoses. Methods In this qualitative study, we (British and Nepali researchers) interviewed 73 participants from six communities across Nepal, with 10 participating in photovoice. We also interviewed 20 healthcare professionals and policymakers, 14 representing human and six representing animal health. We interpreted data using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Thirty-nine people in six communities participated in interviews, with another 34 in 5 focus groups. We generated three overarching themes: (i) constrained healthcare-seeking behaviours, (ii) experience of community programmes, and (iii) community priorities and co-production. Community participants, despite strong opinions and desire to participate in disease control interventions, had experienced little or no attempt by intervention organisers to engage them in design, implementation, evaluation, or accountability. Most had no experience of programmes at all. Participants highlighted the significance of working in ‘local’ languages, respecting religious and cultural realities, relating initiatives to lived experience, and ensuring that local leaders are involved. Conclusions Meaningful co-production requires recognising communities– through legitimate leadership/representation– as expert and equal partners who can ‘work alongside’ at all stages of any initiative. Implications from this research include the importance of promoting trust in communities through inclusion of influential community members (community health volunteers, traditional medicine practitioners, women’s group leaders); the use of indigenous languages; the acceptability of different media for interventions (theatre, drama); and the need to be pragmatic about available resources, to manage the expectations of community members. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-373be8a86918414ea7bf37739810ee21 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1471-2458 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Public Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-373be8a86918414ea7bf37739810ee212025-08-20T02:27:15ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-04-0125111810.1186/s12889-025-22657-9‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communitiesAnna Durrance-Bagale0Hari Basnet1Nanda Bahadur Singh2Steven R. Belmain3James W. Rudge4Natasha Howard5London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health & DevelopmentNepalese Ornithological UnionCentral Department of Zoology, Tribhuvan UniversityNatural Resources Institute, University of GreenwichLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health & DevelopmentLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health & DevelopmentAbstract Background Co-production between researchers, service providers, and members of affected communities is an old concept renewed by current efforts to decolonise global health, reduce exploitative practices, and develop more sustainable, context-relevant interventions to address global health issues. Working with communities– how ever defined– is central to healthcare improvement but engaging with communities and identifying priorities remains challenging for disease control professionals. Co-production aims to help ensure community members have some control over the design and implementation of any intervention, and greater ownership of processes and outcomes. We aimed to identify what would encourage co-production of activities to prevent potential transmission of zoonoses. Methods In this qualitative study, we (British and Nepali researchers) interviewed 73 participants from six communities across Nepal, with 10 participating in photovoice. We also interviewed 20 healthcare professionals and policymakers, 14 representing human and six representing animal health. We interpreted data using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Thirty-nine people in six communities participated in interviews, with another 34 in 5 focus groups. We generated three overarching themes: (i) constrained healthcare-seeking behaviours, (ii) experience of community programmes, and (iii) community priorities and co-production. Community participants, despite strong opinions and desire to participate in disease control interventions, had experienced little or no attempt by intervention organisers to engage them in design, implementation, evaluation, or accountability. Most had no experience of programmes at all. Participants highlighted the significance of working in ‘local’ languages, respecting religious and cultural realities, relating initiatives to lived experience, and ensuring that local leaders are involved. Conclusions Meaningful co-production requires recognising communities– through legitimate leadership/representation– as expert and equal partners who can ‘work alongside’ at all stages of any initiative. Implications from this research include the importance of promoting trust in communities through inclusion of influential community members (community health volunteers, traditional medicine practitioners, women’s group leaders); the use of indigenous languages; the acceptability of different media for interventions (theatre, drama); and the need to be pragmatic about available resources, to manage the expectations of community members.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22657-9Co-productionCommunity engagementInfectious diseaseMitigationNepalOne health |
| spellingShingle | Anna Durrance-Bagale Hari Basnet Nanda Bahadur Singh Steven R. Belmain James W. Rudge Natasha Howard ‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communities BMC Public Health Co-production Community engagement Infectious disease Mitigation Nepal One health |
| title | ‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communities |
| title_full | ‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communities |
| title_fullStr | ‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communities |
| title_full_unstemmed | ‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communities |
| title_short | ‘Community people are the most powerful resources’: qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co-produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with(in) Nepali communities |
| title_sort | community people are the most powerful resources qualitative critical realist analysis and framework to support co produced responses to zoonotic disease threats with in nepali communities |
| topic | Co-production Community engagement Infectious disease Mitigation Nepal One health |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22657-9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annadurrancebagale communitypeoplearethemostpowerfulresourcesqualitativecriticalrealistanalysisandframeworktosupportcoproducedresponsestozoonoticdiseasethreatswithinnepalicommunities AT haribasnet communitypeoplearethemostpowerfulresourcesqualitativecriticalrealistanalysisandframeworktosupportcoproducedresponsestozoonoticdiseasethreatswithinnepalicommunities AT nandabahadursingh communitypeoplearethemostpowerfulresourcesqualitativecriticalrealistanalysisandframeworktosupportcoproducedresponsestozoonoticdiseasethreatswithinnepalicommunities AT stevenrbelmain communitypeoplearethemostpowerfulresourcesqualitativecriticalrealistanalysisandframeworktosupportcoproducedresponsestozoonoticdiseasethreatswithinnepalicommunities AT jameswrudge communitypeoplearethemostpowerfulresourcesqualitativecriticalrealistanalysisandframeworktosupportcoproducedresponsestozoonoticdiseasethreatswithinnepalicommunities AT natashahoward communitypeoplearethemostpowerfulresourcesqualitativecriticalrealistanalysisandframeworktosupportcoproducedresponsestozoonoticdiseasethreatswithinnepalicommunities |