Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements

Abstract The capability of cells to sense and respond to endogenous electrical fields plays a crucial role in processes like nerve regeneration, wound healing, and development. In vitro, many cell types respond to electrical fields by migrating along the corresponding electrical field vectors. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Karem Naggay, Saeed Khomeijani Farahani, Xu Gao, Andrew Holle, Ralf Kemkemer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87737-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862468901863424
author Benjamin Karem Naggay
Saeed Khomeijani Farahani
Xu Gao
Andrew Holle
Ralf Kemkemer
author_facet Benjamin Karem Naggay
Saeed Khomeijani Farahani
Xu Gao
Andrew Holle
Ralf Kemkemer
author_sort Benjamin Karem Naggay
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The capability of cells to sense and respond to endogenous electrical fields plays a crucial role in processes like nerve regeneration, wound healing, and development. In vitro, many cell types respond to electrical fields by migrating along the corresponding electrical field vectors. This process is known as galvano- or electrotaxis. Here we report on the combined impact of micro-confinements and direct current electrical fields (dcEFs) on the motility of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells using a self-developed, easy-to-use platform with microchannels ranging from 3  $$\upmu$$ μ m to 11  $$\upmu$$ μ m in width and 11  $$\upmu$$ μ m height. We found that MDA-MB-231 cells respond to exogenous electrical fields ranging from 100 mV mm $$^{-1}$$ - 1 to 1000 mV mm $$^{-1}$$ - 1 with altered cell motility depending on the confinement size. Our data show an overall inhibited galvanotaxis in confinements, while in contrast an enhancing effect in unconfined galvanotaxis is found. The application of direct current electrical fields to microchannels not only caused a reduction in migration speed but also decreased the number of permeating cells. By applying 1000 mV mm $$^{-1}$$ - 1 , single-cell permeation could be prevented in confinements of 5  $$\upmu$$ μ m and smaller.
format Article
id doaj-art-3704ada68db44e09a656985394daba4b
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-3704ada68db44e09a656985394daba4b2025-02-09T12:29:25ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-02-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-87737-7Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinementsBenjamin Karem Naggay0Saeed Khomeijani Farahani1Xu Gao2Andrew Holle3Ralf Kemkemer4Department of Life Sciences, Reutlingen UniversityCharité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin BerlinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of SingaporeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of SingaporeDepartment of Life Sciences, Reutlingen UniversityAbstract The capability of cells to sense and respond to endogenous electrical fields plays a crucial role in processes like nerve regeneration, wound healing, and development. In vitro, many cell types respond to electrical fields by migrating along the corresponding electrical field vectors. This process is known as galvano- or electrotaxis. Here we report on the combined impact of micro-confinements and direct current electrical fields (dcEFs) on the motility of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells using a self-developed, easy-to-use platform with microchannels ranging from 3  $$\upmu$$ μ m to 11  $$\upmu$$ μ m in width and 11  $$\upmu$$ μ m height. We found that MDA-MB-231 cells respond to exogenous electrical fields ranging from 100 mV mm $$^{-1}$$ - 1 to 1000 mV mm $$^{-1}$$ - 1 with altered cell motility depending on the confinement size. Our data show an overall inhibited galvanotaxis in confinements, while in contrast an enhancing effect in unconfined galvanotaxis is found. The application of direct current electrical fields to microchannels not only caused a reduction in migration speed but also decreased the number of permeating cells. By applying 1000 mV mm $$^{-1}$$ - 1 , single-cell permeation could be prevented in confinements of 5  $$\upmu$$ μ m and smaller.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87737-7
spellingShingle Benjamin Karem Naggay
Saeed Khomeijani Farahani
Xu Gao
Andrew Holle
Ralf Kemkemer
Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements
Scientific Reports
title Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements
title_full Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements
title_fullStr Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements
title_full_unstemmed Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements
title_short Direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements
title_sort direct current electrical fields inhibit cancer cell motility in microchannel confinements
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87737-7
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminkaremnaggay directcurrentelectricalfieldsinhibitcancercellmotilityinmicrochannelconfinements
AT saeedkhomeijanifarahani directcurrentelectricalfieldsinhibitcancercellmotilityinmicrochannelconfinements
AT xugao directcurrentelectricalfieldsinhibitcancercellmotilityinmicrochannelconfinements
AT andrewholle directcurrentelectricalfieldsinhibitcancercellmotilityinmicrochannelconfinements
AT ralfkemkemer directcurrentelectricalfieldsinhibitcancercellmotilityinmicrochannelconfinements