Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort study

Abstract Background At the outbreak of the pandemic in Australia, which directly followed unprecedented bushfires, the PATH Through Life Study had just commenced data collection of its 5th wave for the 40s age cohort. Continuation of fieldwork required dynamic transition from an in-person structured...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanya Layton, Ranmalee Eramudugolla, Craig Sinclair, Imogen Gad, Moyra E. Mortby, Kaarin J. Anstey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-06-01
Series:Archives of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01646-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850113277176053760
author Tanya Layton
Ranmalee Eramudugolla
Craig Sinclair
Imogen Gad
Moyra E. Mortby
Kaarin J. Anstey
author_facet Tanya Layton
Ranmalee Eramudugolla
Craig Sinclair
Imogen Gad
Moyra E. Mortby
Kaarin J. Anstey
author_sort Tanya Layton
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background At the outbreak of the pandemic in Australia, which directly followed unprecedented bushfires, the PATH Through Life Study had just commenced data collection of its 5th wave for the 40s age cohort. Continuation of fieldwork required dynamic transition from an in-person structured assessment protocol, to remote assessment methods with adaptation of established measures. We aim to describe the methods used to adapt the longitudinal study to these events, and the implications of data collection methodology for analysis. Reflections on these experiences are essential for transparent reporting of protocol change, and for informing future study design. Methods Evaluation of the data collection process for the fifth follow-up assessment of the PATH Through Life Study, a population-based cohort of Australians aged 58–64 years (n = 2530). Evaluation metrics include response rates for interviews done in-person and remotely, observations from data collection modifications, and participant feedback. Additional online survey items measuring the impact of exposure to bushfires and COVID-19 were developed and deployed as part of the study. Results Of 2147 contacted for follow-up, 1558 participants completed wave 5 (data collection commenced September 2019). By November 2019 (onset of the bushfires), 585 (37%) participants had completed face-to-face interviews and by March 2020, a further 1057 (68%) participants had completed their interviews at the onset of government restrictions relating to COVID-19. The shift to remote assessments resulted in 30% of assessments being completed by telephone. Challenges of the data protocol approach are discussed including the impact of multiple data collection pathways on analysis, and limitations of telephone interviews. Participant completion rates for the additional bushfire and COVID-19 surveys for the wave were 60% and 69% respectively; anecdotal participant feedback was positive regarding the inclusion of these measures. Conclusions Dynamic capture of exposure to unexpected events within the context of an established longitudinal study requires rapid design and protocol adaptations, and careful documentation of participation timing and pathways. Given the heightened public interest, participant response was encouraging, and the data captured not only enhances the value of the whole dataset, but is uniquely placed to address questions on population-level vulnerabilities and ongoing impacts of the exposures.
format Article
id doaj-art-36ecf0882d2141dbb2c7e39b832fc3a7
institution OA Journals
issn 2049-3258
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Archives of Public Health
spelling doaj-art-36ecf0882d2141dbb2c7e39b832fc3a72025-08-20T02:37:13ZengBMCArchives of Public Health2049-32582025-06-0183111010.1186/s13690-025-01646-9Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort studyTanya Layton0Ranmalee Eramudugolla1Craig Sinclair2Imogen Gad3Moyra E. Mortby4Kaarin J. Anstey5School of Psychology, University of New South WalesSchool of Psychology, University of New South WalesSchool of Psychology, University of New South WalesSchool of Psychology, University of New South WalesSchool of Psychology, University of New South WalesSchool of Psychology, University of New South WalesAbstract Background At the outbreak of the pandemic in Australia, which directly followed unprecedented bushfires, the PATH Through Life Study had just commenced data collection of its 5th wave for the 40s age cohort. Continuation of fieldwork required dynamic transition from an in-person structured assessment protocol, to remote assessment methods with adaptation of established measures. We aim to describe the methods used to adapt the longitudinal study to these events, and the implications of data collection methodology for analysis. Reflections on these experiences are essential for transparent reporting of protocol change, and for informing future study design. Methods Evaluation of the data collection process for the fifth follow-up assessment of the PATH Through Life Study, a population-based cohort of Australians aged 58–64 years (n = 2530). Evaluation metrics include response rates for interviews done in-person and remotely, observations from data collection modifications, and participant feedback. Additional online survey items measuring the impact of exposure to bushfires and COVID-19 were developed and deployed as part of the study. Results Of 2147 contacted for follow-up, 1558 participants completed wave 5 (data collection commenced September 2019). By November 2019 (onset of the bushfires), 585 (37%) participants had completed face-to-face interviews and by March 2020, a further 1057 (68%) participants had completed their interviews at the onset of government restrictions relating to COVID-19. The shift to remote assessments resulted in 30% of assessments being completed by telephone. Challenges of the data protocol approach are discussed including the impact of multiple data collection pathways on analysis, and limitations of telephone interviews. Participant completion rates for the additional bushfire and COVID-19 surveys for the wave were 60% and 69% respectively; anecdotal participant feedback was positive regarding the inclusion of these measures. Conclusions Dynamic capture of exposure to unexpected events within the context of an established longitudinal study requires rapid design and protocol adaptations, and careful documentation of participation timing and pathways. Given the heightened public interest, participant response was encouraging, and the data captured not only enhances the value of the whole dataset, but is uniquely placed to address questions on population-level vulnerabilities and ongoing impacts of the exposures.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01646-9Research methodsNatural disasterCOVID-19Remote assessmentLongitudinal follow-up
spellingShingle Tanya Layton
Ranmalee Eramudugolla
Craig Sinclair
Imogen Gad
Moyra E. Mortby
Kaarin J. Anstey
Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort study
Archives of Public Health
Research methods
Natural disaster
COVID-19
Remote assessment
Longitudinal follow-up
title Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort study
title_full Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort study
title_fullStr Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort study
title_short Adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events: COVID-19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the PATH cohort study
title_sort adapting epidemiological research through unexpected environmental events covid 19 and bushfires impacts on the administration of the path cohort study
topic Research methods
Natural disaster
COVID-19
Remote assessment
Longitudinal follow-up
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01646-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tanyalayton adaptingepidemiologicalresearchthroughunexpectedenvironmentaleventscovid19andbushfiresimpactsontheadministrationofthepathcohortstudy
AT ranmaleeeramudugolla adaptingepidemiologicalresearchthroughunexpectedenvironmentaleventscovid19andbushfiresimpactsontheadministrationofthepathcohortstudy
AT craigsinclair adaptingepidemiologicalresearchthroughunexpectedenvironmentaleventscovid19andbushfiresimpactsontheadministrationofthepathcohortstudy
AT imogengad adaptingepidemiologicalresearchthroughunexpectedenvironmentaleventscovid19andbushfiresimpactsontheadministrationofthepathcohortstudy
AT moyraemortby adaptingepidemiologicalresearchthroughunexpectedenvironmentaleventscovid19andbushfiresimpactsontheadministrationofthepathcohortstudy
AT kaarinjanstey adaptingepidemiologicalresearchthroughunexpectedenvironmentaleventscovid19andbushfiresimpactsontheadministrationofthepathcohortstudy