Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
In this paper we analyze the exclusion criteria of scientific expert evidence of low epistemic reliability from two different legal cultures: common law and civil law. We develop the relationship between both groups of criteria to argue that the Daubert criteria may be applicable in civil law when d...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/498 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849416632677433344 |
|---|---|
| author | Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez |
| author_facet | Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez |
| author_sort | Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper we analyze the exclusion criteria of scientific expert evidence of low epistemic reliability from two different legal cultures: common law and civil law. We develop the relationship between both groups of criteria to argue that the Daubert criteria may be applicable in civil law when dealing with clear cases. The freedom of proof, the right to evidence and due process are limitations that prevent a broad application of the exclusion of evidence in these cases. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3693a546ffde49708036164bd56ed2d7 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2525-510X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
| publisher | Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| spelling | doaj-art-3693a546ffde49708036164bd56ed2d72025-08-20T03:33:08ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2021-03-017110.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.498218Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal culturesJuan Sebastián Vera Sánchez0Universidad de ChileIn this paper we analyze the exclusion criteria of scientific expert evidence of low epistemic reliability from two different legal cultures: common law and civil law. We develop the relationship between both groups of criteria to argue that the Daubert criteria may be applicable in civil law when dealing with clear cases. The freedom of proof, the right to evidence and due process are limitations that prevent a broad application of the exclusion of evidence in these cases.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/498fallo daubertprueba pericialreglas de exclusión. |
| spellingShingle | Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal fallo daubert prueba pericial reglas de exclusión. |
| title | Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures |
| title_full | Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures |
| title_fullStr | Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures |
| title_full_unstemmed | Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures |
| title_short | Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures |
| title_sort | exclusion of the scientific expert evidence low epistemic quality in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition dialogue between two legal cultures |
| topic | fallo daubert prueba pericial reglas de exclusión. |
| url | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/498 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT juansebastianverasanchez exclusionofthescientificexpertevidencelowepistemicqualityintheadmissibilityincriminalproceedingsofcivillawtraditiondialoguebetweentwolegalcultures |