Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic Granuloma

Background. Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a tumor-like, non-neoplastic lesion of the soft tissue that commonly appears in the oral cavity. Various treatment modalities have been discussed, including surgical excision, cryosurgery, curettage, electrodessication, corticosteroid injection, sclerotherapy,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peeyush Shivhare, Naqoosh Haidry, Neha Sah, Ajay Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Ankur singh, Mohan Raju Penumatcha, Shalini Subramanyam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8269221
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555222442967040
author Peeyush Shivhare
Naqoosh Haidry
Neha Sah
Ajay Kumar
Abhishek Gupta
Ankur singh
Mohan Raju Penumatcha
Shalini Subramanyam
author_facet Peeyush Shivhare
Naqoosh Haidry
Neha Sah
Ajay Kumar
Abhishek Gupta
Ankur singh
Mohan Raju Penumatcha
Shalini Subramanyam
author_sort Peeyush Shivhare
collection DOAJ
description Background. Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a tumor-like, non-neoplastic lesion of the soft tissue that commonly appears in the oral cavity. Various treatment modalities have been discussed, including surgical excision, cryosurgery, curettage, electrodessication, corticosteroid injection, sclerotherapy, and lasers. This observational retrospective study compared effectiveness between diode lasers and sclerotherapy for PG treatment. Materials and Methods. From July 2016 to January 2021, data of oral PG cases treated with sclerotherapy and diode lasers were gathered. Patients were evaluated and categorized according to their gender, sex, site of lesions, size of lesions, number of sessions, details of side effects, details of the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) on third postoperative day, response of treatment to individual groups, time required for complete resolution, and details of recurrence. Inferential statistical analysis was performed. Results. We included 73 patients, of whom 43 and 30 received laser and sclerotherapy treatment, respectively. Compared with the sclerotherapy group, the laser group had less side effects including pain, edema, ulceration, ecchymosis, infections, and scarring. The difference in postoperative pain (VAS scale) between the groups was statistically significant (p-value 0.004). Complete remission was seen in the laser group, while 3 cases of the sclerotherapy group had no response (p-value −0.034). The laser group experienced greater recurrence than did the sclerotherapy group. Conclusions. Both sclerotherapy with laser and 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate are effective for treating oral PG. Sclerotherapy is more effective in preventing recurrence. In terms of side effects, diode lasers are superior to sclerotherapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-368e0c5771164b04a8c2753b31e174ae
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-368e0c5771164b04a8c2753b31e174ae2025-02-03T05:49:19ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362022-01-01202210.1155/2022/8269221Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic GranulomaPeeyush Shivhare0Naqoosh Haidry1Neha Sah2Ajay Kumar3Abhishek Gupta4Ankur singh5Mohan Raju Penumatcha6Shalini Subramanyam7Department of DentistryDepartment of DentistryDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryDepartment of Oral Medicine and RadiologyDepartment of Oral Medicine and RadiologyDepartment of Oral Medicine and RadiologyPrivate Dental ClinicPrivate Dental ClinicBackground. Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a tumor-like, non-neoplastic lesion of the soft tissue that commonly appears in the oral cavity. Various treatment modalities have been discussed, including surgical excision, cryosurgery, curettage, electrodessication, corticosteroid injection, sclerotherapy, and lasers. This observational retrospective study compared effectiveness between diode lasers and sclerotherapy for PG treatment. Materials and Methods. From July 2016 to January 2021, data of oral PG cases treated with sclerotherapy and diode lasers were gathered. Patients were evaluated and categorized according to their gender, sex, site of lesions, size of lesions, number of sessions, details of side effects, details of the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) on third postoperative day, response of treatment to individual groups, time required for complete resolution, and details of recurrence. Inferential statistical analysis was performed. Results. We included 73 patients, of whom 43 and 30 received laser and sclerotherapy treatment, respectively. Compared with the sclerotherapy group, the laser group had less side effects including pain, edema, ulceration, ecchymosis, infections, and scarring. The difference in postoperative pain (VAS scale) between the groups was statistically significant (p-value 0.004). Complete remission was seen in the laser group, while 3 cases of the sclerotherapy group had no response (p-value −0.034). The laser group experienced greater recurrence than did the sclerotherapy group. Conclusions. Both sclerotherapy with laser and 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate are effective for treating oral PG. Sclerotherapy is more effective in preventing recurrence. In terms of side effects, diode lasers are superior to sclerotherapy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8269221
spellingShingle Peeyush Shivhare
Naqoosh Haidry
Neha Sah
Ajay Kumar
Abhishek Gupta
Ankur singh
Mohan Raju Penumatcha
Shalini Subramanyam
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic Granuloma
International Journal of Dentistry
title Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic Granuloma
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic Granuloma
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic Granuloma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic Granuloma
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Oral Pyogenic Granuloma
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of the diode laser 980 nm and sclerotherapy for the treatment of oral pyogenic granuloma
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8269221
work_keys_str_mv AT peeyushshivhare comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma
AT naqooshhaidry comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma
AT nehasah comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma
AT ajaykumar comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma
AT abhishekgupta comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma
AT ankursingh comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma
AT mohanrajupenumatcha comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma
AT shalinisubramanyam comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofthediodelaser980nmandsclerotherapyforthetreatmentoforalpyogenicgranuloma