Words Matter: Peer Review as a Failing Safeguard
<p><span><em>Peer review is intended to support the quality and standards of academic work. The peer review process has been questioned recently in a number of different arenas. Source reliability and information credibility can be a problem when an academic sch...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Tom Quiggin |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Centre for Counter Terrorism
2013-04-01
|
| Series: | Perspectives on Terrorism |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/256 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Structured peer review: implementation and checklist development
by: Bahar Mehmani, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Peer review: A highly valuable service but less recognized
by: Asegid Getachew Woldeamanuel
Published: (2025-03-01) -
The Role of the Anonymous Voice in Post-Publication Peer Review Versus Traditional Peer Review
by: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Thank You to Our 2024 Peer Reviewers
by: Stephen M. Griffies, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Thank You to Our 2024 Peer Reviewers
by: Julia K. Parrish, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01)