An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions
Method comparison studies mainly focus on determining if the two methods of measuring a continuous variable are agreeable enough to be used interchangeably. Typically, a standard mixed-effects model uses to model the method comparison data that assume normality for both random effects and errors. Ho...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Probability and Statistics |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3453912 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849306268915728384 |
|---|---|
| author | Jeevana Duwarahan Lakshika S. Nawarathna |
| author_facet | Jeevana Duwarahan Lakshika S. Nawarathna |
| author_sort | Jeevana Duwarahan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Method comparison studies mainly focus on determining if the two methods of measuring a continuous variable are agreeable enough to be used interchangeably. Typically, a standard mixed-effects model uses to model the method comparison data that assume normality for both random effects and errors. However, these assumptions are frequently violated in practice due to the skewness and heavy tails. In particular, the biases of the methods may vary with the extent of measurement. Thus, we propose a methodology for method comparison data to deal with these issues in the context of the measurement error model (MEM) that assumes a skew-t (ST) distribution for the true covariates and centered Student’s t (cT) distribution for the errors with known error variances, named STcT-MEM. An expectation conditional maximization (ECM) algorithm is used to compute the maximum likelihood (ML) estimates. The simulation study is performed to validate the proposed methodology. This methodology is illustrated by analyzing gold particle data and then compared with the standard measurement error model (SMEM). The likelihood ratio (LR) test is used to identify the most appropriate model among the above models. In addition, the total deviation index (TDI) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used to check the agreement between the methods. The findings suggest that our proposed framework for analyzing unreplicated method comparison data with asymmetry and heavy tails works effectively for modest and large samples. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-36714c5790ef4704b8dcc4be1c57f2ca |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-9538 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Probability and Statistics |
| spelling | doaj-art-36714c5790ef4704b8dcc4be1c57f2ca2025-08-20T03:55:07ZengWileyJournal of Probability and Statistics1687-95382022-01-01202210.1155/2022/3453912An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed DistributionsJeevana Duwarahan0Lakshika S. Nawarathna1Postgraduate Institute of ScienceDepartment of Statistics and Computer ScienceMethod comparison studies mainly focus on determining if the two methods of measuring a continuous variable are agreeable enough to be used interchangeably. Typically, a standard mixed-effects model uses to model the method comparison data that assume normality for both random effects and errors. However, these assumptions are frequently violated in practice due to the skewness and heavy tails. In particular, the biases of the methods may vary with the extent of measurement. Thus, we propose a methodology for method comparison data to deal with these issues in the context of the measurement error model (MEM) that assumes a skew-t (ST) distribution for the true covariates and centered Student’s t (cT) distribution for the errors with known error variances, named STcT-MEM. An expectation conditional maximization (ECM) algorithm is used to compute the maximum likelihood (ML) estimates. The simulation study is performed to validate the proposed methodology. This methodology is illustrated by analyzing gold particle data and then compared with the standard measurement error model (SMEM). The likelihood ratio (LR) test is used to identify the most appropriate model among the above models. In addition, the total deviation index (TDI) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used to check the agreement between the methods. The findings suggest that our proposed framework for analyzing unreplicated method comparison data with asymmetry and heavy tails works effectively for modest and large samples.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3453912 |
| spellingShingle | Jeevana Duwarahan Lakshika S. Nawarathna An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions Journal of Probability and Statistics |
| title | An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions |
| title_full | An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions |
| title_fullStr | An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions |
| title_short | An Improved Measurement Error Model for Analyzing Unreplicated Method Comparison Data under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions |
| title_sort | improved measurement error model for analyzing unreplicated method comparison data under asymmetric heavy tailed distributions |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3453912 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jeevanaduwarahan animprovedmeasurementerrormodelforanalyzingunreplicatedmethodcomparisondataunderasymmetricheavytaileddistributions AT lakshikasnawarathna animprovedmeasurementerrormodelforanalyzingunreplicatedmethodcomparisondataunderasymmetricheavytaileddistributions AT jeevanaduwarahan improvedmeasurementerrormodelforanalyzingunreplicatedmethodcomparisondataunderasymmetricheavytaileddistributions AT lakshikasnawarathna improvedmeasurementerrormodelforanalyzingunreplicatedmethodcomparisondataunderasymmetricheavytaileddistributions |