Sur quelques théories de la représentation visuelle avant Kepler
This article attempts to understand the extent to which, and the terms in which, it was possible to speak of sensory vision as a psychic representation before Johannes Kepler inaugurated the new optics in his famous Paralipomena ad Vitellionem (1604). The following argument is taken as a starting po...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Astérion |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/7276 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This article attempts to understand the extent to which, and the terms in which, it was possible to speak of sensory vision as a psychic representation before Johannes Kepler inaugurated the new optics in his famous Paralipomena ad Vitellionem (1604). The following argument is taken as a starting point: That it is only within this new paradigm, dissociating the physical process of vision from its psychic treatment, one can legitimately speak of vision as a mental construction or a representation. After examining this question in the light of several ancient and medieval theories, the article reaches a different conclusion. The question of vision as a mental representation dates as far back as Aristotle, conferring to the internal senses (phantasia, common sense) the major function in elaborating the content of perception. Additionally, some theories under neo-Platonic influence, such as those of Augustine or Avicenna, clearly conceive direct vision as a psychic representation. In Paralipomena ad Vitellionem, Kepler distinguishes optics as a physical science of light from the psychology of perception; but the latter has already a long history, as does the idea of vision as a mental representation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1762-6110 |