The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based technique

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare post‐operative short‐term patient‐reported outcome measurements (PROMs) between robotic‐assisted (RA) and the conventional jig‐based technique using bi‐cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR TKA). Methods This retrospective single‐surgeo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takao Kaneko, Kosuke Shiga, Ayakane Yamamoto, Kazuki Amemiya, Masaru Omata, Shu Yoshizawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70288
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234228844167168
author Takao Kaneko
Kosuke Shiga
Ayakane Yamamoto
Kazuki Amemiya
Masaru Omata
Shu Yoshizawa
author_facet Takao Kaneko
Kosuke Shiga
Ayakane Yamamoto
Kazuki Amemiya
Masaru Omata
Shu Yoshizawa
author_sort Takao Kaneko
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare post‐operative short‐term patient‐reported outcome measurements (PROMs) between robotic‐assisted (RA) and the conventional jig‐based technique using bi‐cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR TKA). Methods This retrospective single‐surgeon consecutive cohort analysis compares 33 RA‐BCR TKA patients (Robot group) to 32 conventional TKA patients (Conventional group). Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral and tibial component rotational alignment, distal and posterior femoral osteotomy (mm) were compared between the two groups using three‐dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements. 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score and Patella score were collected more than 1 year after surgery. Results Pre‐operative knee scores were significantly higher in the Robot group (mean: 20.5) than in the Conventional group (mean: 16.8), while functional scores were significantly lower in the Robot group (mean: 57.7) than in the Conventional group (mean: 69.6). The Robot group showed significantly greater improvements in post‐operative extension angle (p < 0.01), and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 KSS (p < 0.01). LDFA, MPTA and rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components showed no significant difference between the two groups. Medial distal femoral osteotomy (mm) was significantly greater in the Conventional group (p < 0.01). Lateral posterior femoral osteotomy (mm) was significantly greater in the Robot group (p < 0.01). The robotic group had significantly more cases of joint line restoration and reduced lateral posterior condylar offset than the Conventional group. Conclusions RA‐BCR TKA improved post‐operative extension angle and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 KSS more than the Conventional TKA. Level of Evidence Level III.
format Article
id doaj-art-35fd01d7691a4ebcbb2b1ffad25d539d
institution Kabale University
issn 2197-1153
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
spelling doaj-art-35fd01d7691a4ebcbb2b1ffad25d539d2025-08-20T04:03:13ZengWileyJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532025-04-01122n/an/a10.1002/jeo2.70288The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based techniqueTakao Kaneko0Kosuke Shiga1Ayakane Yamamoto2Kazuki Amemiya3Masaru Omata4Shu Yoshizawa5Ichinomiya Onsen Hospital Adult Reconstruction Center Fuefuki‐city Yamanashi JapanIchinomiya Onsen Hospital Adult Reconstruction Center Fuefuki‐city Yamanashi JapanIchinomiya Onsen Hospital Adult Reconstruction Center Fuefuki‐city Yamanashi JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation Ichinomiya Onsen Hospital Fuefuki‐city Yamanashi JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation Ichinomiya Onsen Hospital Fuefuki‐city Yamanashi JapanIchinomiya Onsen Hospital Adult Reconstruction Center Fuefuki‐city Yamanashi JapanAbstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare post‐operative short‐term patient‐reported outcome measurements (PROMs) between robotic‐assisted (RA) and the conventional jig‐based technique using bi‐cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR TKA). Methods This retrospective single‐surgeon consecutive cohort analysis compares 33 RA‐BCR TKA patients (Robot group) to 32 conventional TKA patients (Conventional group). Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral and tibial component rotational alignment, distal and posterior femoral osteotomy (mm) were compared between the two groups using three‐dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements. 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score and Patella score were collected more than 1 year after surgery. Results Pre‐operative knee scores were significantly higher in the Robot group (mean: 20.5) than in the Conventional group (mean: 16.8), while functional scores were significantly lower in the Robot group (mean: 57.7) than in the Conventional group (mean: 69.6). The Robot group showed significantly greater improvements in post‐operative extension angle (p < 0.01), and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 KSS (p < 0.01). LDFA, MPTA and rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components showed no significant difference between the two groups. Medial distal femoral osteotomy (mm) was significantly greater in the Conventional group (p < 0.01). Lateral posterior femoral osteotomy (mm) was significantly greater in the Robot group (p < 0.01). The robotic group had significantly more cases of joint line restoration and reduced lateral posterior condylar offset than the Conventional group. Conclusions RA‐BCR TKA improved post‐operative extension angle and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 KSS more than the Conventional TKA. Level of Evidence Level III.https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70288bi‐cruciate retaining total knee arthroplastyconventional jig‐based knee arthroplastypatient‐reported outcome measurementsrobotic‐assisted total knee arthroplastythree‐dimensional computed tomography
spellingShingle Takao Kaneko
Kosuke Shiga
Ayakane Yamamoto
Kazuki Amemiya
Masaru Omata
Shu Yoshizawa
The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based technique
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
bi‐cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty
conventional jig‐based knee arthroplasty
patient‐reported outcome measurements
robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty
three‐dimensional computed tomography
title The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based technique
title_full The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based technique
title_fullStr The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based technique
title_full_unstemmed The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based technique
title_short The positive impact of robotic‐assisted BCR TKA on post‐operative joint line restoration, lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 Knee Society Score than the conventional jig‐based technique
title_sort positive impact of robotic assisted bcr tka on post operative joint line restoration lateral posterior condylar offset and standard and advanced activity in the 2011 knee society score than the conventional jig based technique
topic bi‐cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty
conventional jig‐based knee arthroplasty
patient‐reported outcome measurements
robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty
three‐dimensional computed tomography
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70288
work_keys_str_mv AT takaokaneko thepositiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT kosukeshiga thepositiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT ayakaneyamamoto thepositiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT kazukiamemiya thepositiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT masaruomata thepositiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT shuyoshizawa thepositiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT takaokaneko positiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT kosukeshiga positiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT ayakaneyamamoto positiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT kazukiamemiya positiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT masaruomata positiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique
AT shuyoshizawa positiveimpactofroboticassistedbcrtkaonpostoperativejointlinerestorationlateralposteriorcondylaroffsetandstandardandadvancedactivityinthe2011kneesocietyscorethantheconventionaljigbasedtechnique