Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
[This article has no abstract]
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Peer Community In
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Peer Community Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.310/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825206385130864640 |
|---|---|
| author | Nielsen, Birte L. Golledge, Huw D. R. Chou, Jen-Yun Camerlink, Irene Pongrácz, Péter Ceballos, Maria Camila Whittaker, Alexandra L. Olsson, I. Anna S. |
| author_facet | Nielsen, Birte L. Golledge, Huw D. R. Chou, Jen-Yun Camerlink, Irene Pongrácz, Péter Ceballos, Maria Camila Whittaker, Alexandra L. Olsson, I. Anna S. |
| author_sort | Nielsen, Birte L. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | [This article has no abstract]
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-35cff814a6cd46fcb9f41a99a7bd9b7f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2804-3871 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | Peer Community In |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Peer Community Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-35cff814a6cd46fcb9f41a99a7bd9b7f2025-02-07T10:16:49ZengPeer Community InPeer Community Journal2804-38712023-08-01310.24072/pcjournal.31010.24072/pcjournal.310Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution? Nielsen, Birte L.0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-6329Golledge, Huw D. R.1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2321-7929Chou, Jen-Yun2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-2528Camerlink, Irene3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3427-2210Pongrácz, Péter4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5126-299XCeballos, Maria Camila5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-2904Whittaker, Alexandra L.6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-8296Olsson, I. Anna S.7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4369-8723Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW), The Old School, Wheathampstead, United KingdomUniversities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW), The Old School, Wheathampstead, United KingdomPig Development Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Ireland; Institute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, PolandDepartment of Ethology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, HungaryFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, AustraliaI3S – Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal[This article has no abstract] https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.310/ethics review; animal welfare science; harm-benefit analysis; ethics review committees; ethics approval; national regulations; |
| spellingShingle | Nielsen, Birte L. Golledge, Huw D. R. Chou, Jen-Yun Camerlink, Irene Pongrácz, Péter Ceballos, Maria Camila Whittaker, Alexandra L. Olsson, I. Anna S. Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution? Peer Community Journal ethics review; animal welfare science; harm-benefit analysis; ethics review committees; ethics approval; national regulations; |
| title | Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
|
| title_full | Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
|
| title_fullStr | Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
|
| title_full_unstemmed | Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
|
| title_short | Ensuring ethical animal welfare research: Are more ethics review committees the solution?
|
| title_sort | ensuring ethical animal welfare research are more ethics review committees the solution |
| topic | ethics review; animal welfare science; harm-benefit analysis; ethics review committees; ethics approval; national regulations; |
| url | https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.310/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nielsenbirtel ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution AT golledgehuwdr ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution AT choujenyun ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution AT camerlinkirene ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution AT pongraczpeter ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution AT ceballosmariacamila ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution AT whittakeralexandral ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution AT olssoniannas ensuringethicalanimalwelfareresearcharemoreethicsreviewcommitteesthesolution |