Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology

Effectiveness of the patients with the vitreoretinal pathology with different quality of life (QL) comparative evaluation methods. Methods. 129 patients (before and after standard vitrectomy) with the 3 types of the vitreretinal pathology were examined (38 — with intraocular hemorrhage, 43 — prolife...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. G. Ovechkin, A. V. Malyshev, G. Yu. Karapetov, T. A. Avanesova, N. I. Ovechkin, V. E. Yudin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ophthalmology Publishing Group 2016-12-01
Series:Oftalʹmologiâ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/337
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849687585434107904
author I. G. Ovechkin
A. V. Malyshev
G. Yu. Karapetov
T. A. Avanesova
N. I. Ovechkin
V. E. Yudin
author_facet I. G. Ovechkin
A. V. Malyshev
G. Yu. Karapetov
T. A. Avanesova
N. I. Ovechkin
V. E. Yudin
author_sort I. G. Ovechkin
collection DOAJ
description Effectiveness of the patients with the vitreoretinal pathology with different quality of life (QL) comparative evaluation methods. Methods. 129 patients (before and after standard vitrectomy) with the 3 types of the vitreretinal pathology were examined (38 — with intraocular hemorrhage, 43 — proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), 48 — retinal detachment). Complex examination (36 clinical, haemodynamic and electrophysiological indications) were performed before and 1 month after surgery. QL research was based on the QL-25 (Russian type of the VFQ-25), QL-9 (Russian type of VF-14) and authorial QL-20 questionnaire. Results. QL increasing was detected after the surgery (15.8–20.9%) in all cases of the vitreoretinal pathology type. Correlation analysis of the different QL hasshown obvious QL-20 advantages, comparing to QL-9 and mostly QL-25, that was indicated by the statistically significant difference of the middle (all 36 indicators) KK (0,44±0,02; 0,35±0,02; 0,15±0,03) and higher KK relating to prognostic informative vision indicators (0,75–0,84; 0,69–0,74; 0,21–0,70). Conclusion. Results indicate actuality of the QL-20 method adaption in dispensary observation of the patients with different types of vitreoretinal pathology.
format Article
id doaj-art-35a62305e7b54aecbdcd59a08e084bd5
institution DOAJ
issn 1816-5095
2500-0845
language Russian
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Ophthalmology Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Oftalʹmologiâ
spelling doaj-art-35a62305e7b54aecbdcd59a08e084bd52025-08-20T03:22:18ZrusOphthalmology Publishing GroupOftalʹmologiâ1816-50952500-08452016-12-0113426527210.18008/1816-5095-2016-4-265-272312Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal PathologyI. G. Ovechkin0A. V. Malyshev1G. Yu. Karapetov2T. A. Avanesova3N. I. Ovechkin4V. E. Yudin5Federal institute of the professional development, Federal medical and biological agencyScientific-Research Institute - Regional Clinical Hospital № 1 named after Professor S.V.OchapovskуScientific-Research Institute - Regional Clinical Hospital № 1 named after Professor S.V.OchapovskуClinical Hospital №15 named OM Filatov.Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye DiseasesInstitute of Medical and Social TechnologiesEffectiveness of the patients with the vitreoretinal pathology with different quality of life (QL) comparative evaluation methods. Methods. 129 patients (before and after standard vitrectomy) with the 3 types of the vitreretinal pathology were examined (38 — with intraocular hemorrhage, 43 — proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), 48 — retinal detachment). Complex examination (36 clinical, haemodynamic and electrophysiological indications) were performed before and 1 month after surgery. QL research was based on the QL-25 (Russian type of the VFQ-25), QL-9 (Russian type of VF-14) and authorial QL-20 questionnaire. Results. QL increasing was detected after the surgery (15.8–20.9%) in all cases of the vitreoretinal pathology type. Correlation analysis of the different QL hasshown obvious QL-20 advantages, comparing to QL-9 and mostly QL-25, that was indicated by the statistically significant difference of the middle (all 36 indicators) KK (0,44±0,02; 0,35±0,02; 0,15±0,03) and higher KK relating to prognostic informative vision indicators (0,75–0,84; 0,69–0,74; 0,21–0,70). Conclusion. Results indicate actuality of the QL-20 method adaption in dispensary observation of the patients with different types of vitreoretinal pathology.https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/337quality of lifevitreoretinal pathologysubjective status
spellingShingle I. G. Ovechkin
A. V. Malyshev
G. Yu. Karapetov
T. A. Avanesova
N. I. Ovechkin
V. E. Yudin
Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology
Oftalʹmologiâ
quality of life
vitreoretinal pathology
subjective status
title Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology
title_sort comparative evaluation of the different assessment methods of life quality in patients with vitreoretinal pathology
topic quality of life
vitreoretinal pathology
subjective status
url https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/337
work_keys_str_mv AT igovechkin comparativeevaluationofthedifferentassessmentmethodsoflifequalityinpatientswithvitreoretinalpathology
AT avmalyshev comparativeevaluationofthedifferentassessmentmethodsoflifequalityinpatientswithvitreoretinalpathology
AT gyukarapetov comparativeevaluationofthedifferentassessmentmethodsoflifequalityinpatientswithvitreoretinalpathology
AT taavanesova comparativeevaluationofthedifferentassessmentmethodsoflifequalityinpatientswithvitreoretinalpathology
AT niovechkin comparativeevaluationofthedifferentassessmentmethodsoflifequalityinpatientswithvitreoretinalpathology
AT veyudin comparativeevaluationofthedifferentassessmentmethodsoflifequalityinpatientswithvitreoretinalpathology