Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds

ABSTRACT Humans have long provided nest boxes in a widespread and popular effort to augment nesting sites for cavity‐nesting birds. Nest boxes, however, may provide easy access for predators and thereby create ecological traps for nesting birds. Predator exclusion techniques are often deployed at ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robyn L. Bailey, David N. Bonter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-09-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.801
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064286684020736
author Robyn L. Bailey
David N. Bonter
author_facet Robyn L. Bailey
David N. Bonter
author_sort Robyn L. Bailey
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Humans have long provided nest boxes in a widespread and popular effort to augment nesting sites for cavity‐nesting birds. Nest boxes, however, may provide easy access for predators and thereby create ecological traps for nesting birds. Predator exclusion techniques are often deployed at nest boxes to reduce nest predation, but few studies have tested their performance. For the first time, we test the effectiveness of predator guards in promoting the nesting success of multiple species of birds at a large spatial scale (United States and Canada). We used nest fate data from 24,114 nest records submitted from 2014 to 2016 to NestWatch, a citizen‐science program focused on quantifying nesting success, to determine whether installing predator guards on nest boxes is an effective management technique. Across all species, top models predicting daily nest survival rates suggest a positive influence of predator guards, with a nearly 7% increase in nest success for attempts in boxes with guards versus attempts in boxes without guards. At the species level, nest survival was greater for individuals nesting in boxes with guards in 7 of 9 species, with no effect in the remaining 2 species. Although all types of guards were correlated with improved nesting success, birds nesting in boxes with cone‐type baffles, stovepipe baffles, or entrance hole extenders were most likely to result in successful nesting. Further, birds nesting in boxes with multiple predator guards were more successful, on average, than birds nesting in boxes with only a single guard. Our results can help managers of cavity‐nesting birds incorporate science‐based evidence into decision‐making and allocate resources more effectively. © 2017 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-358844fbbcd048a0b951bfe23e1fa9a3
institution DOAJ
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-358844fbbcd048a0b951bfe23e1fa9a32025-08-20T02:49:20ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402017-09-0141343444110.1002/wsb.801Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birdsRobyn L. Bailey0David N. Bonter1Cornell Lab of Ornithology159 Sapsucker Woods RoadIthacaNY14850USACornell Lab of Ornithology159 Sapsucker Woods RoadIthacaNY14850USAABSTRACT Humans have long provided nest boxes in a widespread and popular effort to augment nesting sites for cavity‐nesting birds. Nest boxes, however, may provide easy access for predators and thereby create ecological traps for nesting birds. Predator exclusion techniques are often deployed at nest boxes to reduce nest predation, but few studies have tested their performance. For the first time, we test the effectiveness of predator guards in promoting the nesting success of multiple species of birds at a large spatial scale (United States and Canada). We used nest fate data from 24,114 nest records submitted from 2014 to 2016 to NestWatch, a citizen‐science program focused on quantifying nesting success, to determine whether installing predator guards on nest boxes is an effective management technique. Across all species, top models predicting daily nest survival rates suggest a positive influence of predator guards, with a nearly 7% increase in nest success for attempts in boxes with guards versus attempts in boxes without guards. At the species level, nest survival was greater for individuals nesting in boxes with guards in 7 of 9 species, with no effect in the remaining 2 species. Although all types of guards were correlated with improved nesting success, birds nesting in boxes with cone‐type baffles, stovepipe baffles, or entrance hole extenders were most likely to result in successful nesting. Further, birds nesting in boxes with multiple predator guards were more successful, on average, than birds nesting in boxes with only a single guard. Our results can help managers of cavity‐nesting birds incorporate science‐based evidence into decision‐making and allocate resources more effectively. © 2017 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.801cavity‐nesting birdscitizen sciencenest boxnesting successNestWatchpredator guard
spellingShingle Robyn L. Bailey
David N. Bonter
Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds
Wildlife Society Bulletin
cavity‐nesting birds
citizen science
nest box
nesting success
NestWatch
predator guard
title Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds
title_full Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds
title_fullStr Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds
title_full_unstemmed Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds
title_short Predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds
title_sort predator guards on nest boxes improve nesting success of birds
topic cavity‐nesting birds
citizen science
nest box
nesting success
NestWatch
predator guard
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.801
work_keys_str_mv AT robynlbailey predatorguardsonnestboxesimprovenestingsuccessofbirds
AT davidnbonter predatorguardsonnestboxesimprovenestingsuccessofbirds