Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.

Information regarding vaccines from sources such as health services, media, and social networks can significantly shape vaccination decisions. In particular, the dissemination of negative information can contribute to vaccine hesitancy, thereby exacerbating infectious disease outbreaks. This study i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Alahmadi, Rebecca Hoyle, Michael Head, Markus Brede
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318544
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850129566839865344
author Sarah Alahmadi
Rebecca Hoyle
Michael Head
Markus Brede
author_facet Sarah Alahmadi
Rebecca Hoyle
Michael Head
Markus Brede
author_sort Sarah Alahmadi
collection DOAJ
description Information regarding vaccines from sources such as health services, media, and social networks can significantly shape vaccination decisions. In particular, the dissemination of negative information can contribute to vaccine hesitancy, thereby exacerbating infectious disease outbreaks. This study investigates strategies to mitigate anti-vaccine social contagion through effective counter-campaigns that disseminate positive vaccine information and encourage vaccine uptake, aiming to reduce the size of epidemics. In a coupled agent-based model that consists of opinion and disease diffusion processes, we explore and compare different heuristics to design positive campaigns based on the network structure and local presence of negative vaccine attitudes. We examine two campaigning regimes: a static regime with a fixed set of targets, and a dynamic regime in which targets can be updated over time. We demonstrate that strategic targeting and engagement with the dynamics of anti-vaccine influence diffusion in the network can effectively mitigate the spread of anti-vaccine sentiment, thereby reducing the epidemic size. However, the effectiveness of the campaigns differs across different targeting strategies and is impacted by a range of factors. We find that the primary advantage of static campaigns lies in their capacity to act as an obstacle, preventing the clustering of emerging anti-vaccine communities, thereby resulting in smaller and unconnected anti-vaccine groups. On the other hand, dynamic campaigns reach a broader segment of the population and adapt to the evolution of anti-vaccine diffusion, not only protecting susceptible agents from negative influence but also fostering positive propagation within negative regions.
format Article
id doaj-art-350abb4e18794e41aa36d2ac907ab0b1
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-350abb4e18794e41aa36d2ac907ab0b12025-08-20T02:32:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01203e031854410.1371/journal.pone.0318544Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.Sarah AlahmadiRebecca HoyleMichael HeadMarkus BredeInformation regarding vaccines from sources such as health services, media, and social networks can significantly shape vaccination decisions. In particular, the dissemination of negative information can contribute to vaccine hesitancy, thereby exacerbating infectious disease outbreaks. This study investigates strategies to mitigate anti-vaccine social contagion through effective counter-campaigns that disseminate positive vaccine information and encourage vaccine uptake, aiming to reduce the size of epidemics. In a coupled agent-based model that consists of opinion and disease diffusion processes, we explore and compare different heuristics to design positive campaigns based on the network structure and local presence of negative vaccine attitudes. We examine two campaigning regimes: a static regime with a fixed set of targets, and a dynamic regime in which targets can be updated over time. We demonstrate that strategic targeting and engagement with the dynamics of anti-vaccine influence diffusion in the network can effectively mitigate the spread of anti-vaccine sentiment, thereby reducing the epidemic size. However, the effectiveness of the campaigns differs across different targeting strategies and is impacted by a range of factors. We find that the primary advantage of static campaigns lies in their capacity to act as an obstacle, preventing the clustering of emerging anti-vaccine communities, thereby resulting in smaller and unconnected anti-vaccine groups. On the other hand, dynamic campaigns reach a broader segment of the population and adapt to the evolution of anti-vaccine diffusion, not only protecting susceptible agents from negative influence but also fostering positive propagation within negative regions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318544
spellingShingle Sarah Alahmadi
Rebecca Hoyle
Michael Head
Markus Brede
Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.
PLoS ONE
title Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.
title_full Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.
title_fullStr Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.
title_short Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: A computational approach.
title_sort modelling the mitigation of anti vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread a computational approach
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318544
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahalahmadi modellingthemitigationofantivaccineopinionpropagationtosuppressepidemicspreadacomputationalapproach
AT rebeccahoyle modellingthemitigationofantivaccineopinionpropagationtosuppressepidemicspreadacomputationalapproach
AT michaelhead modellingthemitigationofantivaccineopinionpropagationtosuppressepidemicspreadacomputationalapproach
AT markusbrede modellingthemitigationofantivaccineopinionpropagationtosuppressepidemicspreadacomputationalapproach