Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017
This article offers a critical analysis of the 2017 World Development Report on Governance and the Law. The Report marks a shift away from the single-minded worship of the market (World Development Reports [WDR] 2000/2001 and 2002) as well as the elevation of the state and the rule of law to the Wor...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institut de Hautes Études Internationales et du Développement
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/3227 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850172028717367296 |
|---|---|
| author | Shalini Randeria Lys Kulamadayil |
| author_facet | Shalini Randeria Lys Kulamadayil |
| author_sort | Shalini Randeria |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article offers a critical analysis of the 2017 World Development Report on Governance and the Law. The Report marks a shift away from the single-minded worship of the market (World Development Reports [WDR] 2000/2001 and 2002) as well as the elevation of the state and the rule of law to the World Bank’s pantheon (WDR, 2005). Its expansive polytheism now includes law and recognises its local plurality along with its imbrication in power asymmetries. This move to a capacious and diverse pantheon, which accommodates variety albeit at the expense of stringency, may possibly please those calling for a sensitivity to context instead of one-size-fits-all prescriptions. But it is unlikely to generate either a coherent theoretical perspective on law or a coherent set of policy recommendations. In terms of argument, language, and style, the Report is thus characterised by a curious disjunction between some important insights on the role of law in society on the one hand, and proposals on development governance on the other. The Report’s recognition of the double-edged nature of law and its acknowledgement of the vexed relationship between law, politics and power are weakened, for instance, by an exclusively positive appreciation of law’s functions in the policy arena. In view of its many unresolved tensions sustained in an attempt to cater to the tastes of a variety of different constituencies, the Report is likely to be less influential for development policy and practice than anticipated. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-34d701bc91d8411ea5f4873791859352 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1663-9375 1663-9391 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Institut de Hautes Études Internationales et du Développement |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement |
| spelling | doaj-art-34d701bc91d8411ea5f48737918593522025-08-20T02:20:10ZengInstitut de Hautes Études Internationales et du DéveloppementRevue Internationale de Politique de Développement1663-93751663-93912019-12-0112110.4000/poldev.3227Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017Shalini RanderiaLys KulamadayilThis article offers a critical analysis of the 2017 World Development Report on Governance and the Law. The Report marks a shift away from the single-minded worship of the market (World Development Reports [WDR] 2000/2001 and 2002) as well as the elevation of the state and the rule of law to the World Bank’s pantheon (WDR, 2005). Its expansive polytheism now includes law and recognises its local plurality along with its imbrication in power asymmetries. This move to a capacious and diverse pantheon, which accommodates variety albeit at the expense of stringency, may possibly please those calling for a sensitivity to context instead of one-size-fits-all prescriptions. But it is unlikely to generate either a coherent theoretical perspective on law or a coherent set of policy recommendations. In terms of argument, language, and style, the Report is thus characterised by a curious disjunction between some important insights on the role of law in society on the one hand, and proposals on development governance on the other. The Report’s recognition of the double-edged nature of law and its acknowledgement of the vexed relationship between law, politics and power are weakened, for instance, by an exclusively positive appreciation of law’s functions in the policy arena. In view of its many unresolved tensions sustained in an attempt to cater to the tastes of a variety of different constituencies, the Report is likely to be less influential for development policy and practice than anticipated.https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/3227political economyWorld Bankeconomic | development historydevelopment theories |
| spellingShingle | Shalini Randeria Lys Kulamadayil Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017 Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement political economy World Bank economic | development history development theories |
| title | Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017 |
| title_full | Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017 |
| title_fullStr | Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017 |
| title_short | Promise and Pitfalls of Polytheism: A critique of The World Development Report 2017 |
| title_sort | promise and pitfalls of polytheism a critique of the world development report 2017 |
| topic | political economy World Bank economic | development history development theories |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/3227 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shaliniranderia promiseandpitfallsofpolytheismacritiqueoftheworlddevelopmentreport2017 AT lyskulamadayil promiseandpitfallsofpolytheismacritiqueoftheworlddevelopmentreport2017 |