Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy Infrastructure
Energy conversion and infrastructure facilities consist of large amounts of metal and have lifetimes of several decades. When recycling metals, the methods of allocation play a decisive role in evaluating how primary and secondary materials, as well as the products that are produced with them, are t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3393 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849319680106299392 |
|---|---|
| author | Mario Schmidt Pia Heidak |
| author_facet | Mario Schmidt Pia Heidak |
| author_sort | Mario Schmidt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Energy conversion and infrastructure facilities consist of large amounts of metal and have lifetimes of several decades. When recycling metals, the methods of allocation play a decisive role in evaluating how primary and secondary materials, as well as the products that are produced with them, are to be evaluated ecologically. So-called credits for recycling are the subject of a particularly controversial discussion. This article shows that the current practice of giving credits for long-lasting products leads to a significant distortion of the actual emissions. Using the examples of steel, aluminum, and copper, prospective LCA data is used to show how the carbon footprint actually behaves. When credits are applied, the time dependency of emissions must be taken into account; otherwise, burden shifting into the future occurs, which can hardly be considered sustainable. The increase compared to the conventional time-independent practice lies, depending on the metal, at 70 to 300%. It is recommended that the cutoff approach be used conservatively when allocating recycling cascades in order to optimize environmental impact and avoid greenwashing. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-34d3ac95b8474c4a8a1613e4c2f2cae1 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj-art-34d3ac95b8474c4a8a1613e4c2f2cae12025-08-20T03:50:21ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732025-06-011813339310.3390/en18133393Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy InfrastructureMario Schmidt0Pia Heidak1Institute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University, 75175 Pforzheim, GermanyInstitute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University, 75175 Pforzheim, GermanyEnergy conversion and infrastructure facilities consist of large amounts of metal and have lifetimes of several decades. When recycling metals, the methods of allocation play a decisive role in evaluating how primary and secondary materials, as well as the products that are produced with them, are to be evaluated ecologically. So-called credits for recycling are the subject of a particularly controversial discussion. This article shows that the current practice of giving credits for long-lasting products leads to a significant distortion of the actual emissions. Using the examples of steel, aluminum, and copper, prospective LCA data is used to show how the carbon footprint actually behaves. When credits are applied, the time dependency of emissions must be taken into account; otherwise, burden shifting into the future occurs, which can hardly be considered sustainable. The increase compared to the conventional time-independent practice lies, depending on the metal, at 70 to 300%. It is recommended that the cutoff approach be used conservatively when allocating recycling cascades in order to optimize environmental impact and avoid greenwashing.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3393life cycle assessmentcarbon footprintallocationrecyclingsubstitutioncircular economy |
| spellingShingle | Mario Schmidt Pia Heidak Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy Infrastructure Energies life cycle assessment carbon footprint allocation recycling substitution circular economy |
| title | Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy Infrastructure |
| title_full | Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy Infrastructure |
| title_fullStr | Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy Infrastructure |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy Infrastructure |
| title_short | Intertemporal Allocation of Recycling for Long-Lived Materials from Energy Infrastructure |
| title_sort | intertemporal allocation of recycling for long lived materials from energy infrastructure |
| topic | life cycle assessment carbon footprint allocation recycling substitution circular economy |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3393 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marioschmidt intertemporalallocationofrecyclingforlonglivedmaterialsfromenergyinfrastructure AT piaheidak intertemporalallocationofrecyclingforlonglivedmaterialsfromenergyinfrastructure |