Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint

Introduction Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is a very common condition that leads to progressive loss of functionality of the first finger that can be surgically treated with arthrodesis of the saddle joint and suspension arthroplasty of the first metacarpal bone. There is a controversy over th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Artem O. Afanasyev, Alexander E. Chizhov, Nino V. Abdiba, Liubov A. Rodomanova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics 2025-04-01
Series:Гений oртопедии
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849715306719608832
author Artem O. Afanasyev
Alexander E. Chizhov
Nino V. Abdiba
Liubov A. Rodomanova
author_facet Artem O. Afanasyev
Alexander E. Chizhov
Nino V. Abdiba
Liubov A. Rodomanova
author_sort Artem O. Afanasyev
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is a very common condition that leads to progressive loss of functionality of the first finger that can be surgically treated with arthrodesis of the saddle joint and suspension arthroplasty of the first metacarpal bone. There is a controversy over the surgical technique to choose without consensus in the literature. The objective was to compare surgical outcomes of patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis treated with arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint. Material and methods The use of both surgical options resulted in significantly reduced pain measured with the VAS (p < 0.001) and improved upper limb function evaluated with the Quick DASH scale. The treatments differed in the median duration of plaster immobilization. The duration of postoperative immobilization in arthrodesis patients was statistically higher (p = 0.004) than that in suspension arthroplasty group. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups of heavy and light manual laborers (Pearson coefficient = 0.311). Discussion The findings of the series indicated parameters being different from those published in the literature. The dependence between functional results and the type of working activity of patients treated with both surgical methods was not confirmed. The choice between trapezio-metacarpal arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the first metacarpal bone based on the criterion of severity of work was not always correct. Increased periods of plaster immobilization in the saddle arthrodesis group are reported in the literature and associated with complications of the treatment option. Conclusion No significant differences were found between the outcomes of saddle arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the first metacarpal bone.
format Article
id doaj-art-34d0a9bf59924e4d859533413be71d2c
institution DOAJ
issn 1028-4427
2542-131X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics
record_format Article
series Гений oртопедии
spelling doaj-art-34d0a9bf59924e4d859533413be71d2c2025-08-20T03:13:26ZengRussian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and OrthopaedicsГений oртопедии1028-44272542-131X2025-04-0131217518210.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-2-175-182Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle jointArtem O. Afanasyev0https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6407-5888Alexander E. Chizhov1https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2019-6242Nino V. Abdiba2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-5299Liubov A. Rodomanova3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-7307Vreden National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg, Russian FederationVreden National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg, Russian FederationVreden National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation Vreden National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation Introduction Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is a very common condition that leads to progressive loss of functionality of the first finger that can be surgically treated with arthrodesis of the saddle joint and suspension arthroplasty of the first metacarpal bone. There is a controversy over the surgical technique to choose without consensus in the literature. The objective was to compare surgical outcomes of patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis treated with arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint. Material and methods The use of both surgical options resulted in significantly reduced pain measured with the VAS (p < 0.001) and improved upper limb function evaluated with the Quick DASH scale. The treatments differed in the median duration of plaster immobilization. The duration of postoperative immobilization in arthrodesis patients was statistically higher (p = 0.004) than that in suspension arthroplasty group. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups of heavy and light manual laborers (Pearson coefficient = 0.311). Discussion The findings of the series indicated parameters being different from those published in the literature. The dependence between functional results and the type of working activity of patients treated with both surgical methods was not confirmed. The choice between trapezio-metacarpal arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the first metacarpal bone based on the criterion of severity of work was not always correct. Increased periods of plaster immobilization in the saddle arthrodesis group are reported in the literature and associated with complications of the treatment option. Conclusion No significant differences were found between the outcomes of saddle arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the first metacarpal bone.osteoarthritistrapezio-metacarpal jointsuspension arthroplastyarthrodesis
spellingShingle Artem O. Afanasyev
Alexander E. Chizhov
Nino V. Abdiba
Liubov A. Rodomanova
Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint
Гений oртопедии
osteoarthritis
trapezio-metacarpal joint
suspension arthroplasty
arthrodesis
title Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint
title_full Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint
title_short Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint
title_sort comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of arthrodesis and suspension arthroplasty of the saddle joint
topic osteoarthritis
trapezio-metacarpal joint
suspension arthroplasty
arthrodesis
work_keys_str_mv AT artemoafanasyev comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesofarthrodesisandsuspensionarthroplastyofthesaddlejoint
AT alexanderechizhov comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesofarthrodesisandsuspensionarthroplastyofthesaddlejoint
AT ninovabdiba comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesofarthrodesisandsuspensionarthroplastyofthesaddlejoint
AT liubovarodomanova comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesofarthrodesisandsuspensionarthroplastyofthesaddlejoint