Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Although neuroendoscopy (NE) has been applied to many cerebral diseases, the effect of NE for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuping Li, Hengzhu Zhang, Xiaodong Wang, Lei She, Zhengcun Yan, Nan Zhang, Renfei Du, Kaixuan Yan, Enxi Xu, Lujun Pang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080599
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849701806659076096
author Yuping Li
Hengzhu Zhang
Xiaodong Wang
Lei She
Zhengcun Yan
Nan Zhang
Renfei Du
Kaixuan Yan
Enxi Xu
Lujun Pang
author_facet Yuping Li
Hengzhu Zhang
Xiaodong Wang
Lei She
Zhengcun Yan
Nan Zhang
Renfei Du
Kaixuan Yan
Enxi Xu
Lujun Pang
author_sort Yuping Li
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background and purpose</h4>Although neuroendoscopy (NE) has been applied to many cerebral diseases, the effect of NE for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of NE compared with external ventricular drainage (EVD) alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) on the management of IVH secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage.<h4>Methodology/ principal findings</h4>A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wan Fang database) was performed to identify related studies published from 1970 to 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies (OS) comparing NE with EVD alone or with IVF for the treatment of IVH were included. The quality of the included trials was assessed by Jaded scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RevMan 5.1 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Eleven trials (5 RCTs and 6 ORs) involving 680 patients were included. The odds ratio (OR) showed a statistically significant difference between the NE + EVD and EVD + IVF groups in terms of mortality (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.59; P=0.0004), effective hematoma evacuation rate (OR, 25.50, 95%CI; 14.30, 45.45; P<0.00001), good functional outcome (GFO) (OR, 4.51; (95%CI, 2.81-7.72; P<0.00001), and the ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt dependence rate (OR, 0.16; 95%CI; 0.06, 0.40; P<0.0001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Applying neuroendoscopic approach with EVD may be a better management for IVH secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage than NE + IVF. However, there is still no conclusive evidence regarding the preference of NE vs. EVD alone in the case of IVH, because insufficient data has been published thus far. This study suggests that the NE approach with EVD could become an alternative to EVD + IVF for IVH in the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-34cf5a141ecf41899b49b552acef5ae5
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-34cf5a141ecf41899b49b552acef5ae52025-08-20T03:17:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01811e8059910.1371/journal.pone.0080599Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Yuping LiHengzhu ZhangXiaodong WangLei SheZhengcun YanNan ZhangRenfei DuKaixuan YanEnxi XuLujun Pang<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Although neuroendoscopy (NE) has been applied to many cerebral diseases, the effect of NE for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of NE compared with external ventricular drainage (EVD) alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) on the management of IVH secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage.<h4>Methodology/ principal findings</h4>A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wan Fang database) was performed to identify related studies published from 1970 to 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies (OS) comparing NE with EVD alone or with IVF for the treatment of IVH were included. The quality of the included trials was assessed by Jaded scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RevMan 5.1 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Eleven trials (5 RCTs and 6 ORs) involving 680 patients were included. The odds ratio (OR) showed a statistically significant difference between the NE + EVD and EVD + IVF groups in terms of mortality (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.59; P=0.0004), effective hematoma evacuation rate (OR, 25.50, 95%CI; 14.30, 45.45; P<0.00001), good functional outcome (GFO) (OR, 4.51; (95%CI, 2.81-7.72; P<0.00001), and the ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt dependence rate (OR, 0.16; 95%CI; 0.06, 0.40; P<0.0001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Applying neuroendoscopic approach with EVD may be a better management for IVH secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage than NE + IVF. However, there is still no conclusive evidence regarding the preference of NE vs. EVD alone in the case of IVH, because insufficient data has been published thus far. This study suggests that the NE approach with EVD could become an alternative to EVD + IVF for IVH in the future.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080599
spellingShingle Yuping Li
Hengzhu Zhang
Xiaodong Wang
Lei She
Zhengcun Yan
Nan Zhang
Renfei Du
Kaixuan Yan
Enxi Xu
Lujun Pang
Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080599
work_keys_str_mv AT yupingli neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hengzhuzhang neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaodongwang neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leishe neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengcunyan neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nanzhang neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renfeidu neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaixuanyan neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT enxixu neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lujunpang neuroendoscopicsurgeryversusexternalventriculardrainagealoneorwithintraventricularfibrinolysisforintraventricularhemorrhagesecondarytospontaneoussupratentorialhemorrhageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis