On third space and critical paralysis

The concept of ‘third space’ in HE identifies an emerging area of work and consequent development of roles and practices which exist ‘in-between' academic and professional departments of universities (Whitchurch, 2013). Third space roles and practices can shape, challenge and extend what were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/1260
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576270316077056
author Steven White
author_facet Steven White
author_sort Steven White
collection DOAJ
description The concept of ‘third space’ in HE identifies an emerging area of work and consequent development of roles and practices which exist ‘in-between' academic and professional departments of universities (Whitchurch, 2013). Third space roles and practices can shape, challenge and extend what were previously considered well-defined boundaries in and around HE. As evidenced by the 21 distinct mentions of third space in How to be a Learning Developer (Syska and Buckley, 2024) and its place in the ALDinHE Manifesto (2023), awareness of third space is widespread in our field. In this theoretical analysis, I briefly sketch the origins of Whitchurch’s concept of third space in higher education in broader critical theory perspectives on the social world. This intellectual heritage, often articulated through social justice approaches to learning development (LD), has informed nuanced analyses of problems and tensions in HE institutions. However, inspired (in a bad way) by ‘mystical Marxist’ Soja’s ‘startlingly arcane’ definition of Thirdspace, I argue that aspects of critical theory or critical social justice orientations to LD can lead to contradictions or even paralysis in attempts to actually use the considerable empirical insights provided by Whitchurch, and the metaphor of third space more broadly, to inform practice. I highlight a more pragmatic approach to using the third space concept. This approach involves applying Whitchurch’s practically applicable ideas of ‘four dimensions of blended professional activity’, and three ‘phases of third space processes’. These ideas are exemplified in some aspects of LD research but are rarely elaborated on for use.
format Article
id doaj-art-3463db43fccd4537a7bc8e8b7e2509ba
institution Kabale University
issn 1759-667X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
record_format Article
series Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
spelling doaj-art-3463db43fccd4537a7bc8e8b7e2509ba2025-01-31T07:56:36ZengAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education1759-667X2025-01-013310.47408/jldhe.vi33.1260On third space and critical paralysisSteven White0University of Southampton The concept of ‘third space’ in HE identifies an emerging area of work and consequent development of roles and practices which exist ‘in-between' academic and professional departments of universities (Whitchurch, 2013). Third space roles and practices can shape, challenge and extend what were previously considered well-defined boundaries in and around HE. As evidenced by the 21 distinct mentions of third space in How to be a Learning Developer (Syska and Buckley, 2024) and its place in the ALDinHE Manifesto (2023), awareness of third space is widespread in our field. In this theoretical analysis, I briefly sketch the origins of Whitchurch’s concept of third space in higher education in broader critical theory perspectives on the social world. This intellectual heritage, often articulated through social justice approaches to learning development (LD), has informed nuanced analyses of problems and tensions in HE institutions. However, inspired (in a bad way) by ‘mystical Marxist’ Soja’s ‘startlingly arcane’ definition of Thirdspace, I argue that aspects of critical theory or critical social justice orientations to LD can lead to contradictions or even paralysis in attempts to actually use the considerable empirical insights provided by Whitchurch, and the metaphor of third space more broadly, to inform practice. I highlight a more pragmatic approach to using the third space concept. This approach involves applying Whitchurch’s practically applicable ideas of ‘four dimensions of blended professional activity’, and three ‘phases of third space processes’. These ideas are exemplified in some aspects of LD research but are rarely elaborated on for use. https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/1260third spacecritical theorysocial justicelearning development
spellingShingle Steven White
On third space and critical paralysis
Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
third space
critical theory
social justice
learning development
title On third space and critical paralysis
title_full On third space and critical paralysis
title_fullStr On third space and critical paralysis
title_full_unstemmed On third space and critical paralysis
title_short On third space and critical paralysis
title_sort on third space and critical paralysis
topic third space
critical theory
social justice
learning development
url https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/1260
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenwhite onthirdspaceandcriticalparalysis